Audit of the clinical use of fresh-frozen plasma in Umbria: study design and results of the pilot phase.

BACKGROUND: Fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) is unanimously recognised by international guidelines as the blood component of choice for the management of acute haemorrhage when accompanied by disorders of haemostasis, for disseminated intravascular coagulation in the presence of haemorrhage, for rare bleeding disorders when specific clotting factor concentrates are not available and for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The literature, however, reports a high percentage of inappropriate requests for FFP. This article presents the results of a pilot study of clinical auditing of the use of FFP in the Region of Umbria (Italy). METHODS: This study was based on the examination of the requests for FFP made in April 2006 to four Immunotransfusion Services (ITS) in Umbria and of the clinical records of the patients receiving transfusions. The following indicators were identified and evaluated: completeness of the request, appropriateness of the indication and the dose, completeness of the records in the clinical charts, adverse events, in-hospital morbidity and mortality, efficacy of the treatment (evaluated by analysing the changes between pre- and post-transfusion coagulation test results) and, as an indicator of the process, the correspondence between data in the paper request form and in the computerised database. The data were extracted from the ITS databases, from the paper request forms and from the patients' clinical records. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-one requests (615 units of FFP) for 109 patients and 92.8% of the related clinical records were examined. The patients were admitted in medical (22.9%), surgical (51.4%) and critical care units (25.7%). In 50.7% of the cases, the completeness of the data in the individual requests was good (65-80% of the fields filled in). The indication was appropriate in 31.5% of the requests evaluated (56.1% of the total), with no difference related to different requesters. The dosage was appropriate in 62.7% of the requests evaluated (62% of the total). A comparison of pre- and posttransfusion laboratory data showed a significant correction of pathological values (p=0.02) only for the International Normalised Ratio (INR). CONCLUSIONS: Critical areas that should be targeted by interventions to improve plasma usage are those related to the appropriateness of the indication, the completeness of the data entered in the request forms and the data recorded in the clinical charts.

The good use of plasma. A critical analysis of five international guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The clinical use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) is progressively increasing both nationally and internationally, despite the fact that many studies have shown the weaknesses of the indications for its use. Guidelines on the good use of plasma have, therefore, been adopted in various countries. The aim of the present study was to analyse some of the existing guidelines on the good use of plasma, applying a scientifically validated method, as a preliminary step in the implementation of Regional guidelines. METHODS: Abibliographic search (1990-2006) was conducted in databases, websites, and the archives of scientific societies. Relevant articles were recovered in full. The selected guidelines were evaluated using theAGREE instrument, which assesses the completeness and structural quality of the guidelines and, in some aspects, the contents of the recommendations. The project, co-ordinated by the Regional Centre for Co-ordination and Compensation (CRCC) and carried out by four Services of Immunohaematology and Transfusion (SIT) in Umbria, was funded by the Region of Umbria and approved by the four health care institutions involved. RESULTS: The bibliographic search yielded 3067 abstracts of which 239 were considered relevant. The analysis of these led to the recovery of 11 guidelines, among which five were selected: those from the British Committee for Standards in Haematology, theAgence Française de Securité Sanitaire de Produits de Sante, the Canadian Members of the Expert Working Group, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Blood Component Therapy and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)/Australasian Society of Blood Transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: None of the guidelines analysed obtained a score higher than 50% in all the domains of the AGREE score. There was no evidence of a tendency to improvement over time in the guidelines analysed. Objective evaluation of the guidelines analysed could provide the starting point for the subsequent production of similar documents.

Usefulness of lyophilized calibration plasmas for International Normalized Ratio determination with the bovine combined thromboplastin (Thrombotest): results of a collaborative study.

The logical solution to account for the influence of coagulometers on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) is local calibration with freeze-dried plasmas. However, because of their unpredictable behavior these plasmas must be validated before large-scale implementation. We report on a collaborative exercise designed to evaluate the suitability of a set of such plasmas used with Thrombotest in combination with a coagulometer provided by the manufacturer to be used with that reagent. This was a two-step study. First, one lot of reagent was calibrated against the international standard OBT/79 in two expert laboratories. The calibrated lot was then used as an intermediate standard to calibrate two additional lots of the same reagent in four field laboratories where the ISI was determined for both plasma and native blood. The International Normalized Ratio (INR) for the patient plasmas tested in each laboratory were calculated using two algorithms: the World Health Organization-recommended ISI mode (gold standard), and the simplified calibration plasma mode. In the latter, the INR was derived from the local calibration curve constructed by plotting the certified INR versus local coagulation times obtained with calibration plasmas. The between-algorithm INR differences indicate that this set of calibration plasmas may be employed for local INR calibration of the investigated reagent/instrument combination, especially when plasma is used for INR determination where the average INR (range) difference is 5% (3-13%) or 2% (3-8%) according to whether the INRs to calibration plasmas were assigned by the manufacturer or by the two expert laboratories. A slight but measurable difference of the INR may be predicted [9% (6-20%) or 6% (8-15%)] if this set of calibration plasmas is used for local calibration when native blood is employed for INR determination. Whether this bias is of practical significance is to be determined.