[Rheumatoid factor positivity rather than anti-CCP positivity, a lower disability and a lower number of anti-TNFalpha agents failed are associated with response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis]. / La presenza del fattore reumatoide, la disabilità ed il numero di precedenti anti-TNFalpha falliti predicono la risposta clinica a rituximab nell'artrite reumatoide.

OBJECTIVE: Predictors of response to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an important issue in the current era. Rituximab (RTX) has been demonstrated effective and safe in active RA, resistant to traditional or biologic DMARDs. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with active longstanding RA were treated with RTX after traditional DMARD or anti-TNF alpha therapy failure. RESULTS: Number of anti-TNF treatment previously failed (p=0.005), HAQ (p=0.013), rheumatoid factor (RF) (p=0.0002) and anti-CCP (p=0.006) were associated with an ACR response > or =50 at the end of 6th month by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the number of anti-TNF previously failed, baseline HAQ and RF, but not anti-CCP were associated with an ACR response > or =50. EULAR moderate/good response was associated with ESR value (p=0.036), HAQ (p=0.032), and RF (p=0.01) by univariate analysis, while only RF positivity was associated with EULAR moderate/good response by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: RF positivity rather than anti-CCP positivity is a predictor of response to RTX, suggesting that RF-positive patients with low disability may obtain a clinical response when treated to RTX after the first anti-TNF agent failure or after traditional DMARD therapies. Larger studies are required to confirm these results.

Analysis of protease-activated receptor-1 and -2 in human scar formation.

Protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and PAR-2 are reported to contribute to the fibrotic process in a number of organs, including lung, liver, pancreas, and kidney. The aim of this study was to localize expression and biological activity of PAR-1 and PAR-2 in normal and pathological cutaneous scars. First, we investigated the immunohistochemical expression of PAR-1 and PAR-2 proteins in a series of human normal scars (NS, n = 10), hypertrophic scars (HS, n = 10), and keloids (K, n = 10). Expression of PAR-1 and PAR-2 was observed in all types of scar. Specifically, in HS and K, diffuse PAR-1 and PAR-2 positivity was found in dermal cellular areas composed of myofibroblasts, while no or minor staining was observed in the scattered fibroblasts embedded in abundant extracellular matrix in the context of the more collagenous nodules, irrespective of the type of scar. The hyperplastic epidermis overlying K was also found to be strongly PAR-1 and PAR-2 positive, whilst in most NS and HS the epidermis was faintly to moderately stained. Second, ribonuclease protection assay on paraffin-embedded specimens showed overexpression of PAR-1 and PAR-2 mRNA in K compared to NS and HS. Third, cultured human fibroblasts exposed to TGF-beta1 expressed a myofibroblast phenotype associated with overexpression of PAR-2, while PAR-1 expression was unaffected. Intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization by PAR-2 agonists in myofibroblasts was increased as compared to fibroblasts, whereas the effect of PAR-1 agonists was unchanged. Our in vivo study indicates that PAR-1 and PAR-2 are expressed in cells involved in physiological and pathological scar formation and suggests that in vitro overexpression and exaggerated functional response of PAR-2 may play a role in the function of myofibroblasts in scar evolution from a physiological repair process to a pathological tissue response.