In-line radiolabeling: a novel continuous-flow system for commercial-scale protein labeling.

UNLABELLED: A key limitation in developing radiotherapeutic proteins is the expense of manufacturing the drug in small batches using traditional reaction vessels. Removing limitations on the quantity of protein labeled at any one time significantly decreases the cost of production, and nowhere is the need for cost-effective radiotherapeutics more acute than in the treatment of cancer. METHODS: We describe a novel method that can rapidly radiolabel, theoretically, unlimited amounts of protein, without causing significant damage to binding potency or structural integrity. Our process controls the reaction rate for the isotope and reactants as they simultaneously flow through a reaction tube. RESULTS: We have demonstrated proof of principle by labeling nearly a gram of antibody with 481 GBq (13 Ci) of (131)I during a single 30-min reaction run. CONCLUSION: Simple to construct, our system is already used to manufacture a radiolabeled antibody, both in the United States and in India, as part of clinical trials to treat glioblastoma multiforme. Modified, this system may be also applicable for nonradioactive labeling.

131I-rituximab: relationship between immunoreactivity and specific activity.

UNLABELLED: As part of a search for optimal conditions for radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma, rituximab was labeled with 2 different specific activities of 131I and immunoreactivity was comparatively measured. METHODS: Labeling was performed with chloramine T using as starting conditions 185 MBq of 131I per 1 mg and per 5 mg of antibody for labelings A and B, respectively. Six comparative labelings were performed over a period of 10 mo with similar efficacy and purified by anion-exchange chromatography. Immunoreactivity was determined immediately after labeling in parallel assays using different concentrations of fresh Raji and Daudi cells. Results were compared at maximal observed specific binding on 10(7) cells and after extrapolation to infinite antigen excess. A statistical analysis was performed to predict the frequency of radiolabeled mono- and polyiodinated antibodies: First, a gaussian distribution predicted the number of iodine atoms per antibody in labelings A and B, respectively; then, the radiolabeling probability was developed according to the Newton binome. RESULTS: Final radiochemical purity was >98.4% for all labelings. The final mean specific activities were 169.7 MBq/mg and 32.8 MBq/mg, corresponding to 0.87 and 0.17 iodine atoms per antibody in labelings A and B, respectively. Labeling B showed a significantly higher immunoreactivity than did labeling A, the mean relative increase in binding being > or =28% for both Raji cells and Daudi cells. The predictive statistical analysis indicated that 57.3% and 15.4% of radiolabeled antibodies in labelings A and B, respectively, were polyiodinated. CONCLUSION: The low specific activity of 131I-rituximab allowed preservation of a high immunoreactivity and correlated with the prediction of a low percentage of polyiodinated radiolabeled antibodies.

Measurement of the extracellular space in brain tumors using 76Br-bromide and PET.

UNLABELLED: Brain edema significantly contributes to the clinical course of human brain tumor patients. There is evidence that an enlargement of the extracellular space (ECS) is involved in the development of brain edema. Although T2-weighted magnetic resonance (T2-MR) images represent brain edema by its increased water content, they do not differentiate ECS enlargement from increased intracellular water content. METHODS: On the basis of the known distribution of bromide in the ECS, we used (76)Br-bromide and PET to measure the regional ECS in 9 brain tumor patients. Transport rate constants and the distribution volume (DV) of (76)Br-bromide in normal brain and tumor were derived from dynamic PET scans and the measured (76)Br-bromide concentration in arterial plasma. We evaluated different models regarding their reliability in estimating the ECS. RESULTS: Assuming that the DV of (76)Br-bromide represents the ECS, robust estimates were possible for all investigated regions. In normal brain, ECS was within a narrow range-for example, occipital lobe, 19.9% +/- 3.1%-and was lower in 2 dexamethasone-treated patients compared with untreated patients. In 7 of 9 tumors, increased ECS ranged between 43.8% and 61.1%. ECS increases were confined to the tumor mass and did not extend into peritumoral edematous brain. Two patients with large hyperintense lesions according to T2-MR images showed normal ECS values within the lesion. CONCLUSION: (76)Br-Bromide PET allows a quantitative measurement of the ECS in brain edema and in normal brain. The discrepancies between lesions shown by T2-MRI and regional ECS enlargement as measured with PET challenge the concept of tumor-induced brain edema.