ABSTRACT
n familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), 20% of classical and 70% of attenuated/atypical (AFAP) cases remain mutation-negative after routine testing; yet, allelic expression imbalance may suggest an APC alteration. Our aim was to determine the proportion of families attributable to genetic or epigenetic changes in the APC promoter region. We studied 51 unrelated families/cases (26 with classical FAP and 25 with AFAP) with no point mutations in the exons and exon/intron borders and no rearrangements by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA, P043-B1). Promoter-specific events of APC were addressed by targeted resequencing, MLPA (P043-C1), methylation-specific MLPA, and Sanger sequencing of promoter regions. A novel 132-kb deletion encompassing the APC promoter 1B and upstream sequence occurred in a classical FAP family with allele-specific APC expression. No promoter-specific point mutations or hypermethylation were present in any family. In conclusion, promoter-specific alterations are a rare cause for mutation-negative FAP (1/51, 2%). The frequency and clinical correlations of promoter 1B deletions are poorly defined. This investigation provides frequencies of 1/26 (4%) for classical FAP, 0/25 (0%) for AFAP, and 1/7 (14%) for families with allele-specific expression of APC. Clinically, promoter 1B deletions may associate with classical FAP without extracolonic manifestations.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein/genetics , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/genetics , Point Mutation , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alleles , Base Sequence , Cohort Studies , DNA Methylation , Epigenesis, Genetic , Humans , Loss of Heterozygosity , Middle Aged , Pedigree , Sequence Deletion , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The first Argentine experience with epidemiologic, molecular, and genetic counseling data is reported. METHODS: We analyzed 43 families fulfilling Amsterdam criteria identified from a prospective database with data from 779 relatives. RESULTS: Eleven families (25.6 percent) presented as Lynch I, 29 (67.4 percent) as Lynch II, and 3 (7 percent) as Muir-Torre syndrome. Among the 306 affected members, 197 cases of colorectal cancer were identified (mean age at diagnosis, 52.1 (range, 21-90) years). The most frequent extracolonic tumors were gastric adenocarcinoma in males and endometrium adenocarcinoma in females. A high incidence of breast cancer was observed (16 cases among 155 females, crude rate: 11,594.20/100,000). Twenty-seven patients (8.8 percent) developed more than one tumor. These patients were younger than those with only one tumor (45 vs. 51 years; P = 0.001). In 5 of 11 patients who underwent molecular sequencing, a pathologic mutation was found. A novel C deletion at 1910 nucleotide, codon 637, exon 12 of MSH2 gene was identified in a family with a strong aggregation of breast cancer with lack of MSH2 immunohistochemical staining. For 78.2 percent of counseled individuals, this session represented the first time they received information, and 73.9 percent stated that their physicians were unaware of their family background. CONCLUSIONS: Argentine families presented a high incidence of stomach cancer. The elevated incidence of breast cancer and its association with a novel hMSH2 mutation bring to consideration the inclusion of this malignancy as part of the syndrome. A lack of awareness by both physicians and persons at risk was observed.
Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/pathology , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Argentina/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/epidemiology , Female , Genetic Counseling , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , MutL Protein Homolog 1 , Pedigree , Referral and Consultation , RegistriesABSTRACT
We constructed a simple, flexible procedure that facilitates the pre-assessment of feasibility of workplace health promotion (WHP) programmes. It evaluates cancer hazards, workers' need for hazard reduction, acceptability of WHP, and social context. It was tested and applied in 16 workplace communities and among 1085 employees in industry, construction, transport, services, teaching and municipal works in Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Spain and Sweden. Social context is inseparable from WHP. It covers workers' organizations and representatives, management, safety committees, occupational health services, health and safety enforcement agencies, general health services, non-government organizations, insurance systems, academic and other institutions, regulatory stipulations pertaining WHP, and material resources. Priorities, risk definitions, attitudes, hazard profiles, motivations and assessment methods were highly contextual. Management preferred passive interventions, helping cover expert costs, participating in planning and granting time. Trade unions, workers' representatives, safety committees and occupational health services appeared to be important operational partners. Occupational health services may however be loaded with curative and screening functions or be non-existent. We advocate participatory, multifaceted WHP based on the needs and empowerment of the workers themselves, integrating occupational and lifestyle hazards. Workforce in irregular and shift work, in agriculture, in small enterprises, in the informal sector, and immigrant, seasonal and temporary workers represent groups in need of particular strategies such as community health promotion. In a more general framework, social context itself may become a target for intervention.
Subject(s)
Health Promotion/organization & administration , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health Services/organization & administration , Attitude to Health , Costa Rica , Feasibility Studies , Finland , Germany , Health Behavior , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Needs Assessment , Primary Prevention/methods , Social Environment , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , SwedenSubject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics , Lymphoma/genetics , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/genetics , Seminal Plasma Proteins/genetics , DNA Repair , Gene Rearrangement, beta-Chain T-Cell Antigen Receptor , Genes, T-Cell Receptor beta/genetics , Genetic Loci , Humans , Infertility, Male/genetics , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/physiology , Male , Sequence DeletionABSTRACT
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most common hereditary form of colorectal cancer (CRC). Our purpose is to describe three extended HNPCC families, each of which manifests novel germline mutations in Uruguay, a small country that is a study model for cancer investigation given its high cancer incidence and mortality rate. This is a study of three extended HNPCC families in which extensive genealogic information, medical history, and pathology findings are critically reviewed. DNA testing was performed for evidence of HNPCC mutations. The findings reveal three novel germline mutations, namely MLH1, with a deletion resulting in a frameshift and a premature stop codon (codon 228) in one of the families; in the second family, MSH2 exon 1, codon 61 at nucleotide 181, which results in immediate stop of translation; and in the third family, a mutation in MSH2 at exon 3: the amino acid at nucleotide 530, codon 117, causing a frameshift and a premature stop codon eight base pairs later. We conclude that it is important to study HNPCC mismatch repair genes because of emerging evidence for genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity, which will harbor the potential to eventually translate this knowledge into specific screening and management protocols. Future projections for such mutations could even contribute to the emergence of molecular-based designer drugs developed through advances in genomics, proteomics, high-throughput screening, and bioinformatics, which would be effective therapeutically for these high-cancer risk patients.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins , Germ-Line Mutation , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Adult , Base Sequence , Carrier Proteins , Codon, Nonsense , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Frameshift Mutation , Genetic Counseling , Humans , Male , Molecular Sequence Data , MutL Protein Homolog 1 , MutS Homolog 2 Protein , Nuclear Proteins , Pedigree , UruguayABSTRACT
We tested for azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions 17 loci corresponding to AZF subintervals a-d in 17 cases of testicular tumors occurring in Finns. While DNA samples from 48 CEPH and 32 Finnish males showed no deletions, patients with testicular cancer displayed AZF deletion mosaicisms in various non-tumor tissues (13 cases) and specific deletion haplotypes in tumor tissues (10 cases). Two of the cases with AZF deletions were testicular non-Hodgkin lymphomas indicating that Y-microdeletions appear also in malignancies other than seminoma and non-seminoma tumors. In good agreement with this assumption, we detected one AZF deletion in normal cells from 1 of 5 HNPCC cases, heterozygous for an MLH1 mutation. We propose that AZF deletions occur in early embryogenesis due to mutations of TSPY, mismatch repair (MMR), or X-specific genes. Since fathers of testicular, tumor cases did not exhibit AZF deletions, we assumed they were not carriers of the mutation inducing AZF deletion-mosaicisms. Therefore, tumor cases should have received the MMR gene or X mutations via the maternal lineage, or for the case of TSPY and MMR genes via a sperm carrying a mutation occurred in the paternal germ-cell line. We consider AZF microdeletions in non-tumor cells to be part of a broader pattern of chromosome instability producing susceptibility to testicular tumors. Clonal transformation and expansion of one of these tumor-susceptible cell lineages give rise to testicular tumors showing genome anomalies characteristic of testicular cancers (i12p, LOH and genetic imbalance for various autosomal regions, Y- and autosomal MSI, specific AZF deletion haplotypes).