Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) ; 87(3): 378-385, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38449316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) has been used as an effective agent since 1949 for managing complicated pleural effusion and empyema. Several agents, such as streptokinase, urokinase (UK), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), have been found to be effective with variable effectiveness. However, a head-tohead controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the most frequently used agents, i.e., UK and rt-PA (alteplase) for managing complicated pleural effusion has rarely been reported. METHODS: A total of 50 patients were randomized in two intervention groups, i.e., UK and rt-PA. The dose of rt-PA was 10 mg, and that of UK was 1.0 lac units. UK was given thrice daily for 2 days, followed by clamping to allow the retainment of drugs in the pleural space for 2 hours. rt-PA was instilled into the pleural space twice daily for 2 days, and intercostal drainage was clamped for 1 hour. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled into the study, of which 84% (n=42) were males and 16% (n=8) were females. Among them, 30 (60%) patients received UK, and 20 (40%) patients received alteplase as IPFT agents. The percentage of mean± standard deviation changes in pleural opacity was -33.0%±9.9% in the UK group and -41.0%±14.9% in the alteplase group, respectively (p=0.014). Pain was the most common adverse side effect, occurring in 60% (n=18) of the patients in the UK group and in 40% (n=8) of the patients in the alteplase group (p=0.24), while fever was the second most common side effect. Patients who reported early (within 6 weeks of onset of symptoms) showed a greater response than those who reported late for the intervention. CONCLUSION: IPFT is a safe and effective option for managing complicated pleural effusion or empyema, and newer agents, such as alteplase, have greater efficacy and a similar adverse effect profile when compared with conventional agents, such as UK.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37360888

ABSTRACT

Background: Neutralizing antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab) has received emergency use authorization recommendation by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and WHO for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection in specific high-risk groups. Antibodies cocktail has shown promising results in preventing progression to severe disease, but the real-world experience is still evolving. Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of 22 patients who were administered the antibodies cocktail between August 2021 and March 2022 at our tertiary care center. Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective analysis of clinicoradiological, inflammatory parameters, progression of the disease, and outcome among 22 mild and moderate COVID-19 patients treated with antibodies cocktail. Results: The mean age was 67.7 years (SD ± 18.3) and comprised of 13 males (59%), while 9 were females (40.9%). Nine (40.9%) patients were fully vaccinated with two doses, nine (40.9%) were partially vaccinated with one dose while four patients (18.2%) were unvaccinated, and the rest were unvaccinated. Diabetes and hypertension were the commonest comorbidities; hematological and solid organ malignancies were other comorbidities. Eight patients had radiological opacities consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia and had shown significant regression in four patients after the therapy. None of our patients required supplemental oxygen or progressed to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. All patients were discharged in a stable condition within 6 days of the therapy. Conclusions: The neutralizing antibodies cocktail has shown encouraging results in our analysis in preventing progression to severe disease in patients with high-risk conditions.

3.
Adv Respir Med ; 89(6): 589-596, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34966994

ABSTRACT

The current COVID-19 pandemic has spread like wildfire worldwide and has affected millions of people. The novel corona virus mainly affects the lungs leading to life threatening disease like acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aftermath of the disease in form of pulmonary fibrosis is upcoming cause of further increase in morbidity and mortality. Nintedanib is an oral antifibrotics with proven role in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, however its use in COVID-19 related pulmonary fibrosis has not been studied. We report our early experience of use of nintedanib in COVID-19 related pulmonary fibrosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/drug therapy , Indoles/therapeutic use , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , Respiratory System Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diet therapy , Humans , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...