Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hosp Pediatr ; 13(11): e325-e328, 2023 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37860836

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes seasonal outbreaks of respiratory tract infections in children, leading to increased emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Although the risk of severe illnesses difficult to predict, the sudden surge in RSV may strain the health care system. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the utility of Google Trends search activity on RSV to predict changes in RSV-related hospitalizations in children in the United States in 2019. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pediatric hospitalization was conducted using the 2019 HCUP-Kids Inpatient Database. Google Trends search activity for "RSV" was abstracted as a monthly relative interest score for 2019. RSV-related hospitalizations were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9/10 codes. We applied finite distributed lag models to estimate the causal effect over time of historical relative search activity and long-run propensity to calculate the cumulative effect of changes in relative search activity on admission rate. RESULTS: Of the total 102 127 RSV-related pediatric hospitalizations, 90% were in those aged ≤2 years. Admissions were common in males (55%), non-Hispanic Whites (50%), and South region (39%). Across 2o successive months, the cumulative effect of a 1-unit score increase in relative interest was associated with an increase of 140.7 (95% confidence interval, 96.2-185.2; P < .05) RSV-related admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Historic Google Trends search activity for RSV predicts lead-time RSV-related pediatric hospitalization. Further studies are needed to validate these findings using regional health systems.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses , Male , Child , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Search Engine , Hospitalization
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 2022 Dec 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36572036

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Studies exploring the relationship between neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and congenital anomalies (CA) in the United States are limited given the small sample size or data prior to the opioid epidemic. We aimed to determine if there is an association between NAS and CA in a nationally representative cohort of newborn hospitalization in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional analysis of NAS-related hospitalizations within the 2016 Kids Inpatient Database. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes were used to identify NAS hospitalizations and those with and without CA. The primary outcome was the odds of CAs in NAS hospitalizations. Multivariate survey logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between NAS and CA. RESULTS: Among 3.7 million newborn hospitalizations, 25,394 had NAS (6.7 per 1,000). The prevalence of any CA was higher in those with NAS when compared with non-NAS hospitalizations (10.3 vs. 4.9%; odds ratio = 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.13-2.43). Adjusted analysis showed similar results (adjusted odds ratio: = 1.83, CI: 1.71-1.95). NAS hospitalizations with CA had a higher mortality rate (0.6 vs 0.04%, p < 0.0001) and higher resource use. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study shows that NAS may be associated with increased odds of CAs, suggesting that NAS may be a risk factor for increased morbidity in the newborn period. KEY POINTS: · 1 in 10 newborns with NAS had at least one congenital anomaly.. · NAS hospitalization with congenital anomalies had higher resource use and mortality.. · Pediatricians caring for newborns with NAS should have a high index of suspicion for birth defects..

3.
BMJ Open ; 11(11): e053158, 2021 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34732494

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among New York City Health and Hospitals (NYC H+H) healthcare workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and describe demographic and occupational factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers. DESIGN: Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of data from SARS-CoV-2 serological tests accompanied by a demographic and occupational survey administered to healthcare workers. SETTING: A large, urban public healthcare system in NYC. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were employed by NYC H+H and either completed serological testing at NYC H+H between 30 April 2020 and 30 June 2020, or completed SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing outside of NYC H+H and were able to self-report results from the same time period. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: SARS-CoV-2 serostatus, stratified by key demographic and occupational characteristics reported through the demographic and occupational survey. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-seven survey respondents were included in analysis. Participants had a mean age of 46 years (SD=12.19) and 543 (75%) were women. Two hundred and fourteen (29%) participants tested positive or reported testing positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG+). Characteristics associated with positive SARS-CoV-2 serostatus were Black race (25% IgG +vs 15% IgG-, p=0.001), having someone in the household with COVID-19 symptoms (49% IgG +vs 21% IgG-, p<0.001), or having a confirmed COVID-19 case in the household (25% IgG +vs 5% IgG-, p<0.001). Characteristics associated with negative SARS-CoV-2 serostatus included working on a COVID-19 patient floor (27% IgG +vs 36% IgG-, p=0.02), working in the intensive care unit (20% IgG +vs 28% IgG-, p=0.03), being employed in a clinical occupation (64% IgG +vs 78% IgG-, p<0.001) or having close contact with a patient with COVID-19 (51% IgG +vs 62% IgG-, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results underscore the significance that community factors and inequities might have on SARS-CoV-2 exposure for healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , Seroepidemiologic Studies
4.
Am J Prev Med ; 58(3): 446-452, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31924460

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Rising trends in stroke incidence and hospitalizations because of combustible cigarette smoking have been noted among younger adults. However, the association between e-cigarette use and stroke in this population remains largely unknown. This study examines the association between e-cigarette use with or without a history of previous or concurrent combustible cigarette use and stroke among young adults. METHODS: Pooled data (2016-2017) were analyzed from the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System, a nationally representative, cross-sectional telephone survey, in 2019. The sample size was 161,529 participants aged 18-44 years. The association between e-cigarette use and stroke was examined using logistic regression adjusting for patient demographics, relevant comorbidities without or with history, and concurrent use of combustible cigarette use. RESULTS: Current dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes was associated with 2.91 times higher odds of stroke versus nonsmokers (AOR=2.91, 95% CI=1.62, 5.25) and 1.83 times higher odds versus current sole combustible cigarette users (AOR=1.83, 95% CI=1.06, 3.17). Compared with nonsmokers, current sole e-cigarette users did not show significantly different odds of stroke (AOR=0.69, 95% CI=0.34, 1.42). However, odds of stroke were lower for sole e-cigarette users versus current sole combustible cigarette users (AOR=0.43, 95% CI=0.20, 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Sole e-cigarette use is not associated with greater odds of stroke in young adults. However, if young adults have former or current combustible cigarette use, odds of stroke are significantly increased even compared with current sole combustible cigarette use. Switching from combustible cigarettes to e-cigarettes does not confer stroke benefits.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/epidemiology , Vaping/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Stroke/etiology , United States/epidemiology , Vaping/physiopathology , Young Adult
5.
Stroke ; 51(1): 308-310, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31707926

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose- Amidst legalization of therapeutic and recreational use of marijuana/cannabis in the United States, cerebrovascular effects of marijuana use remain largely unknown, especially among young adults. We aimed to examine the association between marijuana use (18-44 years) among young adults and stroke events. Methods- The study analyzed pooled data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2016-2017)-a nationally representative cross-sectional survey collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Weighted logistic regression models were used to examine an association of recent marijuana use (within the last 30 days) and stroke in young adults (18-44 years) adjusting for patient demographics, risk behavior, and relevant comorbidities. Results- Overall, 13.6% of participants (n=43 860; weighted 35.5 million; 49.9% men) reported using marijuana recently (in the last month), with 63.3% of them being men. Compared with nonusers, marijuana users were often younger (18-34 years; 73.8% versus 61%), non-Hispanic white or black, and with some college education. Marijuana users were often physically active (81.8% versus 77.5%), heavy drinkers (16.8% versus 4.9%), current combustible cigarette users (37.9% versus 15%) and had lower prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia as compared with nonusers (P<0.01). Young adults with recent marijuana use showed 1.82× higher odds (adjusted odds ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.08-3.10]) of stroke compared with nonusers, which further increased to 2.45× higher (adjusted odds ratio, 2.45 [95% CI, 1.31-4.60]) among frequent marijuana users (>10 days/month). Compared with nonusers, stroke odds were even higher among frequent marijuana users with concomitant combustible cigarette use (adjusted odds ratio, 3.12 [95% CI, 1.40-6.97]) and e-cigarette use (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.07-6.46]), respectively. Conclusions- There may be a significantly higher odds of stroke in young marijuana users (18-44 years) as compared with nonusers with even greater odds among frequent users (>10 days/month).


Subject(s)
Health Risk Behaviors , Marijuana Use , Stroke , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Marijuana Use/adverse effects , Marijuana Use/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...