Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 45(5): 1000-1005, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29452829

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: All successful endonasal surgery, including functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), depends on knowledge of both anatomy and the specific variations that can occur between and within patients. Familiarity with these structures is a critical component in preventing complications from these procedures, and failure to understand subtle variation can have disastrous results. The aim of this study was to characterize the anatomical variations (if any) of the cribriform plate using a large cadaveric sample set. Better understanding of the disparities within and between patients may have important implications for surgical planning. METHODS: Whole human skull specimens (31 specimens, 62 sides) were examined to obtain dimensional measurements of the cribriform plate on the right and left sides. RESULTS: The average length of the cribriform plate was 21.28mm (range 15.25-27.73mm, SD 3.30mm). The average width of the cribriform plate (including the crista galli) was 4.53mm (range 1.75-8.03mm, SD 1.20mm). When comparing side differences in individual specimens, there was more variability between widths, relative standard deviation 26.4%, than between lengths, relative standard deviation 15.5%. CONCLUSION: There is a range of both length and width of the cribriform plate, between and within individuals. This is particularly true for width. In practice, this emphasizes the importance of pre-operative imaging and recognition of anatomic variability for sinus or anterior skull base procedure.


Subject(s)
Anatomic Variation , Ethmoid Bone/anatomy & histology , Cadaver , Endoscopy , Humans , Organ Size , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery
2.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 140(10): 951-5, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25170573

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Normal olfaction provides essential cues to allow early detection and avoidance of potentially hazardous situations. Thus, patients with impaired olfaction may be at increased risk of experiencing certain hazardous events such as cooking or house fires, delayed detection of gas leaks, and exposure to or ingestion of toxic substances. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors and potential trends over time in olfactory-related hazardous events in patients with impaired olfactory function. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of 1047 patients presenting to a university smell and taste clinic between 1983 and 2013. A total of 704 patients had both clinical olfactory testing and a hazard interview and were studied. On the basis of olfactory function testing results, patients were categorized as normosmic (n = 161), mildly hyposmic (n = 99), moderately hyposmic (n = 93), severely hyposmic (n = 142), and anosmic (n = 209). INTERVENTIONS: Patient evaluation including interview, examination, and olfactory testing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incidence of specific olfaction-related hazardous events (ie, burning pots and/or pans, starting a fire while cooking, inability to detect gas leaks, inability to detect smoke, and ingestion of toxic substances or spoiled foods) by degree of olfactory impairment. RESULTS: The incidence of having experienced any hazardous event progressively increased with degree of impairment: normosmic (18.0%), mildly hyposmic (22.2%), moderately hyposmic (31.2%), severely hyposmic (32.4%), and anosmic (39.2%). Over 3 decades there was no significant change in the overall incidence of hazardous events. Analysis of demographic data (age, sex, race, smoking status, and etiology) revealed significant differences in the incidence of hazardous events based on age (among 397 patients <65 years, 148 [37.3%] with hazardous event, vs 31 of 146 patients ≥65 years [21.3%]; P < .001), sex (among 278 women, 106 [38.1%] with hazardous event, vs 73 of 265 men [27.6%]; P = .009), and race (among 98 African Americans, 41 [41.8%] with hazardous event, vs 134 of 434 whites [30.9%]; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increased level of olfactory impairment portends an increased risk of experiencing a hazardous event. Risk is further impacted by individuals' age, sex, and race. These results may assist health care practitioners in counseling patients on the risks associated with olfactory impairment.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Home , Olfaction Disorders/complications , Aged , Cooking , Female , Fires , Food Contamination , Fossil Fuels , Hazardous Substances , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odorants , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoke
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...