Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N Engl J Med ; 381(17): 1644-1652, 2019 10 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31597037

ABSTRACT

Genome sequencing is often pivotal in the diagnosis of rare diseases, but many of these conditions lack specific treatments. We describe how molecular diagnosis of a rare, fatal neurodegenerative condition led to the rational design, testing, and manufacture of milasen, a splice-modulating antisense oligonucleotide drug tailored to a particular patient. Proof-of-concept experiments in cell lines from the patient served as the basis for launching an "N-of-1" study of milasen within 1 year after first contact with the patient. There were no serious adverse events, and treatment was associated with objective reduction in seizures (determined by electroencephalography and parental reporting). This study offers a possible template for the rapid development of patient-customized treatments. (Funded by Mila's Miracle Foundation and others.).


Subject(s)
Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Mutagenesis, Insertional , Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses/drug therapy , Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses/genetics , Oligonucleotides, Antisense/therapeutic use , Precision Medicine , Rare Diseases/drug therapy , Biopsy , Child , Child Development , Drug Discovery , Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Neuropsychological Tests , RNA, Messenger , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/drug therapy , Skin/pathology , Whole Genome Sequencing
3.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 233(12): 1498-503, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18849547

ABSTRACT

This article discusses the current ambiguous state of federal regulatory agency control over pharmacogenomic testing, a subset of genetic testing that combines information about genetic variability with pharmacology in order to improve drug recommendations. An analysis of the common three terms used to evaluate regulation of pharmacogenomic testing: research validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility, followed by a case study involving U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation of laboratory developed tests, illustrates the present gap in pharmacogenomic oversight. The existing agency overlap in regulating pharmacogenomic testing leads to unclear or even contradictory authoritative advice.


Subject(s)
Pharmacogenetics , United States Food and Drug Administration , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Approval , Drug Industry , Ethical Review , Ethics Committees, Research , Genetic Research , Genetic Testing , Government Regulation , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Pharmacology, Clinical , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...