The role of healthcare leaders in implementing equitable clinical academic pathways for nurses: An integrative review.

AIM: To identify and synthesize empirical evidence on the role of healthcare leaders in the development of equitable clinical academic pathways for nurses. DESIGN: Integrative literature review. DATA SOURCES: Literature was searched using CINAHL, PubMed, ProQuest and Google Scholar databases. REVIEW METHODS: A total of 114 eligible articles published between 2010 and2022 were screened, 16 papers were selected. RESULTS: Results highlighted the need for consistent national, regional, and organizational policy approaches to developing clinical academic careers for nurses. Government health departments and National Health boards must focus on increasing engagement in research and evidence-based nursing practice for high-quality patient care. Discriminatory practices and attitudes were identified as barriers. Discrimination due to gender was evident, while the impact of race, ethnicity, and other social categories of identity are under-researched. Educational leaders must unravel misconceptions about research, highlighting its relevance to patient care and bedside nurses' work. Academic leaders together with executive nurses, research funders and professional nursing bodies must create appropriately remunerated career structures. Transformative approaches are required to develop the clinical academic nurse role and understand its value in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Multiple elements exist within complex systems that healthcare leaders can navigate collaboratively to develop and implement clinical nurse academic roles. This requires vision, acknowledgement of the value of nursing research and the importance of evidence-based research infrastructures. IMPACT: Findings highlight the collaborative role of healthcare leaders as critical to the success of critical academic careers for nurses. This review can inform those still to formalize this innovative role for nurses. REPORTING METHOD: The review complies with the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. This paper contributes evidence about the healthcare leader's role in developing clinical academic pathways for nurses to the wider global clinical community. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was included in this review.

Conceptualising relational care from an Indigenous Maori perspective: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the attributes of relational care from an Indigenous Maori healthcare consumer perspective. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL Plus, Ovid MEDLINE, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health, Scopus, New Zealand Index, the Ministry of Health Library, New Zealand Research and Google Scholar were searched between 23 and 30 May 2022. METHODS: This scoping review used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, thematic analysis and the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework for the synthesis of the findings. RESULTS: A total of 1449 records were identified, and 10 sources were selected for final review. We identified five relational attributes that were most important to Maori: (1) the expressive behaviours and characteristics of healthcare professionals (HCPs), (2) communication to facilitate the healthcare partnership, (3) appreciating differing worldviews, (4) the context in which healthcare is delivered and (5) whanaungatanga (meaningful relationships). CONCLUSION: The relational attributes identified are inextricably linked. Connecting with HCPs and developing a therapeutic relationship is fundamental to improving consumer experience and engagement with mainstream healthcare services. Whanaungatanga is fundamental to meaningful engagements with HCPs. Future research should explore how relational care is practiced in acute care settings when clinician-consumer interactions are time-limited, examine how the health system influences the capacity for relational care and how Indigenous and Western paradigms can co-exist in healthcare. IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review can inform future projects addressing health equity for Indigenous communities by creating environments that prioritise culturally safe relational care and value Indigenous knowledge systems. REPORTING METHOD: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indigenous Maori experiences of fundamental care delivery in an acute inpatient setting: A qualitative analysis of feedback survey data.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore inpatient healthcare delivery experiences of Maori (New Zealand's Indigenous people) patients and their whanau (extended family network) at a large tertiary hospital in New Zealand to (a) determine why Maori are less satisfied with the relational and psychosocial aspects of fundamental care delivery compared to other ethnic groups; (b) identify what aspects of care delivery are most important to them; and (c) contribute to the refinement of the Fundamentals of Care framework to have a deeper application of Indigenous concepts that support health and well-being. BACKGROUND: Bi-annual Fundamentals of Care audits at the study site have shown that Maori are more dissatisfied with aspects of fundamental care delivery than other ethnic groups. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of narrative feedback from survey data using an exploratory descriptive qualitative approach. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-four questionnaires containing narrative patient experience feedback were collected from the study site's patient experience survey reporting system. Content analysis was used to analyse the data in relation to the Fundamentals of Care framework and Maori concepts of health and well-being. The research complies with the SRQR guidelines for reporting qualitative research. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: being treated with kindness and respect; communication and partnership; family is the fundamental support structure; and inclusion of culture in the delivery of care. CONCLUSION: The current iteration of the Fundamentals of Care framework does not reflect in depth how indigenous groups view health and healthcare delivery. The inclusion of an Indigenous paradigm in the framework could improve healthcare delivery experiences of Indigenous peoples. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Research around the application and relevance of the Fundamentals of Care framework to Indigenous groups provides an opportunity to refine the framework to improve health equity, and healthcare delivery for Indigenous people.