Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The adaptation of interim crowns made by subtractive and additive manufacturing has not been well investigated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the internal fit and marginal discrepancy of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A dentoform mandibular left first molar was prepared for a ceramic crown and scanned for the fabrication of 48 stereolithical resin dies and interim crowns. Group CAM included 16 ZCAD interim crowns made by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology; group 3DP, 16 NextDent MFH interim crowns made by digital light processing technology; and group APP, 16 Jet interim crowns manually made by using autopolymerizing acrylic resin and used as controls. The silicone replica technique was used to determine the internal discrepancy volume before definitive cementation. All crowns were cemented with Temp-Bond NE under a 50-N load and bench set for 10 minutes before microcomputed tomographic (µCT) scan assessment. The volume of cement space was measured by using the µCT scan 3-dimensional (3D) images, and gap distance at assigned locations was recorded by using the µCT scan 2-dimensional (2D) images. The marginal discrepancy was measured by the polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression technique and using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey honestly significant difference tests (α=.05). The association between different measuring techniques was analyzed by the Pearson correlation test. RESULTS: The gap distance between interim crowns and dies from all 3 groups measured by using the µCT scan 2D images ranged from 0.13 mm to 0.55 mm, with the highest value found at the central occlusal location in group APP. The total average gap distance values recorded for group APP were significantly higher than those for group CAM and group 3DP (P<.05). No significant differences were found in internal discrepancy and cement space volume between group CAM and group 3DP (P>.05). The Pearson correlation test showed a moderate correlation (r=0.69) between the silicone replica technique and the µCT scan technique in determining cement space volume. When the PVS impression technique was used to measure the marginal discrepancy, the mean values obtained from group APP were statistically significantly higher than those from group CAM and group 3DP (P<.05). No statistically significant difference in marginal discrepancy was found between group CAM and group 3DP (P=.70). CONCLUSIONS: Digitally fabricated interim crowns had better internal fit and smaller marginal discrepancy than manually constructed interim crowns. The silicone replica technique and µCT scan technique measurements had a moderate correlation in assessing the adaptation of cemented interim crowns.

Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.

PURPOSE: To compare the internal fit and marginal discrepancy of acrylic resin interim crowns fabricated by different manufacturing methods, and to test the consistency of measuring marginal discrepancy and internal fit between different measuring techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dentoform mandibular left first molar was prepared for an all-ceramic crown. Thirty-six interim crowns were fabricated and divided into three groups (n = 12): group BAC (Bis-acrylic composite, fabricated manually), group CAM (CAD/CAM polymethylmethacrylate resin, milled), and group 3DP (3D printed methacrylic oligomers, printed). The internal fit of the interim crowns was evaluated by the silicone replica technique and by X-ray microcomputed tomography (µCT) technique. The marginal discrepancy of the interim crowns was evaluated by the vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) (Aquasil Ultra XLV) impression technique and by optical coherence tomography (OCT) technique. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Turkey tests at α = 0.05. Pearson correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation between the different measurement techniques and marginal discrepancy/internal fit. RESULTS: The manually fabricated interim crowns (group BAC) had significantly greater discrepancy of internal fit than did the digitally fabricated crowns (group CAM and group 3DP) measured by both silicone replica technique and µCT 2-dimensional (2D) image measurement. There were no statistically significant differences in the cement space volume values obtained by the µCT image technique between group BAC and group 3DP (p = 0.285). The coefficient of determination between the two volumetric measurement techniques was low (R2 = 0.30). For marginal discrepancy, the manually fabricated interim crowns had a wider absolute marginal discrepancy than both digitally fabricated groups (p < 0.05). In both the VPS impression and OCT assessment, there was no statistically significant difference between group CAM and group 3DP (p = 0.798 and 0.994, respectively). The coefficient of determination between the VPS impression and OCT techniques for marginal discrepancy measurement was low (R2 = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Digitally fabricated interim crowns (group CAM and group 3DP) had better internal fit and smaller marginal discrepancy than manually fabricated interim crowns (group BAC). For comparison of the different evaluation techniques, the silicone replica technique and µCT measurements had low correlation for internal fit assessment, as did the PVS impression and OCT techniques for marginal discrepancy test.