Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 29(3): 287-296, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36126200

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Foodborne disease surveillance and outbreak investigations are foundational to the prevention and control of foodborne disease in the United States, where contaminated foods cause an estimated 48 million illnesses, 128 000 hospitalizations, and 3000 deaths each year. Surveillance activities and rapid detection and investigation of foodborne disease outbreaks require a trained and coordinated workforce across epidemiology, environmental health, and laboratory programs. PROGRAM: Under the 2011 Food Safety Modernization Act, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was called on to establish Integrated Food Safety (IFS) Centers of Excellence (CoEs) at state health departments, which would collaborate with academic partners, to identify, implement, and evaluate model practices in foodborne disease surveillance and outbreak response and to serve as a resource for public health professionals. IMPLEMENTATION: CDC designated 5 IFS CoEs in August 2012 in Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Oregon, and Tennessee; a sixth IFS CoE in New York was added in August 2014. For the August 2019-July 2024 funding period, 5 IFS CoEs were designated in Colorado, Minnesota, New York, Tennessee, and Washington. Each IFS CoE is based at the state health department that partners with at least one academic institution. EVALUATION: IFS CoEs have built capacity across public health agencies by increasing the number of workforce development opportunities (developing >70 trainings, tools, and resources), supporting outbreak response activities (responding to >50 requests for outbreak technical assistance annually), mentoring students, and responding to emerging issues, such as changing laboratory methods and the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Foodborne Diseases , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Population Surveillance , COVID-19/epidemiology , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Food Safety , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control
2.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24(1): 34-40, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28257403

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: In 2011, the Food Safety and Modernization Act established Integrated Food Safety Centers of Excellence across the United States to train, educate, and enhance the skill of foodborne illness outbreak investigation teams. To target regional training efforts, the New York Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence (NYCoE) identified training needs in food safety and foodborne illness investigations among public heath staff in 11 states and 1 large metropolitan area in the Northeast. OBJECTIVE: To identify topics so as to develop training materials relevant to food safety and foodborne disease outbreaks in order to improve and impact foodborne outbreak investigations regionally and nationally. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, paper-based survey conducted in January-February 2016. SETTING: Eleven Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states, and 1 large metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Foodborne illness outbreak investigators in the NYCoE region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of training needs, as self-reported by participants, regarding general foodborne outbreak investigation needs and those specific to epidemiologists, environmental health specialists, and laboratorians. Topics included basic food safety/processing knowledge, communication and metrics, and training formats. Information regarding demographics, utility of the NYCoE, and certificate programs was also collected. RESULTS: Surveys returned from 33 respondents (from 10 states and 1 metropolitan area) identified metrics (100%), increasing use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (85%), and guidance on implementation of the Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (guidelines (89%) as the top training needs. By field, epidemiologists cited training in applying whole genome sequencing (100%), environmental health specialists cited training on the National Outbreak Reporting System (67%), and laboratorians cited training on whole genome sequencing (91%) as important. Short, online, or in-person, 1- to 2-day trainings were the preferred training formats (≥91%). Respondents wanted certificate programs in food safety (73%). CONCLUSION: New diagnostic and molecular techniques are highly desirable topics for trainings, as is understanding national guidelines and outcome measures. Shorter and hands-on training formats, as well as certificate programs, are desirable. The NYCoE used the results of this survey to (i) select training topics for a Food Safety symposium conducted in July 2016 and to (ii) drive other activities.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Food Safety/methods , Foodborne Diseases , Needs Assessment/trends , Teaching/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Mid-Atlantic Region , New England , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL