ABSTRACT
Shoulder disorders are common in the general populationâ: they occur in about 25 of every 1000 patients per year. A rather large majority are caused by cuff disorders. Differentiating between impingement and cuff rupture is essential to adequate treatment. Clinical tests have been developed, but their accuracy is limited. This study was performed to improve clinical accuracy by combining single tests and adding a subacromial injection. We postulated that the empty can and drop arm tests would result in higher sensitivity and specificity after subacromial injection. METHOD: We prospectively assessed 49 patients with the empty can and drop arm tests and used ultrasound to compare the individual and combined results. RESULT: The ultrasound found six cuff ruptures. Specificity improved and sensitivity decreased after subacromial injection. CONCLUSION: Only specificity improved after subacromial injection. Combining the test results led to an increase in both sensitivity and specificity without injection.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Physical Examination/methods , Rotator Cuff Injuries/diagnosis , Rotator Cuff Injuries/drug therapy , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/diagnosis , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Rotator Cuff Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Rupture , Sensitivity and Specificity , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
A total of 159 patients (84 women and 75 men, mean age of 53 (20 to 87)) with subacromial impingement were randomised to treatment with subacromial injections using lidocaine with one of hyaluronic acid (51 patients), corticosteroid (53 patients) or placebo (55 patients). Patients were followed up for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was pain on a visual analogue score (VAS), and secondary outcomes included the Constant Murley score, shoulder pain score, functional mobility score, shoulder disability questionnaire and pain-specific disability score. The different outcome measures showed similar results. After three, six and 12 weeks corticosteroid injections were superior to hyaluronic acid injections and only at six weeks significantly better than placebo injections. The mean short-term reduction in pain on the VAS score at 12 weeks was 7% (SD 2.7; 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.207 to 1.55; p = 0.084) in the hyaluronic acid group, 28% (SD 2.8; 97.5% CI 1.86 to 3.65; p < 0.001) in the corticosteroid group and 23% (SD 3.23; 97.5% CI 1.25 to 3.26; p < 0.001) in the placebo group. At 26 weeks there was a reduction in pain in 63% (32 of 51) of patients in the hyaluronic acid group, 72% (38 of 53) of those in the corticosteroid group and 69% (38 of 55) of those in the placebo group. We were not able to show a convincing benefit from hyaluronic acid injections compared with corticosteroid or placebo injections. Corticosteroid injections produced a significant reduction in pain in the short term (three to 12 weeks), but in the long term the placebo injection produced the best results.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Arthralgia/prevention & control , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Arthralgia/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/complications , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability and accuracy of sonographic (US) acromiohumeral distance (AHD) measurement for both experienced and novice operators in US in patients suffering from subacromial impingement syndrome. METHOD: A total of 43 patients (50 shoulders) diagnosed with subacromial impingement syndrome were recruited from an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The US measurement of AHD was obtained consecutively in a neutral position and in a 60 degrees abduction position. A total of 300 blinded measurements were taken. RESULT: In the neutral abduction group the intra- observer interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.94 for the experienced operator and 0.92 for the novice operator. The inter-observer ICC was 0.70 and the accuracy was 1.1 mm. In the 60 degrees abduction group, the intra-observer ICC was 0.90 for the experienced operator and 0.87 for the novice operator. The inter-observer ICC was 0.64 and the accuracy was 1.4 mm. All ICCs were significant at a level of p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: The inaccuracy of the method was 1 mm regardless of the experience of the observer. US AHD measurement in patients with shoulder complaints is not as accurate as reported in healthy subjects. This may have important implications for the clinical use of this parameter.
