Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld™) Prophylaxis Prevents Breakthrough COVID-19 Infections in Immunosuppressed Population: 6-Month Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Persons with neuroinflammatory diseases (pwNID) treated with potent immunosuppressives are at risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes and reduced vaccine seroconversion. We aimed at determining the real-world efficacy of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld™) in immunosuppressed pwNID in preventing breakthrough COVID-19 infections. METHODS: 31 immunosuppressed pwNID were followed for 6 months after administration of tixagevimab and cilgavimab as a prophylactic COVID-19 medication (January 2022-July 2022). Only pwNID treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators were considered eligible for the study. A control group of 126 immunosuppressed pwNID (38 seropositive and 88 seronegative after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination) were included. Breakthrough COVID-19 infections rate and their severity was determined over the follow-up. RESULTS: The pwNID treated with tixagevimab and cilgavimab had more comorbidities when compared with the total and seronegative pwNID control group (54.8% vs. 30.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.02 and p = 0.005, respectively). After a 6-month follow-up, significantly lower numbers of pwNID treated with tixagevimab and cilgavimab had breakthrough COVID-19 when compared with the control pwNID group (6.5% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.002) and seronegative control pwNID group (6.5% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.001). All COVID-19 infections in Evusheld-treated pwNID were mild, whereas 9/43 COVID-19 infections in the control group were moderate/severe. No side effects to tixagevimab and cilgavimab were recorded. CONCLUSION: In pwNID treated with immunosuppressive therapies, tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld™) significantly reduced the numbers and severity of breakthrough COVID-19 infections during the Omicron (BA.2-BA.5 variants) wave.

Communicating the relevance of neurodegeneration and brain atrophy to multiple sclerosis patients: patient, provider and researcher perspectives.

Central nervous system (CNS) atrophy provides valuable additional evidence of an ongoing neurodegeneration independent of lesion accrual in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, there are limitations for interpretation of CNS volume changes at individual patient-level. Patients are receiving information on the topic of atrophy through various sources, including media, patient support groups and conferences, and discussions with their providers. Whether or not the topic of CNS atrophy should be proactively discussed with PwMS during office appointments is currently controversial. This commentary/perspective article represents perspectives of PwMS, providers and researchers with recommendations for minimizing confusion and anxiety, and facilitating proactive discussion about brain atrophy, as an upcoming routine measure in evaluating disease progression and treatment response monitoring. The following recommendations were created based on application of patient's and provider's surveys, and various workshops held over a period of 2 years: (1) PwMS should receive basic information on understanding of brain functional anatomy, and explanation of inflammation and neurodegeneration; (2) the expertise for atrophy measurements should be characterized as evolving; (3) quality patient education materials on these topics should be provided; (4) the need for standardization of MRI exams has to be explained and communicated; (5) providers should discuss background on volumetric changes, including references to normal aging; (6) the limitations of brain volume assessments at an individual-level should be explained; (7) the timing and language used to convey this information should be individualized based on the patient's background and disease status; (8) a discussion guide may be a very helpful resource for use by providers/staff to support these discussions; (9) understanding the role of brain atrophy and other MRI metrics may elicit greater patient satisfaction and acceptance of the value of therapies that have proven efficacy around these outcomes; (10) the areas that represent possibilities for positive self-management of MS symptoms that foster hope for improvement should be emphasized, and in particular regarding use of physical and mental exercise that build or maintain brain reserve through increased network efficiency, and (11) an additional time during clinical visits should be allotted to discuss these topics, including creation of specific educational programs.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Multiple Sclerosis and Inflammatory Diseases: Effects from Disease-Modifying Therapy, Long-Term Seroprevalence and Breakthrough Infections.

Background: To determine the effect of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) on humoral postvaccine seroconversion, long-term humoral response, and breakthrough COVID-19 infections in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and other neuroinflammatory disorders. Methods: A total of 757 PwMS and other neuroinflammatory disorders were recruited in two MS centers and vaccinated with one of the FDA-approved vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, Ad26.COV2.S). The primary outcomes are the rate of humoral postvaccine seroconversion and anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin G (IgG) differences between patients on different DMTs. Secondary measures include breakthrough infections and humoral response after six months. Other outcomes include differences in vaccine response between SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the effects of age and comorbidities on the vaccine response. Results: A total of 465 (68.4%) PwMS and 55 (74.3%) patients with neuroinflammatory diseases were seropositive at 4−12 weeks after vaccination. A significant difference in seroconversion based on the DMT used at the time of vaccination (p < 0.001) was observed, with the lowest rates seen in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies (23.2%) and sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators (S1P) (30.8%). In seropositive patients, there was a significant decrease in anti-SARS IgG from mean 20.0 to 4.7 at six months (p = 0.004). Thirty-nine patients had breakthrough infection, but only two seronegative patients required hospitalization. mRNA vaccines resulted in significantly greater seroconversion compared to Ad26.COV2.S (p < 0.001). Older age and presence of cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with lower anti-SARS IgG (p = 0.021 and p = 0.003, respectively) Conclusions: PwMS and neuroinflammatory disorders treated with anti-CD20 and S1P medications have lower humoral response after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, even after booster dose. Waning of the humoral response puts vaccinated PwMS at a greater risk of COVID-19 breakthrough.