Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Res ; 31(2): 257-67, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22968826

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study was to determine the effects of peak knee valgus angle and peak knee abductor moment on the anterior, medial, and lateral tibial translations (ATT, MTT, LTT) in the "at risk" female knee during drop landing. Fifteen female subjects performed drop landings from 40 cm. Three-dimension knee motion was simultaneously recorded using a high speed, biplane fluoroscopy system, and a video-based motion analysis system. Valgus knee angles and knee abduction moments were stratified into low, intermediate, and high groups and peak ATT, MTT, and LTT were compared between these groups with ANOVA (α = 0.05). Significant differences were observed between stratified groups in peak knee valgus angle (p < 0.0001) and peak knee abduction moment (p < 0.0001). However, no corresponding differences in peak ATT, LTT, and MTT between groups exhibiting low to high-peak knee valgus angles (ATT: p = 0.80; LTT: p = 0.25; MTT: p = 0.72); or, in peak ATT (p = 0.61), LTT (p = 0.26) and MTT (p = 0.96) translations when stratified according to low to high knee abduction moments, were found. We conclude that the healthy female knee is tightly regulated with regard to translations even when motion analysis derived knee valgus angles and abduction moments are high.


Subject(s)
Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
J Biomech ; 45(16): 2935-8, 2012 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23021610

ABSTRACT

While measuring knee motion in all six degrees of freedom is important for understanding and treating orthopaedic knee pathologies, traditional motion capture techniques lack the required accuracy. A variety of model-based biplane fluoroscopy techniques have been developed with sub-millimeter accuracy. However, no studies have statistically evaluated the consistency of the accuracy across motions of varying intensity or between degrees of freedom. Therefore, this study evaluated the bias and precision of a contour-based tracking technique by comparing it to a marker-based method (gold standard) during three movements with increasing intensity. Six cadaveric knees with implanted tantalum markers were used to simulate knee extension, walking and drop landings, while motion was recorded by a custom biplane fluoroscopy system. The 3D geometries of the bones were reconstructed from CT scans and anatomical coordinate systems were assigned. The position and orientation of the bone and marker models were determined for an average of 27 frames for each trial and knee joint kinematics were compared. The average bias and precision was 0.01 ± 0.65° for rotations and 0.01 ± 0.59 mm for joint translations. Rotational precision was affected by motion (p=0.04) and depended on the axis of rotation (p=0.02). However, the difference in average precision among motions or axes was small (≤ 0.13°) and not likely of consequence for kinematic measurements. No other differences were found. The contour-based technique demonstrated sub-millimeter and sub-degree accuracy, indicating it is a highly accurate tool for measuring complex three dimensional knee movements of any intensity.


Subject(s)
Knee Joint/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Femur/physiology , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Models, Biological , Movement/physiology , Rotation , Tibia/physiology
3.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 26(10): 1019-24, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21820780

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research has linked knee extensor moment and knee shear force to the non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury during the landing motion. However, how these biomechanical performance factors relate to knee translations in vivo is not known as knee translations cannot be obtained with traditional motion capture techniques. The purpose of this study was to combine traditional motion capture with high-speed, biplane fluoroscopy imaging to determine relationships between knee extensor moment and knee shear force profiles with anterior and lateral tibial translations occurring during drop landing in female athletes. METHODS: 15 females performed drop landings from a height of 40 cm while being recorded using a high speed, biplane fluoroscopy system and simultaneously being recorded using surface marker motion capture techniques to estimate knee joint angle, reaction force and moment profiles. FINDINGS: No significant statistical relationships were observed between peak anterior or posterior knee shear force and peak anterior and lateral tibial translations; or, between peak knee extensor moment and peak anterior and lateral tibial translations. Although differences were noted in peak shear force (P=0.02) and peak knee extensor moment (P<0.001) after stratification into low and high shear force and moment cohorts, no differences were noted in anterior and lateral tibial translations (all P ≥ 0.18). INTERPRETATION: Females exhibiting high knee extensor moment and knee shear force during drop landings do not yield correspondingly high anterior and lateral tibial translations.


Subject(s)
Knee Joint/physiology , Shear Strength/physiology , Adult , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/physiology , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Postural Balance/physiology , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/physiology
4.
Am J Sports Med ; 39(11): 2338-46, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21300808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical testing for the integrity of the subscapularis muscle includes the belly-press, lift-off, and bear-hug examinations. While these tests have been widely applied in clinical practice, there is considerable variation in arm positioning within each clinical examination. HYPOTHESIS: To determine the ideal arm and shoulder positions for isolating the subscapularis muscle while performing the bear-hug, belly-press, and lift-off tests. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: The activity of 7 muscles was monitored in 20 healthy participants: upper and lower divisions of the subscapularis, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, latissimus dorsi, teres major, triceps, pectoralis major. Electromyogram data were collected and compared across each clinical test at varying arm positions: bear-hug (ideal position, 10° superior, 10° inferior to the shoulder line), belly-press (ideal position, maximum shoulder external rotation, and maximal shoulder internal rotation), and lift-off (ideal position, hand position 5 in. [12.7 cm] superior and 5 in. [12.7 cm] inferior to the midlumbar spine). RESULTS: Regardless of arm and shoulder position, the upper and lower subscapularis muscle activities were significantly greater than all other muscles while performing each test. No significant differences were observed between the upper and lower subscapularis divisions at any position within and across the 3 tests. There were no significant differences in subscapularis electromyogram activities across the 3 tests. CONCLUSION: The level of subscapularis muscle activation was similar among the bear-hug, belly-press, and lift-off tests. The 3 tests activated the subscapularis significantly more than all other muscles tested but were not different from one another when compared across tests and positions. Although the bear-hug and lift-off tests have been described to activate differential portions of the subscapularis, the findings of this study do not support the preferential testing of a specific subscapular division across the 3 tests. As such, all 3 tests are effective in testing the integrity of the entire subscapularis muscle, although there does not appear to be an ideal position for selectively testing its divisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians may feel comfortable in using any of the 3 tests, depending on the patient, to isolate the function of the subscapularis as a single muscle. Furthermore, clinicians should not solely focus on a patient's arm position when administering an examination but also compare the affected arm to the contralateral shoulder when appropriate.


Subject(s)
Arm/physiology , Electromyography/methods , Exercise Test/methods , Shoulder/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Physical Examination , Rotation , Rotator Cuff/physiopathology , Tendon Injuries/diagnosis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...