Leprosy-related joint involvement.

We estimate the prevalence and evaluate the clinical characteristics of leprosy related arthritis. One thousand, two hundred fifty-seven leprosy patients were attended at "Alfredo da Matta" outpatient clinic in the state of Amazonas, Brazil from July to October 2004. Among them, 115 patients were identified with articular pain and were referred for evaluation with rheumatologist. Blood samples were collected and radiological evaluation of the involved joints was performed. All patients with arthritis who continued to be followed up were reevaluated. One hundred fifteen leprosy patients (9.1%) were identified with articular involvement. The articular complaints were attributed to a defined rheumatic disease in 36 cases and excluded from further analysis. Twenty-four patients had arthralgia, and 55 (37 males and 18 females) had leprosy-related arthritis. The prevalence of arthritis was similar in both genders, and all patients with leprosy-related arthritis had lepromatous or borderline type. Most of patients had polyarticular and symmetrical arthritis and had completed the multidrug therapy and was under reaction treatment. The mean duration of articular symptoms at the time of study was 1.06 years (ranging from 5 days to 14 years). Ninety-one percent of patients with leprosy-related arthritis presented erythema nodosum leprosum or reversal reactions. Only five patients with arthritis had never presented reactions. Fifty percent of patients became asymptomatic during the mean 24 months of follow-up. Leprosy-related arthritis has a lower prevalence than previously reported. Most cases of leprosy-related arthritis were associated with reactional episodes, and in a large number of cases, the arthritis had a chronic course not responsive to the conventional therapy for reactions.

Enhancement in the histological diagnosis of leprosy in patients with only sensory loss by demonstration of mycobacterial antigens using anti-BCG polyclonal antibodies.

This study was undertaken to assess whether the immunoperoxidase technique using anti-BCG serum is able to confirm the diagnosis of early leprosy among patients whose unique clinical manifestation is a localized area of sensory loss, in a higher proportion than the routine mycobacterial staining methods, namely hematoxylin-eosin and Wade. The study was held in the north of a hyper-endemic area of leprosy, Manaus, Amazonas (Brazil). Fifty-one paraffin-embedded skin biopsy blocks were retrieved and processed for the immunohistochemical study, by means of anti-BCG polyclonal antibodies for the detection of mycobacterial antigens. The routine stains confirmed the leprosy diagnosis in 17% of the cases, while the immunostaining method confirmed it in 47%. The McNemar test showed that the observed difference between these two techniques was statistically significant (p = < 0.05). In the same way, 50 blocks of skin conditions considered in the differential histopathological diagnosis of early leprosy were processed for the immunohistochemical test to analyze the possibility of false-positive results which occurred in 8 (16%) patients. The study suggests that immunostaining may increase the proportion of the routine histological diagnosis of leprosy in patients who have sensory loss only, even while using biopsies obtained in fieldwork conditions. This is very advantageous in hyper-endemic areas and in areas that are in the post-elimination period of leprosy control where sensory loss may be a sentinel sign of the disease.

Early diagnosis and treatment of leprosy in intradomiciliary contacts in a high prevalence area: Amazon region.

The importance of dermato-neurological examination of intradomiciliary contacts is well known as an important secondary preventive measure in leprosy control, due to the fact that it allows early diagnosis and treatment. This is an intervention trial in an area of high leprosy prevalence (Manaus/Brazil) where the proportion of contacts examined is low. The aim of the study is to assess whether a simple educational session conducted among patients increases contacts examination and leads to early case detection. The intervention group had examined more contacts (p < 0.05) but, paradoxically, presented fewer new cases than the control group. The authors discuss the probable causes for this unexpected outcome, the advantages of the intervention and other related issues.