Ohio Abortion Regulations and Ethical Dilemmas for Obstetrician-Gynecologists.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze obstetrician-gynecologists' (ob-gyns') experiences with, and perspectives on, how Ohio's abortion-restrictive regulatory landscape affects their health care practices. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2020, we conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups with ob-gyns (N=35) who had practiced in Ohio for at least 6 months between 2010 and 2020. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically using ATLAS.ti software. RESULTS: Participants perceived Ohio abortion regulations affecting their practice in three key ways: abortion regulations framed abortion and physicians who provide abortion as separate and distinct from other medical practices and physicians; many institutional interpretations of abortion regulations undermined physician expertise and professional autonomy; and the constellation of abortion regulations, institutional interpretations, physicians' trepidation, and their perceived inability to exercise clinical judgment worked together to limit abortion access and increase risks to patients' lives and health. The combined factors left participants feeling distraught that they were unable to practice medicine in an ethical and compassionate manner. CONCLUSION: Ohio abortion regulations limit ob-gyns' ability to provide comprehensive reproductive health care, creating ethical dilemmas for these physicians as they attempt to care for their patients. As Ohio's abortion laws increase in number and restrictiveness, they further undermine obstetric and gynecologic ethical practice guidelines. However, medical institutions play a key role in determining abortion provision in Ohio; through their interpretation of the law, institutions can demonstrate support or further limit ob-gyns' ability to exercise clinical judgment and provide ethical, compassionate care to their patients. Considerable work remains to bring Ohio's abortion regulations, institutional interpretations, and physician practices into alignment with professional clinical practice and ethics guidelines.

Development and Feasibility Testing of a Video Game to Reduce High-Risk Heterosexual Behavior in Spanish-Speaking Latinx Adolescents: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Similar to broader health disparities, Latinx adolescents have higher rates of high-risk sexual behavior resulting in pregnancy rates that are 2 times higher and sexually transmitted infection rates that are 5 to 8 times higher than non-Hispanic, white adolescents. Novel approaches are needed to reduce high-risk sexual behavior among Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents who represent the fastest-growing group of US immigrants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to partner with Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents in a participatory design process to develop and test a Spanish-language video game intervention to decrease high-risk heterosexual behavior. METHODS: This is an iterative, two-phase, mixed methods study. In phase 1, we conducted focus groups with Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents to elicit feedback on the content and format of an existing English-language video game. Feedback was then incorporated into an expanded and culturally adapted Spanish-language video game. In phase 2, we pilot tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the new Spanish-language video game intervention by measuring known antecedents to sexual behavior (intentions, self-efficacy, risk perception, and knowledge) assessed at enrollment and 12-week follow-up. We applied a thematic analysis to examine focus group feedback and a bivariate analysis to analyze pre- and postquantitative data. RESULTS: In phase 1, 15 Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents provided feedback for further video game development. A Spanish-language video game was then produced and tested in phase 2. We recruited and enrolled 24 Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents aged 15 to 17 years. Participants played the video game for an average of 4.2 hours during monitored sessions. Pilot testing demonstrated feasibility and acceptability; 65% (3/20) of participants stated that they would play it again, and 65% (3/20) said they would recommend it to friends. Condom-specific knowledge did significantly increase between baseline and follow-up (P=.007). Other variables of sexual behavior antecedents did not differ significantly between baseline and 12-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: An iterative participatory design process in partnership with Spanish-speaking adolescents produced an innovative and acceptable Spanish-language video game intervention aimed at decreasing high-risk sexual behavior in adolescents. Pilot testing demonstrated preliminary feasibility and yielded essential information for further video game development.

Is Periconceptional Substance Use Associated with Unintended Pregnancy?

Background: To evaluate the relationship between periconceptional (period before and/or after conception) substance use and unfavorable pregnancy contexts, including unintended pregnancy. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of English- or Spanish-speaking women aged 16-44 years with pregnancies <24 weeks' gestation presenting to pregnancy testing clinics and enrolled between June 2014 and June 2015. Participants self-reported periconceptional substance use (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, and other illicit substances during the 3 months before enrollment), and pregnancy "contexts," including pregnancy intention, wantedness, planning, timing, desirability, and happiness. Multivariable logistic regression was performed adjusting for potential confounding variables. Results: We enrolled 123 women, averaging 27 ± 6 years, and mean gestational age 7.5 ± 3.0 weeks. Most participants were black, non-Hispanic (37%), or Hispanic (46%), and chose to complete the study in English (69%). Sixty-five percent participants reported use of one or more substances during prior 3 months: alcohol (54%), tobacco (31%), and marijuana (21%). In multivariate analysis, periconceptional alcohol use was associated with increased odds of unintended or ambivalent pregnancy and unwanted or mixed feelings regarding pregnancy (odds ratios [OR] = 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-10.08 and OR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.07-7.36, respectively). Weekly or daily tobacco use was associated with unhappiness about pregnancy (OR = 7.56, 95% CI 1.65-34.51) and undesired or unsure pregnancy (OR = 4.00, 95% CI 1.14-14.06). Conclusions: Periconceptional alcohol or tobacco use demonstrates increased odds of specific unfavorable pregnancy contexts, including pregnancy described as undesired, unintended, unwanted, and unhappiness with pregnancy. Primary prevention of periconceptional substance use and the negative effects of alcohol and tobacco may be improved by increasing contraception access for women at risk for unfavorable pregnancy contexts.