Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(5): 435-444, 2024 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different quantities of prescribed opioid tablets on patient opioid utilization, postoperative pain and function, and satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized trial enrolling patients undergoing primary ACLR. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 prescription groups: 15, 25, or 35 tablets containing 5-mg oxycodone. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) pain and medication logs, opioid medication satisfaction surveys, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires postoperatively. RESULTS: Among the 180 patients included in the analysis, there was no significant difference in VAS pain scores (p > 0.05), IKDC scores (p > 0.05), morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (p = 0.510) consumed, or patient satisfaction with regard to pain control (p = 0.376) between treatment groups. Seventy-two percent of opioids were consumed in the first 3 days postoperatively, and 83% of patients in the 15-tablet cohort felt that they received the "right amount" of or even "too many" opioids. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of 15 opioid tablets resulted in equivalent pain control, patient satisfaction, and short-term functional outcomes as prescriptions of 25 or 35 opioid tablets after ACLR. Lower prescription quantities of opioid medication may provide equivalent postoperative pain and help to minimize the number of unused opioid doses at risk for possible diversion after ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Prescriptions
2.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 11(2): 23259671221143778, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36798799

ABSTRACT

Background: There is a lack of published information outlining the use of biologics in National Football League (NFL) athletes and limited data to guide biologic treatment strategies. Purpose: To develop a consensus on the use of biologics among NFL team physicians. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: A working group of 6 experts convened a consensus process involving NFL team physicians using validated Delphi methodology. Physicians from 32 NFL teams as well as NFL London were invited to take part. This iterative process was used to define statements on the use of biologics in NFL athletes. A recent scoping review exploring biologics in professional athletes was used to inform the first of 3 rounds of surveys, with statements considered under 7 headings: biologics in general, challenges of treating NFL athletes, terminology/nomenclature, autologous blood products, cell-based therapies, guidance for NFL team physicians, and biologic research in the NFL. In addition to rating agreement, experts were encouraged to propose further items or modifications. Predefined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. For a consensus within the final round, defined a priori, items were included in the final information set if a minimum of 75% of respondents agreed and fewer than 10% disagreed. Results: Physicians from 26 NFL teams and NFL London responded to the initial invitation to participate in the Delphi process; 88.9% of participating team physicians completed the round 1 survey, with response rates of 87.5% in round 2 and 95.2% in round 3. After 3 rounds, 47 statements reached a consensus. A consensus was achieved that platelet-rich plasma has a positive impact on patellar tendinopathy and on symptoms in early osteoarthritis but not for other indications. NFL team physicians agreed that while cell therapies have the potential to improve symptoms, the misrepresentation of uncharacterized preparations as "stem cells" has contributed to the widespread use of unproven therapies. Conclusion: This study established an expert consensus on 47 statements relating to the use of biologics in NFL athletes. In addition to providing clinical guidance for the use of biologics in NFL athletes, this study identified key areas for future focus including the development of athlete education materials.

3.
JSES Int ; 6(5): 828-832, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36081700

ABSTRACT

Background: A patient's decision to undergo an elective orthopedic procedure is largely based on their symptoms and functional limitations. This point where patients choose to undergo surgery is known as the "tipping point." The primary aim of this study is to determine the relationship between demographic parameters and the tipping point for elective rotator cuff repair. The secondary aim is to investigate if the tipping point is associated with mental health. The tertiary aim is to determine if the tipping point changes over time. Methods: Retrospective chart review was used to identify all patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020, with 1 of 3 board-certified orthopedic surgeons. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, revision surgery, or incomplete datasets (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], 12-item short form, demographic information, and surgical history). Preoperative ASES score was designated as the tipping point for an individual patient, with a lower score representing worse shoulder function and therefore a higher tipping point and vice versa. Demographic parameters (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], race, and insurance), hand dominance, and surgical history extracted from chart review were analyzed to determine associations with tipping point. Results: A total of 2153 patients were identified from chart review, with 1731 included in the final analysis. The patients had a mean age of 58.6 ± 9.66 years and a mean BMI of 29.2 ± 6.02 kg/m2. There was no significant difference in mean preoperative ASES score by year for the duration of this study (2015-2019, P = .27). Worker's compensation patients had a significantly lower mean preoperative ASES score than patients with commercial or government insurance (P < .01). Spearman's rank correlations showed no relationship between ASES score and patient demographics (age, sex, BMI, race, and hand dominance) or between ASES and previous orthopedic surgery. Preoperative ASES showed a weakly positive correlation (ρ = 0.26) with 12-item short form mental component score. Multivariate linear regression showed male sex is predictive of a lower tipping point (P < .01), whereas higher BMI, African American race, and history of arthroplasty are predictive of a higher tipping point (P ≤ .02). Conclusion: The tipping point was not demonstrated to change over time in our analysis. Male sex is predictive of a lower tipping point for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, whereas elevated BMI, African American race, worker's compensation insurance, and prior arthroplasty are predictive of a higher tipping point. Also, better mental health function is associated with a lower tipping point.

4.
JSES Int ; 6(1): 104-110, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35141683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management continues to be a challenging aspect of patient care. Lidocaine patches have shown efficacy in reducing pain in other surgical specialties and mixed results in orthopedic trials. We sought to determine the effectiveness of nonprescription lidocaine patches in reducing postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited from 3 surgeons at a single institution. All patients of each surgeon were randomized to a lidocaine patch or control group, with crossover occurring at the midpoint. Experimental group patients received 26 4% lidocaine gel-patches. They were provided written and visual instructions to begin wearing the lidocaine patches during daytime on postoperative day (POD) 2. They were to be switched every 8 hours and removed overnight. Control group patients received normal standard of care but did not receive a placebo control. Exclusion criteria included workmen's compensation claims, age <18 years, history of myocardial infarction, and history of lidocaine or adhesive allergies. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder survey was completed preoperatively and 2-, 6-weeks, 3-, 4.5-, and 6-months postoperatively. A 14-day visual analog scale pain and medication log was completed three times daily following repair. All patients received interscalene nerve block with bupivacaine and general anesthesia. RESULTS: 80 (40 control, 40 lidocaine) patients were enrolled, with 53 completing follow-up. Groups were demographically similar in age (P = .22), gender (P = .20), and body mass index (P = .77). They were similar in tear pattern (P = .95), concomitant acromioplasty (P = .44), concomitant biceps tenodesis (P = .07), and number of anchors used (P = .25). There was no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores at any time points (range P = .28-P = .97). Reported 14-day pain logs were not different between study groups at any time points (range P = .07-P = .99). There was no difference in opioid consumption in the first 14 days after surgery (P = .38). The lidocaine group reported less satisfaction with their pain management beginning in the evening of POD 2 (P = .05). This continued until the afternoon of POD 8 (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Transdermal 4% lidocaine patches are not effective in reducing pain or opioid consumption after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were associated with reduced patient satisfaction.

5.
Clin J Sport Med ; 32(3): 236-247, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33797476

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment of traumatic brain injury in collision athletes, particularly those participating in American football. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases for publications between 1990 and 2019. The following search phrases were used: "concussion," "professional athletes," "collision athletes," "mild traumatic brain injury," "severe traumatic brain injury," "management of concussion," "management of severe traumatic brain injury," and "chronic traumatic encephalopathy." Publications that did not present epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, radiological evaluation, or management were omitted. Classic articles as per senior author recommendations were retrieved through reference review. RESULTS: The results of the literature review yielded 147 references: 21 articles discussing epidemiology, 16 discussing clinical presentation, 34 discussing etiology and pathophysiology, 10 discussing radiological evaluation, 34 articles for on-field management, and 32 articles for medical and surgical management. CONCLUSION: Traumatic brain injuries are frequent in professional collision athletes, and more severe injuries can have devastating and lasting consequences. Although sport-related concussions are well studied in professional American football, there is limited literature on the epidemiology and management of severe traumatic brain injuries. This article reviews the epidemiology, as well as the current practices in sideline evaluation, acute management, and surgical treatment of concussions and severe traumatic brain injury in professional collision athletes. Return-to-play decisions should be based on individual patient symptoms and recovery.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Brain Concussion , Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Football , Athletes , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/epidemiology , Brain Concussion/therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Football/injuries , Humans
6.
J Orthop ; 28: 49-52, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34819714

ABSTRACT

The primary objective of this retrospective study is to compare patient outcomes following a combined approach (MPFL reconstruction and TTT) to outcomes reported in the literature by patients who required either only an isolated TTT procedure to treat pathologic lateral patellar instability or isolated MPFL reconstruction to treat patellar dislocation due to MPFL insufficiency. Twenty-three patients (74%) were available for follow-up and are included in our analysis. MPFL reconstruction combined with TTT has a high rate of success for patients presenting with patellar instability and extensor mechanism mal-alignment. The risk of recurrence with this technique was low (4.3%).

7.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 479(5): 870-884, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33835103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pain after rotator cuff repair is commonly managed with opioid medications; however, these medications are associated with serious adverse effects. Relaxation exercises represent a potential nonpharmacologic method of pain management that can be easily implemented without substantial adverse effects; however, the effects of relaxation exercises have not been studied in a practical, reproducible protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does performing relaxation exercises after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) decrease pain compared with standard pain management medication? (2) Does performing relaxation exercises after ARCR decrease opioid consumption? (3) What proportion of patients who used the relaxation techniques believed they decreased their pain level, and what proportion continued using these techniques at 2 weeks? (4) Does performing relaxation exercises after ARCR affect shoulder function? METHODS: During the study period, 563 patients were eligible for inclusion; however, only 146 were enrolled, randomized, and postoperatively followed (relaxation group: 74, control group: 72); 68% (384 of 563) of patients were not contacted due to patient and research staff availability. Thirty-three patients were unenrolled preoperatively or immediately postoperatively due to change in operative procedure (such as, only debridement) or patient request; no postoperative data were collected from these patients. Follow-up proportions were similar between the relaxation and control groups (relaxation: 80%, control: 81%; p = 0.90). The relaxation group received and reviewed educational materials consisting of a 5-minute video and an educational pamphlet explaining relaxation breathing techniques, while the control group did not receive relaxation education materials. Patients recorded their pain levels and opioid consumption during the 5 days after ARCR. Patients also completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score preoperatively and 2, 6, 13, 18, and 26 weeks postoperatively. Linear mixed models were created to analyze postoperative pain, opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and shoulder function outcomes. A per-protocol approach was used to correct for patients who were enrolled but subsequently underwent other procedures. RESULTS: There was no difference in pain scores between the relaxation and control groups during the first 5 days postoperatively. There was no difference in pain scores at 2 weeks postoperatively between the relaxation and control groups (3.3 ± 3 versus 3.5 ± 2, mean difference -0.22 [95% CI -1.06 to 0.62]; p = 0.60). There was no difference in opioid consumption during the first 5 days postoperatively between the relaxation and control groups. The use of relaxation exercises resulted in lower 2-week narcotics consumption in the relaxation group than in the control group (309 ± 241 MMEs versus 442 ± 307 MMEs, mean difference -133 [95% CI -225 to -42]; p < 0.01). Sixty-two percent (41 of 66) of patients in the relaxation group believed the relaxation exercises decreased their pain levels. Fifty-two percent (34 of 66) were still performing the exercises at 2 weeks postoperatively. During the 6-month follow-up period, there was no difference in shoulder function between the relaxation and control groups. CONCLUSION: The preoperative administration of quick, basic relaxation exercises allowed patients to use appreciably lower opioid analgesic doses over the first 2 weeks after ARCR, without any worsening of pain scores. We consider this result promising but preliminary; it is possible that a more intense mindfulness intervention-the one we studied here was disseminated using only a 5-minute video-would deliver reductions in pain and further reductions in opioid usage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/rehabilitation , Breathing Exercises , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Relaxation Therapy , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mindfulness , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Philadelphia , Relaxation Therapy/adverse effects , Rotator Cuff/diagnostic imaging , Rotator Cuff/physiopathology , Rotator Cuff Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Rotator Cuff Injuries/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 34(1): 62-69, 2021 Feb 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33625162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although stool softeners and laxatives are commonly prescribed for postoperative constipation, it is unclear if they are effective during the postoperative period. The data gained from this study will be beneficial for advanced practitioners when examining for postoperative constipation concerns. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of docusate sodium and senna glycoside in the prevention and treatment of constipation following rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: Patients (n = 107) were randomized to receive docusate sodium, senna glycoside, or nothing (control) in addition to a standardized postoperative protocol. Patients maintained a daily bowel-movement log for postoperative days 0-10. Constipation symptoms and quality of life were assessed preoperatively and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively using the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of patients experienced constipation. There was no difference in the prevalence of constipation in the docusate, senna, and control groups (71.4%, 66.7%, and 64.3%, respectively; p = .88). Neither PAC-SYM nor PAC-QOL scores significantly differed between the 3 groups at any time point during 6-week follow-up (p > .05). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The majority (67%) of patients experience postoperative constipation following RCR. Although docustate sodium and senna glycoside are common first-line agents for the treatment of constipation, they are ineffective during the postoperative period. Providers need to explore other treatment modalities for postoperative constipation pain.


Subject(s)
Dioctyl Sulfosuccinic Acid , Quality of Life , Constipation/drug therapy , Humans , Rotator Cuff , Sennosides , Treatment Outcome
10.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 478(3): 619-628, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31977430

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient expectations may affect their satisfaction and functional outcomes after treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. Although there is evidence that patient expectations of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are inflated, there is limited knowledge about the relationship between physician and patient expectations and patient outcomes after they completely recover from ACLR. Furthermore, it is unclear if specific patient factors influence these expectations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are patient and surgeon expectations of knee function 18 months after ACLR similar? (2) Are patients' and surgeons' expectations of outcomes similar to patients' actual 2-year outcomes? (3) Is there a relationship between preoperative or intraoperative parameters and expectations? (4) Is there a relationship between preoperative or intraoperative parameters and 2-year ACLR outcomes? METHODS: One-hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing primary ACLR were prospectively enrolled in this study, with 98 (76%) completing 2-year follow-up. Patients completed the IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients also completed the same questionnaires preoperatively to evaluate expected knee function 18 months after surgery. Immediately postoperatively, surgeons completed the same questionnaires regarding the expected postoperative outcome at 18 months postoperative. Preoperative and intraoperative data were collected to determine an association between expectations and outcomes. Nonparametric analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the paired Wilcoxon signed ranks tests and Spearman's correlations, as applicable. RESULTS: There was no difference between patient and surgeon expectations (patient, 94.8 [range 47.4-100] versus surgeon, 94.3 [range 46-100]; p = 0.283), and there was no correlation between higher patient expectations and higher surgeon expectations (r = 0.168, p = 0.078). Patient and surgeon expectations were greater than the actual postoperative outcomes (2-year postoperative: 89.7 [range 32.2 to 100]; p < 0.0001); however, the differences are unlikely to be perceived. There was no correlation between higher 2-year postoperative outcomes and higher patient expectations (r = 0.14, p = 0.186) or higher surgeon expectations (r = 0.019, p = 0.86). Arthroscopic evidence of cartilage damage was independently associated with the worst patient and surgeon expectations. The surgeons themselves were also independently associated with surgeon expectation (p < 0.001). No parameters were associated with postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There are no clinically significant differences between surgeon expectations, patient expectations, and 2-year actual outcomes. However, there is also no correlation between the patient expectations, surgeon expectations, and actual outcomes. Although expectations are similar to actual outcomes for most patients, surgeons are unable to accurately predict outcomes for specific patients; thus, preventing adequate patient counseling. Surgeons should be cautious when evaluating and counseling patients preoperatively and avoid assuming high expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/psychology , Motivation , Patient Satisfaction , Surgeons/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Orthopedics ; 43(2): 85-90, 2020 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31881088

ABSTRACT

Factors motivating patients to undergo rotator cuff repair (RCR) have not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient and surgeon decision-making factors for RCR, as well as the use of conservative treatment, and their relationship with shoulder function. A total of 144 adult patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR completed a 13-item questionnaire assessing the importance of surgical decision-making factors. Preoperative conservative treatments were also recorded. Surgeons also completed a similar 5-item questionnaire assessing surgeon decision-making factors preoperatively. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) functional outcome scores were collected preoperatively through 1 year postoperatively. The following factors received the greatest frequency of high-importance scores: limited shoulder function (80.6%), surgeon recommendation (79.2%), and daily chronic pain (76.4%). Among surgeons, patient activity (83.3%) and risk of tear progression (73.6%) received the greatest frequency of high-importance scores. Patients had worse preoperative ASES scores when they reported the following factors as highly important: limited shoulder function, daily chronic pain, concern for tear enlargement, inability to sleep, and failure of conservative management (P<.004). Female gender, corticosteroid injection, and opioid use were also associated with worse preoperative shoulder function (P<.01). Workers' compensation claims, preoperative physical therapy, and multiple corticosteroid injections were associated with worse postoperative ASES scores (P<.05). Limitations in shoulder function and surgeon recommendation were the most common factors influencing patients to undergo RCR. Multiple factors were associated with worse shoulder function. Surgeons should be cognizant of patient decision-making factors and their relationship with shoulder function. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(2): 85-90.].


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Arthroscopy , Chronic Pain/etiology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Rotator Cuff Injuries/physiopathology , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology
12.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 101(18): 1628-1635, 2019 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567799

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Depression is a potential risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of clinical depression symptoms before and after shoulder stabilization, as well as the relationship between depression and functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing arthroscopic primary glenohumeral stabilization for recurrent instability were eligible for enrollment. Participants completed the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) questionnaire preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients with a preoperative QIDS-SR score of ≥6 were assigned to the clinical depression group. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were enrolled and were prospectively followed during this study. Thirty-nine patients were stratified into the clinical depression group. Preoperatively, the clinical depression cohort had worse WOSI scores than the cohort without clinical depression (mean difference, 8.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5% to 16.1%]; p = 0.04). Both the clinical depression cohort and the cohort without clinical depression displayed an improvement in WOSI scores at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.01 for both cohorts). Both the clinical depression cohort and the cohort without clinical depression displayed an improvement in QIDS-SR scores at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.01 for both cohorts). At 1 year postoperatively, the clinical depression cohort continued to have worse WOSI scores than the cohort without clinical depression (mean difference, 12.2% [95% CI, 5.9% to 18.5%]; p < 0.01) and worse QIDS-SR scores; the median QIDS-SR score was 5.0 points (interquartile range [IQR], 2.0 to 8.0 points) for the clinical depression group and 0.0 points (IQR, 0.0 to 3.0 points) for the group without clinical depression (p < 0.01). The postoperative prevalence of clinical depression (24%) was lower than the preoperative prevalence (51%) (p < 0.01). Increasing patient age was associated with preoperative depression symptoms (odds ratio, 3.1; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Fifty-one percent of patients with shoulder instability reported depression symptoms before the surgical procedure. Surgical intervention improved shoulder function and depression symptoms over time; however, the clinical depression cohort had worse postoperative shoulder and depression outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Depression/etiology , Joint Instability/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Adult , Arthroscopy/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Joint Instability/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Preoperative Period , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Self Report , Treatment Outcome
13.
Arthroscopy ; 34(4): 1186-1191, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29361423

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the occurrence of distal mononeuropathy (DMN) in patients before and after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) as well as resolution of the symptoms. METHODS: One hundred one patients over the age of 18 undergoing arthroscopic RCR +/- concurrent procedures completed a questionnaire regarding the presence of a symptomatic DMN. Patients with history of diabetic neuropathy, cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, or Spurling sign were excluded. All patients underwent physical examination to determine the characteristics and location of symptoms. Postoperatively, patients underwent repeat examination at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 19% (19/101) of RCR patients described DMN symptoms (9 median nerve symptoms, 5 ulnar nerve symptoms, 4 nonspecific symptoms, one with both ulnar and median nerve symptoms). Ninety percent (17/19) patients with preoperative DMN symptoms described resolution within the final 12 weeks of follow-up. A portion of previously asymptomatic RCR patients (12/82) developed new DMN symptoms (6 nonspecific symptoms, 3 ulnar nerve symptoms, 2 median nerve symptoms, one radial sensory nerve symptoms) postoperatively, with 92% (11/12) having resolution by the final 12-week follow-up. At the final 12 weeks, 3 RCR patients had DMN symptoms with 2 of those 3 patients having their symptoms existing preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the hypothesis that DMN can be a preexisting finding in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR. Similarly, it is common for patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR to develop new DMN symptoms following their procedure. Regardless, there is good evidence to show that a large majority of both groups of patients will go on to have resolution of their symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective case series.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Mononeuropathies/etiology , Rotator Cuff Injuries/complications , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Remission, Spontaneous , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Am J Sports Med ; 45(7): 1670-1675, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28298063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is a major complaint of patients with rotator cuff disease that often leads them to seek treatment. The authors previously reported a prospective analysis of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and found that sleep disturbance significantly improved at 3 months after surgery. That improvement in sleep was maintained at 6 months. HYPOTHESIS: In the current study, the authors sought to gain medium-term data on this same population at greater than 2 years. The hypotheses were that improvement in sleep disturbance after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is maintained at 2-year follow-up and that the continued use of narcotic pain medication has a negative effect on sleep quality at 2-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The original cohort of patients was contacted at a minimum of 24 months after their surgery. Thirty-seven of the 56 patients (66%) involved in the original study were available. Patient outcomes were scored using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The newly obtained scores were compared with prior scores, which ranged from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The statistically significant improvement of the PSQI score demonstrated in our prior analysis at 6 months postoperatively was maintained, with a mean PSQI score of 5.5 for the 37 patients followed beyond 24 months. Of those patients, 41% still had a PSQI score >5, indicative of sleep disturbance. However, even those patients in our study with a PSQI score >5, indicative of sleep disturbance, had an improved mean score of 9.3 at greater than 24 months compared with those patients with a PSQI score >5 at 6 months, who had a mean PSQI score of 11.5 ( P = .13). Both the SST and VAS scores displayed continued improvement at greater than 24 months, with both displaying moderate strength correlation to the PSQI score (VAS: Spearman rho = 0.479, P < .001; SST: Spearman rho = -0.505, P < .001). Regression models again demonstrated the continued use of narcotic pain medication correlating with poor sleep as the difference in the mean PSQI score between users and nonusers increased as postoperative time increased. At greater than 24 months after surgery, patients using narcotics had a mean PSQI score that was 7.4 points higher than narcotic nonusers (standard error [SE] = 1.93; P = .00017). CONCLUSION: At greater than 24 months, 41% of patients still demonstrated sleep disturbance, with both SST and VAS scores showing improvement. The prolonged use of narcotic medication negatively affects sleep, with a greater effect seen over time.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Rotator Cuff Injuries/complications , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/therapy , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Treatment Outcome
15.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 45(7): E415-E420, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28005116

ABSTRACT

The incidence of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) continues to rise. Given the changing healthcare climate, it is becoming increasingly important to critically evaluate current practice and attempt to make modifications that decrease costs without compromising patient outcomes. We conducted a study of the costs associated with arthroscopic anchorless (transosseous [TO]) RCR and those associated with the more commonly performed anchor-based TO-equivalent (TOE) method to determine whether there are any cost savings with the TO-RCR method. Twenty-one consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic TO-RCR were prospectively enrolled in the study and matched on tear size and concomitant procedures with patients who underwent arthroscopic TOE-RCR. The groups' implant costs and operative times were obtained and compared. Outcome measures, including scores on the VAS (visual analog scale) for pain, the SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation), and the SST (Simple Shoulder Test), recorded at 3, 6, and >12 months after surgery, were compared between the TO and TOE groups. Mean implant cost was $946.91 less for the TO group than the TOE group-a significant difference. Mean operative time was not significantly different between the TO and TOE groups. There was significant improvement on all outcomes measures (VAS, SANE, SST) at >12 months, and this improvement was not significantly different between the groups. Arthroscopic TO-RCR provides significant cost savings over TOE-RCR with no significant difference in operative time or short-term outcomes.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/economics , Health Care Costs , Operative Time , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Adult , Aged , Arthroscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Shoulder/surgery , Treatment Outcome
16.
Orthopedics ; 39(5): e944-9, 2016 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27398784

ABSTRACT

It is standard practice in high school athletic programs for certified athletic trainers to evaluate and treat injured student athletes. In some cases, a trainer refers an athlete to a physician for definitive medical management. This study was conducted to determine the rate of agreement between athletic trainers and physicians regarding assessment of injuries in student athletes. All high school athletes who were injured between 2010 and 2012 at 5 regional high schools were included in a research database. All patients who were referred for physician evaluation and treatment were identified and included in this analysis. A total of 286 incidents met the inclusion criteria. A total of 263 (92%) of the athletic trainer assessments and physician diagnoses were in agreement. In the 23 cases of disagreement, fractures and sprains were the most common injuries. Kappa analysis showed the highest interrater agreement in injuries classified as dislocations and concussions and the lowest interrater agreement in meniscal/labral injuries and fractures. In the absence of a confirmed diagnosis, agreement among health care providers can be used to infer accuracy. According to this principle, as agreement between athletic trainers and physicians improves, there is a greater likelihood of arriving at the correct assessment and treatment plan. Athletic trainers are highly skilled professionals who are well trained in the evaluation of athletic injuries. The current study showed that additional training in identifying fractures may be beneficial to athletic trainers and the athletes they treat. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5):e944-e949.].


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Consensus , Orthopedics/standards , Physical Therapy Specialty/standards , Referral and Consultation , Adolescent , Athletes , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/epidemiology , Contusions/diagnosis , Contusions/epidemiology , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Observer Variation , Orthopedics/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapy Specialty/statistics & numerical data , Schools , Sports , Sports Medicine , Sprains and Strains/diagnosis , Sprains and Strains/epidemiology
17.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 44(11): 505-9, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26566550

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and other orthopedic societies require authors to disclose conflicts of interest (COIs). We conducted a study to evaluate how a hypothetical research team's reported COI would influence the perceived value of its data. Using a hypothetical prospective study, we asked orthopedic surgeons and nonoperative sports medicine specialists to rate the value of the data, given different study designs, statistical significance, and research institutions (academic vs private). The fictional research team disclosed the project was funded by a pharmaceutical company and all team members received consulting compensation. Eighty percent of 522 respondents thought COI disclosure is important in the interpretation of study results, 41% reported always using this information when interpreting data, and 24% reported that a case series with significant positive results at an academic center was likely trustworthy (this percentage decreased to 5% when the study was set in a community hospital). When no significant difference was found in results, 42% thought the study was trustworthy. When the study design yielded level I evidence (randomized controlled trial) at an academic center, 57% thought the study was trustworthy (when the study was set in a community hospital, this percentage decreased to 39%). When the results of the design showed no difference among groups, the majority of respondents (62%) thought the study was trustworthy. Although the majority of respondents thought disclosure is important, fewer than half reportedly used this information when interpreting study results. Randomized controlled trial status improved the perceived reliability of the data over a case series but was not as important as reporting "negative" results.


Subject(s)
Conflict of Interest , Disclosure/ethics , Sports Medicine/ethics , Humans , Judgment , Reproducibility of Results
18.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 3(8): 2325967115601021, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26535394

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complete triceps tendon ruptures are relatively rare in the general population but slightly more prevalent in professional football. One prior study found 11 complete ruptures over a 6-season period. HYPOTHESIS: Triceps ruptures occur more commonly in football linemen due to forced elbow flexion during an eccentric contraction and may occur more commonly with the increasing size and speed of professional players. Surgical repair allows full return to sports, but with a lengthy recovery time. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A search of the National Football League Injury Surveillance System (NFLISS) found a total of 37 triceps tendon ruptures requiring surgical repair from the years 2000 to 2009. Data were obtained for setting of injury, player position, activity causing injury, play type, time of game when injury occurred, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and number of days lost from football. RESULTS: There were 37 players requiring surgical repair for triceps tendon ruptures over the 10-season period. The average height, weight, and BMI of the players were 75 inches, 292 pounds, and 36.5 kg/m(2), respectively. The majority of players were linemen (86%): 16 defensive, 15 offensive, and 1 tight end. The injury took place while blocking or being blocked in 29 players (78%) and while tackling or being tackled in 5 players (14%). Players missed an average of 165 days (range, 49-318 days) from football as a result of their injury and surgery. CONCLUSION: Triceps tendon tears requiring surgical repair are more common in professional football players than in the general population and are occurring more commonly than previously reported. Surgical repair allows return to play. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study identifies the rate of triceps tendon tears requiring repair in the NFL according to position, identifying which players may be most at risk for this injury.

19.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 23(8): 492-500, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26116851

ABSTRACT

Upper extremity pain can result from many overlapping etiologies. These can be categorized into anatomic regions and specific organ systems. Anatomically, pain etiologies are classified into four major groups: neurologic, musculoskeletal, vascular, and other (eg, tumor, infection). Knowledge of the characteristic clinical presentation and physical examination findings of each group can help distinguish the source of the patient's complaints quickly so that an accurate clinical diagnosis can facilitate appropriate diagnostic measures and treatment. A focus on the neurologic causes of upper extremity pain (ie, cervical spine pathology, peripheral nerve compression, neuropathy) and musculoskeletal causes of shoulder and elbow pain (eg, adhesive capsulitis, calcific tendinitis, biceps tendinitis, synovitis) and the distinguishing characteristics (eg, periscapular pain, two-point discrimination, signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI) helps determine the appropriate diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Physical Examination , Upper Extremity , Arthralgia/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology
20.
Am J Sports Med ; 43(6): 1455-9, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25776185

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is a common complaint of patients with a rotator cuff tear. Inadequate and restless sleep, along with pain, is often a driving symptom for patients to proceed with rotator cuff repair. To date, no studies have examined sleep disturbance in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair, and there is no evidence that surgery improves sleep disturbance. HYPOTHESIS: Sleep disturbance is prevalent in patients with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear, and sleep disturbance improves after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 56 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for full-thickness tears were enrolled in a prospective study. Patients were surveyed preoperatively and postoperatively at intervals of 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Patient outcomes were scored using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), visual analog scale for pain (VAS), and single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE). Demographic and surgical factors were also collected for analysis. RESULTS: Preoperative PSQI scores indicative of sleep disturbance were reported in 89% of patients. After surgery, a statistically significant improvement in PSQI was achieved at 3 months (P = .0012; 91% follow-up) and continued through 6 months (P = .0179; 93% follow-up). Six months after surgery, only 38% of patients continued to have sleep disturbance. Multivariable linear regression of all surgical and demographic factors versus PSQI was performed and demonstrated that preoperative and prolonged postoperative narcotic use negatively affected sleep. CONCLUSION: Sleep disturbance is common in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. After surgery, sleep disturbance improves to levels comparable with those of the general public. Preoperative and prolonged postoperative use of narcotic pain medication negatively affects sleep.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Aged , Arthroplasty/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Musculoskeletal Pain/surgery , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Rupture/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...