Endogenous androgens, coronary atheroma and remodeling in women with suspected ischemic heart disease: A report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study.

Background: Women have smaller coronary size than men independent of body surface area. Female to male heart transplantation demonstrates coronary lumen enlargement. Purpose: To investigate relationships between endogenous androgens and coronary luminal size in women with suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods: We analyzed 69 women with available androgen levels. Results: Group mean age was 54 ± 10 years with 64 % post-menopausal. Lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and external elastic membrane (EEM) CSA positively correlated with free testosterone (FT) (r = 0.29, p = 0.049; r = 0.29, p = 0.01), respectively, and negatively correlated with SHBG (r = -0.26, p = 0.03; r = -0.29, p = 0.02), respectively. Atheroma CSA positively correlated with FT (r = 0.24. p = 0.05). These correlations became non-significant after adjusting for waist circumference. Conclusions: In women with suspected ischemic heart disease, endogenous androgens, coronary atheroma and luminal size are related, and may be moderated by waist circumference.

Angiogenic Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina: Results of the EXACT Phase 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: XC001 is a novel adenoviral-5 vector designed to express multiple isoforms of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and more safely and potently induce angiogenesis. The EXACT trial (Epicardial Delivery of XC001 Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina Coronary Treatment) assessed the safety and preliminary efficacy of XC001 in patients with no option refractory angina. METHODS: In this single-arm, multicenter, open-label trial, 32 patients with no option refractory angina received a single treatment of XC001 (1×1011 viral particles) via transepicardial delivery. RESULTS: There were no severe adverse events attributed to the study drug. Twenty expected severe adverse events in 13 patients were related to the surgical procedure. Total exercise duration increased from a mean±SD of 359.9±105.55 seconds at baseline to 448.2±168.45 (3 months), 449.2±175.9 (6 months), and 477.6±174.7 (12 months; +88.3 [95% CI, 37.1-139.5], +84.5 [95% CI, 34.1-134.9], and +115.5 [95% CI, 59.1-171.9]). Total myocardial perfusion deficit on positron emission tomography imaging decreased by 10.2% (95% CI, -3.1% to 23.5%), 14.3% (95% CI, 2.8%-25.7%), and 10.2% (95% CI, -0.8% to -21.2%). Angina frequency decreased from a mean±SD 12.2±12.5 episodes to 5.2±7.2 (3 months), 5.1±7.8 (6 months), and 2.7±4.8 (12 months), with an average decrease of 7.7 (95% CI, 4.1-11.3), 6.6 (95% CI, 3.5-9.7), and 8.8 (4.6-13.0) episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months. Angina class improved in 81% of participants at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: XC001 administered via transepicardial delivery is safe and generally well tolerated. Exploratory improvements in total exercise duration, ischemic burden, and subjective measures support a biologic effect sustained to 12 months, warranting further investigation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04125732.

Pericardial fat volume is related to endothelial-mediated coronary blood flow in women with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction. A report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) study.

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction is prevalent in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with an adverse prognosis. Elevated pericardial fat volume predicts adverse cardiac events, but mechanistic pathways of the association are not well understood. Methods: 118 women enrolled in the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction study with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction but no obstructive CAD underwent adenosine stress 1.5 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) imaging and invasive coronary reactivity testing. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPR) index was derived from perfusion images. Pericardial fat volume was measured by manually contouring the cardiac margins and adjacent adipose tissue on a single trans-axial HASTE slice at the level of the left main coronary artery origin and indexed to body surface-area. Simple standard deviation analysis obtained for continuous variables and frequency (percent) for categorical variables. The relationships between pericardial fat volume and coronary reactivity testing parameters were examined by correlation and multivariable regression analyses. Results: Women with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction had a mean age of 55 ± 10 years, body mass index (BMI) of 28 ± 7 kg/m2, 44 % had a history of smoking, 63 % hypertension, 8 % diabetes, and 20 % dyslipidemia. CMR imaging-derived pericardial fat volume and coronary blood flow response to intracoronary acetylcholine (Δ CBF) were negatively correlated (r = -0.32, p = 0.0013). After adjustment for age, number of risk factors, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and cold pressor diameter response, pericardial fat volume remained a significant predictor of Δ coronary blood flow (p = 0.04). There was no association with other coronary reactivity testing measures or CMRI derived MPR index. Conclusions: Among women with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction but no obstructive CAD, pericardial fat volume appears to be related in a hypothesized adverse direction to coronary microvascular endothelial function. These results support further work confirming and extending these results to investigate pericardial fat volume as mechanistic pathway and potential treatment target for coronary microvascular dysfunction-related adverse events.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.govNCT00832702.

Physiology and functional significance of the coronary microcirculation: An overview of its implications in health and disease.

Ischemic, Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and death worldwide.

Elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adverse outcomes in women with symptoms of ischemic heart disease.

Background: Emerging data in the general population and those with coronary artery disease demonstrate higher risk of adverse outcomes with high (>70 mg/dL) HDL-C levels. There are limited data on the risk of adverse outcomes in women with suspected ischemic heart disease. Objective: To investigate relationships between high (>70 mg/dL), average (50-70 mg/dL), and low (<50 mg/dL) HDL-C levels with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization), and all-cause mortality in women referred for coronary angiography for suspected myocardial ischemia. Methods: A total of 607 women enrolled in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) original cohort (NCT00000554) with available HDL-C values were included in this analysis. Associations between HDL-C level and outcomes were evaluated using both multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and spline regression analysis. Results: The mean age was 59 ± 12 years, 62 % had 3 or more cardiac risk factors, and 66 (10.9 %) had a high HDL-C. High and low HDL-C were both associated with higher MACE risk compared to average HDL-C after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics (HR 1.80, CI 1.03-3.14, p = 0.038; HR 1.63, CI 1.09-2.42, p = 0.016, respectively). Similarly, high, and low HDL-C were associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.64, CI 1.84-7.20, p < 0.001; HR 2.81, CI 1.67-4.71, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: High and low HDL-C levels are both independently associated with higher MACE and all-cause mortality in women with suspected ischemia undergoing coronary angiography.

Comparison of risk profiles of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial, using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial by qualification by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) or Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA). METHODS: The WARRIOR trial (NCT03417388) is an ongoing multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation of intensive medical therapy vs. usual care in women with suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA) identified by either CCTA or ICA on the outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). No obstructive coronary artery disease is defined as <50% luminal stenosis and normal coronary arteries is defined as no evidence of atherosclerosis including calcified and non-calcified plaque. Data presented was extracted on May 27, 2020. No clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: An initial sample cohort of 797 women was included. The majority were younger than 65 years, White participants (73.3%), 159 had diabetes (19.9%), and 676 had angina (84.8%) with the remainder having symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease. Over 50% of randomized participants had normal coronaries without luminal irregularities by ICA or CCTA. Participants randomized to ICA were more likely to have worse baseline clinical risk profiles with older age, higher burden of cardiac risk factors and poor quality of life with disabling angina. CONCLUSIONS: Among this initial sample of women with suspected INOCA randomized in the WARRIOR trial, there is a differential baseline cardiac risk of participants enrolled after CCTA or ICA. However, the majority had no evidence of atherosclerotic plaque or obstructive stenosis, after evaluation by ICA or CCTA. These results suggest that non-invasive evaluation with CCTA is likely to be associated with lower risk of MACE.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is an underdiagnosed pathologic process that is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. There are data to suggest that coronary microvascular dysfunction, in some cases, may be genetically determined. We present an updated review of single nucleotide polymorphisms in coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Dietary Composition, Angiographic Coronary Disease, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the WISE Study (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation).

BACKGROUND: Studies relating diet to angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) and subsequent major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in women are limited. Information on diet was collected in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE), a prospective cohort study of symptomatic women referred for coronary angiography to evaluate suspected ischemic heart disease. METHODS: A consecutive subgroup (n = 201 of 936) of enrolled women completed the modified Block food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Data on outcomes were collected and adjudicated after 8-year follow-up. A set of logistic regression models were fitted for non-obstructive versus obstructive coronary stenosis (<50% versus ≥50%). Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted for outcomes, with each dietary composition variable adjusted for the degree of coronary stenosis. RESULTS: At baseline, the subgroup cohort was 58 ± 12 years old with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 ± 7 kg/m2. An increased proportion of calories consumed from protein was associated with higher levels of baseline obstructive coronary stenosis. Those individuals who ate a higher amount of protein, carotene, and servings of vegetables and meat, however, were each associated with lower subsequent adverse outcomes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing coronary angiography for suspected CAD, a higher percentage of protein intake was associated with higher baseline stenosis severity; however, the amount of protein intake, vegetable, meat, and carotene intake, was conversely associated with subsequent lower adverse cardiovascular outcome risk.

Effectiveness and Safety of Enteric-Coated vs Uncoated Aspirin in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the ADAPTABLE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Clinicians recommend enteric-coated aspirin to decrease gastrointestinal bleeding in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease even though studies suggest platelet inhibition is decreased with enteric-coated vs uncoated aspirin formulations. Objective: To assess whether receipt of enteric-coated vs uncoated aspirin is associated with effectiveness or safety outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a post hoc secondary analysis of ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-term Effectiveness), a pragmatic study of 15 076 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease having data in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Patients were enrolled from April 19, 2016, through June 30, 2020, and randomly assigned to receive high (325 mg) vs low (81 mg) doses of daily aspirin. The present analysis assessed the effectiveness and safety of enteric-coated vs uncoated aspirin among those participants who reported aspirin formulation at baseline. Data were analyzed from November 11, 2019, to July 3, 2023. Intervention: ADAPTABLE participants were regrouped according to aspirin formulation self-reported at baseline, with a median (IQR) follow-up of 26.2 (19.8-35.4) months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary effectiveness end point was the cumulative incidence of the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause, and the primary safety end point was major bleeding events (hospitalization for a bleeding event with use of a blood product or intracranial hemorrhage). Cumulative incidence at median follow-up for primary effectiveness and primary safety end points was compared between participants taking enteric-coated or uncoated aspirin using unadjusted and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All analyses were conducted for the intention-to-treat population. Results: Baseline aspirin formulation used in ADAPTABLE was self-reported for 10 678 participants (median [IQR] age, 68.0 [61.3-73.7] years; 7285 men [68.2%]), of whom 7366 (69.0%) took enteric-coated aspirin and 3312 (31.0%) took uncoated aspirin. No significant difference in effectiveness (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.80-1.09; P = .40) or safety (AHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.49-1.37; P = .46) outcomes between the enteric-coated aspirin and uncoated aspirin cohorts was found. Within enteric-coated aspirin and uncoated aspirin, aspirin dose had no association with effectiveness (enteric-coated aspirin AHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.88-1.45 and uncoated aspirin AHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.18; interaction P = .41) or safety (enteric-coated aspirin AHR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.02-5.50 and uncoated aspirin AHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.49-1.64; interaction P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance: In this post hoc secondary analysis of the ADAPTABLE randomized clinical trial, enteric-coated aspirin was not associated with significantly higher risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death or with lower bleeding risk compared with uncoated aspirin, regardless of dose, although a reduction in bleeding with enteric-coated aspirin cannot be excluded. More research is needed to confirm whether enteric-coated aspirin formulations or newer formulations will improve outcomes in this population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697916.

Modifiable statin characteristics associated with potential statin-related prescribing cascades.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Clinicians may prescribe new medications (marker drug) to treat statin-related (index drug) adverse events, constituting a prescribing cascade. We aimed to identify modifiable statin characteristics (intensity and individual statin agents) associated with lower risk of prescribing cascades to inform clinical decisions in the presence of statin-related adverse events. DESIGN: A secondary analysis based on our previous work, a high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis screening for potential statin-related prescribing cascades. DATA SOURCE: MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Insurance claims databases between 2005 and 2019. PATIENTS: Adults who initiated a statin between 2007 and 2018, and who were continuously enrolled in the same healthcare plan for at least 720 days before and 360 days after statin initiation. INTERVENTION: Among the previously identified 57 potential prescribing cascades, 42 statin-marker class dyad with a sample size of ≥ 500 were assessed in this study. MEASUREMENTS: We measured patients' baseline characteristics within -360 days of statin initiation and reported by modifiable statin characteristics. We also performed logistic regression and reported the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of modifiable statin characteristics after adjusting for baseline characteristics. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 1,307,867 statin initiators who met the study criteria (21% elderly, 52% female). Compared with patients initiating low-intensity statins, those initiating moderate- or high-intensity statins had significantly greater odds to develop 29 (69%) prescribing cascades, including antidiabetic drugs such as dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (aOR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.35) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs (aOR 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16-1.47), and opioids (aOR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.23). Individual statin agent selection also had a differential effect on 34 (81%) of the prescribing cascades. For example, compared with simvastatin initiators, the probability of initiating osmotically acting laxatives was significantly higher for lovastatin initiators (aOR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.15) and significantly lower in atorvastatin initiators (aOR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.94). CONCLUSION: Compared with low-intensity statins, high-intensity statins are associated with increased risk in many potential prescribing cascades, while the choice of individual statin agents affects the risk of prescribing cascades bidirectionally.

Symptom Presentation among Women with Suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA).

Identifying ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women based on symptoms is challenging. Women are more likely to endorse non-cardiac symptoms. More than 50% of women with suspected ischemia have no obstructive coronary disease (and thus, INOCA) and impaired outcomes during follow-up. We aimed to identify symptoms having predictive capacity for INOCA in women with clinical evidence of coronary ischemia. We included 916 women from the original WISE cohort (NCT00000554) who had coronary angiography performed for suspected ischemia and completed a 65-item WISE symptom questionnaire. Sixty-two percent (n = 567) had suspected INOCA. Logistic regression models using a best subsets approach were examined to identify the best predictive model for INOCA based on Score χ2 and AICc. A 10-variable, best-fit model accurately predicted INOCA (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.68, 0.75). The model indicated that age ≤ 55 years, left side chest pain, chest discomfort, neck pain, and palpitations had independent, positive relationship (OR > 1) to INOCA (p < 0.001 to 0.008). An inverse relationship (OR < 1) was observed for impending doom, and pain in the jaw, left or bilateral arm, and right hand, interpreted as INOCA associated with the absence of these symptoms (p ≤ 0.001 to 0.023). Our best-fit model accurately predicted INOCA based on age and symptom presentation ~72% of the time. While the heterogeneity of symptom presentation limits the utility of this unvalidated 10-variable model, it has promise for consideration of symptom inclusion in future INOCA prediction risk modeling for women with evidence of symptomatic ischemia.

Longitudinal cardiac remodeling in collegiate American football players as assessed by echocardiography during their collegiate career.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the longitudinal effects of intense physical training on cardiac remodeling are limited, especially in American collegiate football players. HYPOTHESIS: College-level American football training will result in remodeling in a pattern consistent of a sport with moderate static and dynamic demands with increases in both wall and chamber sizes. METHODS: We studied 85 American collegiate football players who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) for asymptomatic or mild COVID-19-related illness and compared the changes in echo dimensions to their preparticipation screening TTE. Pre- and posttraining variables were compared using a paired t-test for normally distributed variables. RESULTS: Mean age was 19 years ± 1 and 61% of athletes were Black. Mean follow-up between TTEs was 21 ± 13 months. There was an increase in left atrial volume index (26.4 ± 5.5 to 32.8 ± 8.4 mL/m2 , p < .001), LV end diastolic diameter (5.13 ± 0.4 to 5.27 ± 0.4 cm, p = .003), basal RV diameter (3.28 ± 0.7 to 3.83 ± 0.5 cm, p = <.001), LV mass index (86.7 ± 15.3 to 90.1 ± 15.3, p = .015), and aortic root diameter (3.1 ± 0.4 to 3.2 ± 0.3 cm, p = .03) from pre- to posttraining, with a slightly greater magnitude in athletes with >2 years of training. Presence of left atrial enlargement (≥35 mL/m2 ) increased from 2.9% to 29% pre- to postparticipation in athletes with >2 years training. No significant changes in wall thickness, diastolic function, or right ventricular systolic function were observed. CONCLUSION: American football players college-level training was associated with increases in left and right ventricular chamber sizes, left atrial size, and aortic root diameter.

EXACT Trial: Results of the Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study.

BACKGROUND: New therapies are needed for patients with refractory angina. Encoberminogene rezmadenovec (XC001), a novel adenoviral-5 vector coding for all 3 major isoforms of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), demonstrated enhanced local angiogenesis in preclinical models; however, the maximal tolerated dose and safety of direct epicardial administration remain unknown. METHODS: In the phase 1 portion of this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study, patients with refractory angina received increasing doses of encoberminogene rezmadenovec (1×109, 1×1010, 4×1010, and 1×1011 viral particles) to evaluate its safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy. Patients had class II to IV angina on maximally tolerated medical therapy, demonstrable ischemia on stress testing, and were angina-limited on exercise treadmill testing. Patients underwent minithoracotomy with epicardial delivery of 15 0.1-mL injections of encoberminogene rezmadenovec. The primary outcome was safety via adverse event monitoring over 6 months. Efficacy assessments included difference from baseline to months 3, 6 (primary), and 12 in total exercise duration, myocardial perfusion deficit using positron emission tomography, angina class, angina frequency, and quality of life. RESULTS: From June 2, 2020 to June 25, 2021, 12 patients were enrolled into 4 dosing cohorts with 1×1011 viral particle as the highest planned dose. Seventeen serious adverse events were reported in 7 patients; none were related to study drug. Six serious adverse events in 4 patients were related to the thoracotomy, 3 non-serious adverse events were possibly related to study drug. The 2 lowest doses did not demonstrate improvements in total exercise duration, myocardial perfusion deficit, or angina frequency; however, there appeared to be improvements in all parameters with the 2 higher doses. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial delivery of encoberminogene rezmadenovec via minithoracotomy is feasible, and up to 1×1011 viral particle appears well tolerated. A dose response was observed across 4 dosing cohorts in total exercise duration, myocardial perfusion deficit, and angina class. The highest dose (1×1011 viral particle) was carried forward into phase 2. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04125732.

Sex-Specific Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering Pharmacotherapy for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: An Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether the relative effects of blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes differ by sex, particularly when BP is not substantially elevated, has been uncertain. METHODS: We conducted an individual participant-level data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological BP lowering. We pooled the data and categorized participants by sex, systolic BP categories in 10-mm Hg increments from <120 to ≥170 mm Hg, and age categories spanning from <55 to ≥85 years. We used fixed-effect one-stage individual participant-level data meta-analyses and applied Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by trial, to analyze the data. RESULTS: We included data from 51 randomized controlled trials involving 358 636 (42% women) participants. Over 4.2 years of median follow-up, a 5-mm Hg reduction in systolic BP decreased the risk of major cardiovascular events both in women and men (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.92 [0.89-0.95] for women and 0.90 [0.88-0.93] for men; P for interaction, 1). There was no evidence for heterogeneity of relative treatment effects by sex for the major cardiovascular disease, its components, or across the different baseline BP categories (all P for interaction, ≥0.57). The effects in women and men were consistent across age categories and the types of antihypertensive medications (all P for interaction, ≥0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of BP reduction were similar in women and men across all BP and age categories at randomization and with no evidence to suggest that drug classes had differing effects by sex. This study does not substantiate sex-based differences in BP-lowering treatment.

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) project.

Background: While autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) have been linked with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), the relationship between ARD and CMD in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive arteries (INOCA) are not well described. We hypothesized that among women with CMD, those with ARD history have greater angina, functional limitations, and myocardial perfusion compromise compared to those without ARD history. Methods: Women with INOCA and confirmed CMD by invasive coronary function testing were included from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) project (NCT00832702). Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) were collected at baseline. Chart review was performed to confirm self-reported ARD diagnosis. Results: Of the 207 women with CMD, 19 (9%) had a confirmed history of ARD. Compared to those without ARD, women with ARD were younger (p = 0.04). In addition, they had lower DASI-estimated metabolic equivalents (p = 0.03) and lower MPRI (p = 0.008) but similar SAQ scores. There was a trend towards increased nocturnal angina and stress-induced angina in those with ARD (p = 0.05 for both). Invasive coronary function variables were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Among women with CMD, women with a history of ARD had lower functional status and worse myocardial perfusion reserve compared to women without ARD. Angina-related health status and invasive coronary function were not significantly different between groups. Further studies are warranted to understand mechanisms contributing to CMD among women with ARDs with INOCA.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of 2 aspirin doses in secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A subgroup analysis of ADAPTABLE.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with established cardiovascular disease, the ADAPTABLE trial found no significant differences in cardiovascular events and bleeding rates between 81 mg and 325 mg of aspirin (ASA) daily. In this secondary analysis from the ADAPTABLE trial, we studied the effectiveness and safety of ASA dosing in patients with a history of chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: ADAPTABLE participants were stratified based on the presence or absence of CKD, defined using ICD-9/10-CM codes. Within the CKD group, we compared outcomes between patients taking ASA 81 mg and 325 mg. The primary effectiveness outcome was defined as a composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke and the primary safety outcome was hospitalization for major bleeding. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to report differences between the groups. RESULTS: After excluding 414 (2.7%) patients due to missing medical history, a total of 14,662 patients were included from the ADAPTABLE cohort, of whom 2,648 (18%) patients had CKD. Patients with CKD were older (median age 69.4 vs 67.1 years; P < .0001) and less likely to be white (71.5% vs 81.7%; P < .0001) when compared to those without CKD. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months, CKD was associated with an increased risk of both the primary effectiveness outcome (adjusted HR 1.79 [1.57, 2.05] P < .001 and the primary safety outcome (adjusted HR 4.64 (2.98, 7.21), P < .001 and P < .05, respectively) regardless of ASA dose. There was no significant difference in effectiveness (adjusted HR 1.01 95% CI 0.82, 1.23; P = .95) or safety (adjusted HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.52, 1.64; P = .79) between ASA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD were more likely than those without CKD to have adverse cardiovascular events or death and were also more likely to have major bleeding requiring hospitalization. However, there was no association between ASA dose and study outcomes among these patients with CKD.