ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Controversy persists over: 1) how best to restore low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) levels (vitamin D2 [D2] vs vitamin D3 [D3]); 2) how best to define vitamin D status (total [protein-bound + free] vs free 25D); and 3) how best to assess the bioactivity of free 25D. OBJECTIVE: To assess: 1) the effects of D2 vs D3 on serum total and free 25D; and 2) whether change in intact PTH (iPTH) is more strongly associated with change in total vs free 25D. DESIGN: Participants previously enrolled in a D2 vs D3 trial were matched for age, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. Participants received 50 000 IU of D2 or D3 twice weekly for 5 weeks, followed by a 5-week equilibration period. Biochemical assessment was performed at baseline and at 10 weeks. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight adults (19 D2 and 19 D3) ≥18 years of age with baseline 25D levels <30 ng/mL were recruited from an academic ambulatory osteoporosis clinic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum measures were total 25D, free 25D (directly measured), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, calcium, and iPTH. Urine measure was fasting calcium:creatinine ratio. RESULTS: Baseline total (22.2 ± 3.3 vs 23.3 ± 7.2 ng/mL; P = .5) and free (5.4 ± 0.8 vs 5.3 ± 1.7 pg/mL; P = .8) 25D levels were similar between D2 and D3 groups. Increases in total (+27.6 vs +12.2 ng/mL; P = .001) and free (+3.6 vs +6.2 pg/mL; P = .02) 25D levels were greater with D3 vs D2. Percentage change in iPTH was significantly associated with change in free (but not total) 25D, without and with adjustment for supplementation regimen, change in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and change in calcium. CONCLUSIONS: D3 increased total and free 25D levels to a greater extent than D2. Free 25D may be superior to total 25D as a marker of vitamin D bioactivity.
Subject(s)
Calcium/blood , Cholecalciferol/administration & dosage , Ergocalciferols/administration & dosage , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Homeostasis/drug effects , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Vitamin D/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intravenous Ig (IVIG) is used in renal transplantation for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The infusion of high-dose IVIG is generally well tolerated, but there are reports of hemolytic anemia induced by anti-blood group antibodies present in IVIG. Here, we report our experience with IVIG-induced hemolytic anemia (IH) in ESRD patients receiving IVIG for desensitization or treatment of AMR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: All patients receiving IVIG for desensitization or for treatment of AMR were monitored for evidence of acute anemia and hemolysis. Markers of hemolysis, including direct antiglobulin tests, were recorded. Five different IVIG products were tested for isohemagglutinin titers. RESULTS: There were 18 cases of IH in 16 patients. All identified cases received the IVIG product Gamunex, Gammagard liquid, or Privigen. All patients developing hemolysis were non-O blood types. Isohemagglutinin titers ranged from 1:2 to 1:64 in the various IVIG products, with higher titers noted in the liquid, nonlyophilized products. CONCLUSIONS: Acute IH is a significant complication of high-dose IVIG infusion. Identified risk factors include non-O blood type of the recipient and administration of liquid IVIG preparations with high titer anti-A/B IgG antibodies. We recommend monitoring hemoglobin 48 to 72 h after IVIG infusion. If the hemoglobin decreases, a hemolytic work-up is recommended. Hemolysis could be avoided in at risk patients by choosing a low titer product. However, other complications such as acute renal failure or thrombosis may be seen because the low titer products are usually hyperosmotic.
