ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the Drug-Related Problems (DRP) and their resolution after pharmacological review in institutionalised elderly patients under polypharmacy. DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective cohort study from January to October of 2022. LOCATION: Twelve nursing homes at the Community of Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: 295 patients aged 65 or older taking at least 5 chronic medications prescribed prior to the treatment review. INTERVENTIONS: Medication reviews carried out by the pharmacist and agreed upon in face-to-face meetings between the primary care doctor, the nursing home doctor and the pharmacist. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Detected DRP, types and resolution. A age, sex, and number of medications before and after the intervention. Pharmacological subgroups according to anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system (ATC) and active pharmaceutical ingredients involved in the detected DRPs. RESULTS: 1425 DRP were detected, with a mean of 4.85 (SD 3.33) DRPs/patient. The most frequent DRP was reconciliation error (32.52%), followed by pharmaceutical regimen and dosaje. Among the 1425 improvement proposals, 86.73% of them were accepted.Significant statistically differences were observed between the number of medications per patient prior to the pharmacotherapy review (12.29) and after it (10.20), obtaining an average difference of 2.09 (95%CI: 1.98-2.21; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: It is found that the intervention of multidisciplinary team in which the pharmacist performs a revision of the medication decreased the number of prescribed medications. Therefore, it reduces polymedication and its associated risks.
ABSTRACT
Antecedentes: el uso de los inhaladores es algo complejo, con este trabajo en pacientes con EPOC debido a su complejidad, lo que se pretende es que tras la intervención de un farmacéutico se garanti-ce el uso adecuado de dichos medicamentos con el fin de mejorar la calidad de vida.Métodos: se citaba a los pacientes para la realiza-ción de una espirometría por parte de la enfermera y por otro lado la farmacéutica en una consulta valoraba el uso de los inhaladores y realizaba los test de adherencia y calidad de vida. A los tres meses los pacientes acudían a la segunda visita y la farmacéutica repetía el mismo el proceso para detectar los posibles cambios tras la intervención.Resultados: en aquellos pacientes que acudieron a las dos visitas se observó que había cambios estadísticamente significativos entre las puntuacio-nes de adherencia en la primera visita respecto a la segunda. La media de puntuaciones es mayor en la segunda visita (49,09) respecto a la primera (46,45), diferencia significativa con una p<0,05. La calidad de vida era igual en ambas visitas y la media de errores en el uso de inhaladores en la segunda visi-ta (1,773) se reduce de forma significativa respecto a la media de errores en la primera visita (4,727).Conclusiones: la intervención de un farmacéutico en un equipo multidisciplinar para el seguimiento de pacientes EPOC ha resultado beneficiosa para dichos pacientes, sobre todo en cuanto al manejo de los inhaladores y la adherencia al tratamiento. (AU)
Background: the usage of inhalers is something complex. This work with COPD patients pretends that, after the pharmacist intervention, the correct usage of these drugs is guaranteed so as to im-prove the quality of life. Methods: the nurse set a date to do an spirometry to the patients. On the other hand, the pharmacist assessed the usage of the inhalers and carried out the adherence and quality of life tests. Three months after, the patients came back to the con-sultation and the pharmacist repeated the same procedure to detect any possible change after the intervention.Results: on those patients that attended both ap-pointments, it was seen that there were statistically significant changes between the adherence punc-tuation regarding both appointments. The average of punctuation is higher in the second appointment (49.09) in respect to the first one (46.45), this is a significant difference with a p<0.05. The quality of life was the same in both appointments and the errors average in the usage of inhalators in the second appointment decreased (1773) significantly in respect to the errors average in the first appoint-ment (4727).Conclusion: the intervention of a pharmacist in a multidisciplinary team to the following of COPD pa-tients is advantageous to these patients, mainly in relation to the usage of inhalers and the adherence to treatment. (AU)
