Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 106, 2018 01 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29382302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the benefit of first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) over chemotherapy has been demonstrated in several clinical trials, data from clinical practice is lacking and the optimal EGFR TKI to be used remains unclear. This study aims to assess the real-life diagnostic and clinical management and outcome of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying EGFR mutations in Spain. METHODS: All consecutive patients recently diagnosed with advanced or metastatic NSCLC from April 2010 to December 2011 in 18 Spanish hospitals and carrying EGFR mutations were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Between March and November 2013, a total of 187 patients were enrolled (98.3% Caucasian, 61.9% female, 54.9% never-smokers, 89.0% adenocarcinoma). Mutation testing was mainly performed on biopsy tumour tissue specimens (69.0%) using a qPCR-based test (90%) (47.0% Therascreen EGFR PCR Kit). Common sensitising mutations were detected in 79.8% of patients: 57.1% had exon 19 deletions and 22.6% exon 21 L858R point mutations. The vast majority of patients received first-line therapy (n = 168; 92.8%). EGFR TKIs were the most commonly used first-line treatment (81.5%), while chemotherapy was more frequently administered as a second- and third-line option (51.9% and 56.0%, respectively). Of 141 patients who experienced disease progression, 79 (56.0%) received second-line treatment. After disease progression on first-line TKIs (n = 112), 33.9% received chemotherapy, 8.9% chemotherapy and a TKI, and 9.8% continued TKI therapy. Most patients received first-line gefitinib (83.0%), while erlotinib was more frequently used in the second-line setting (83.0%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients harbouring common mutations were 11.1 months and 20.1 months respectively (exon 19 deletions: 12.4 and 21.4 months; L858R: 8.3 and 14.5 months), and 3.9 months and 11.1 months respectively for those with rare mutations. CONCLUSION: EGFR TKIs (gefitinib and erlotinib) are used as the preferred first-line treatment while chemotherapy is more frequently administered as a second- and third-line option in routine clinical practice in Spain. In addition, efficacy data obtained in the real-life setting seem to concur with data from EGFR TKI phase III pivotal studies in NSCLC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Erlotinib Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Erlotinib Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Female , Gefitinib , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Staging , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quinazolines/adverse effects , Spain/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Tumori ; 101(5): e145-6, 2015 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26045109

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Brain metastases occur in about 30% of patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma; seizures occur in approximately 20% of them. Antiepileptic drugs are commonly given for postoperative prophylaxis after brain or metastasis tumor surgery. The incidence of seizures following supratentorial craniotomy is estimated to be 15%-20%. Postoperative seizures are more common in the first month after cranial surgery. However, the use of antiepileptic drugs postoperatively has been investigated in randomized controlled trials. In case of seizures, the recommendations are continuing antiepileptic drugs after a 1- to 4-year seizure-free interval. This decision must weigh the risk of seizure recurrence against the possible benefits of the drug. Some antiepileptic drugs have been known to cause blood dyscrasias, including neutropenia, but this is a rare occurrence. METHODS: We report a case of neutropenia related to the use of levetiracetam at first exposure. After drug administration, neutropenia was detected. Additional tests were performed. RESULTS: By exclusion, it was decided to withdraw the drug, and the patient had a reversal of neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam-induced neutropenia is infrequent but possible. It is an exclusion diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Piracetam/analogs & derivatives , Seizures/prevention & control , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Levetiracetam , Male , Middle Aged , Piracetam/administration & dosage , Piracetam/adverse effects , Seizures/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...