Financial Analysis of Operating a Resident Aesthetic Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Recent changes to the plastic surgery residency training requirements along with a general call for expanded education in cosmetic surgery have encouraged many institutions to incorporate resident aesthetic clinics into their curricula. Although the safety and satisfaction rates of resident aesthetic clinics have been well-studied, their financial viability has not. This study reviews the financial viability of the resident aesthetic clinic at the authors' institution through a cost analysis. METHODS: Billing data were analyzed for all patient visits to the resident aesthetic clinic of the authors' institution during calendar year 2018. Data were extracted, including type and anatomical location of each procedure, charges collected, and supplies used. A financial analysis was performed based on fixed and variable costs and gross revenue. RESULTS: A total of 100 unique patients were seen in the clinic over a 1-year period, resulting in 53 operations. This included 15 face, four breast, and 34 body contouring procedures. In addition, 160 cosmetic injections were performed. The gross revenue was $69,955 and the net revenue was $36,600. CONCLUSIONS: The resident aesthetic clinic at the authors' institution proved to be financially viable. The authors encourage other institutions to more closely examine the financial state of their resident aesthetic clinics as well. Furthermore, the authors hope that this analysis demonstrates to other programs that, with certain practice models, cost should not be a barrier to initiating and maintaining this valuable training tool.

Nasal Alar Surface Area Differences After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Long-Term Effects of the Perialar Incision.

BACKGROUND: The Millard rotation-advancement cleft lip repair is the most commonly performed cleft lip repair. An extended perialar incision allows for further advancement of the lateral lip element and improved positioning of the alar base. There is a lack of data evaluating differences in nasal alar growth when the perialar incision is utilized. This study compares the long-term effects of a perialar incision on the alar surface area of unilateral cleft lip patients who underwent a Millard cleft lip repair. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with a diagnosis of unilateral cleft lip treated with a Millard primary lip repair were studied. A perialar incision was utilized in 16 patients while 21 patients underwent a standard Millard repair. 3dMD facial images were taken at least 10 years after the initial lip repair. Using the patient's non-cleft side as an internal control, the Alar Ratio (AR) was calculated, defined as the cleft alar surface area divided by the non-cleft alar surface area. RESULTS: The AR was significantly greater in the standard Millard repair group compared to the perialar incision group, 0.74 and 0.64 respectively (P = .02). The incomplete cleft population demonstrated a more profound difference between the treatment groups (0.82 and 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals an association between a perialar incision and decreased alar surface area. Long-term follow up results suggest a perialar scar restricts alar growth leading to significant asymmetry between the cleft and non-cleft sides. Therefore, surgical technique must be carefully considered prior to utilizing a perialar incision during unilateral cleft lip repair.

Shortwave infrared fluorescence in vivo imaging of nerves for minimizing the risk of intraoperative nerve injury.

Here, we present a novel nerve specific imaging agent for preventing intraoperative nerve injuries based on SWIR QD-based in vivo imaging, which not only provides real-time and long-time SWIR images to intraoperatively identify nerves but can also markedly minimize the risk of iatrogenic nerve injuries during surgeries.

Update in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Implant-based reconstruction (IBR) remains the most commonly utilized breast reconstruction option for post-mastectomy patients. IBR can be approached as either a one-stage reconstruction or a two-stage reconstruction. Facilitated by improvements in surgical technology and advanced techniques, one-stage reconstruction, also known as direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, involves the insertion of an implant at the time of mastectomy. The decision to pursue either a DTI or a two-stage reconstruction is based on several factors, including the patient's overall health, expected risk of postoperative complications, and associated costs to both the patient and hospital.

Principles and Applications of Fat Grafting in Plastic Surgery.

Autologous fat transplantation has become increasingly popular in recent years. Its biocompatable properties and availability made it a widely used treatment modality for soft tissue augmentation and volume replacement in both reconstructive and aesthetic plastic surgery. Multiple protocols and clinical applications have been described in the literature, with wide variations in the harvesting, processing, and injection techniques. In this review, the authors will discuss the basic principles and clinical applications of fat grafting in plastic and reconstructive surgery. The article will then conclude with a discussion of fat grafting limitations as well as potential future applications, giving the reader a well-rounded understanding of autologous fat transfer.

Platelet-Rich Plasma: Principles and Applications in Plastic Surgery.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autogenously harvested liquid platelet concentrate extracted from a patient's peripheral blood that contains higher than baseline concentrations of growth factors and cytokines. This innovative new technology has demonstrated great promise in the field of plastic surgery, and its use has been evaluated in several clinical settings including wound healing, hair restoration, and skin rejuvenation. The goal of this article is to explain the biology behind PRP and to review the basic principles involved in its preparation. This will be followed by a discussion of some clinical applications of PRP in both aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery.

Efficacy of a Novel Optimized Pulsed Light Source (MaxG) for the Treatment of Facial Vascular Lesions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Facial vascular malformations can cause a number of functional problems, including difficulties in breathing, eating, speech, and mobility. Psychological problems can also arise due to the possible unpleasant appearance of such lesions. Further, these lesions can lead to a number of complications, including pain, ulceration, infection, and significant bleeding. Many treatments have been proposed in the literature. Laser therapy (and its related treatments by non-coherent light sources) is now considered the gold standard in the treatment of the majority of vascular lesions. METHODS: Here, we present our experience with a novel optimized pulsed light source for the treatment of vascular anomalies. In this prospective study, we evaluate the clinical outcomes of 30 patients treated with this method. RESULTS: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment for facial vascular lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience and results, we believe this device could be considered as both an alternative monotherapy and a useful adjunctive to the already existing laser instruments.

Alteration of Skin Mechanical Properties in Patients Undergoing Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections of Forehead Rhytides.

BACKGROUND: Although application of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) for the treatment of forehead rhytides has become very popular, the effects of its intramuscular injections on the skin mechanical properties remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: We prospectively investigated the alterations in the mechanical properties of the skin of patients who received intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) for forehead rhytides and compared two injection doses. METHODS: Of the 42 enrolled patients, one randomly assigned half received intramuscular injections of two units (group I), and the other half received four units (group II) of BTX-A in each injection point. The baseline and post-treatment skin mechanical parameters, including gross elasticity (R2), net elasticity (R5), viscoelastic ratio (R6) and biological elasticity (R7), were measured using the Cutometer(®) and compared. RESULTS: Treatment with BTX-A resulted in significant overall alterations in the mechanical properties of skin at the injection sites of both treatment groups during the 16-week period, and no significant differences were observed between groups. Significant decreases in biological elasticity, net elasticity and viscoelasticity properties were observed at 2 weeks follow-up and began to recover at that time. All of the skin mechanical properties recovered to baseline levels by 16 weeks of follow-up in both dosage groups, which indicates that the higher dosage (4 units) did not delay relapse compared to the two-unit dosage. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that intramuscular injections of BTX-A significantly regulated the gross elasticity, net elasticity, functional elasticity and viscoelastic elasticity at the injection point over a radius of 1.5 cm at 2, 4 and 8 weeks follow-up. The alteration in the skin measurements had completely diminished by the 16-week follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Objective breast volume, shape and surface area assessment: a systematic review of breast measurement methods.

BACKGROUND: There are many methods of measuring the breast and their clinical applications are well described in the literature. However, there has been no attempt to compare these various methods to allow the user to have a broad overview of the subject. The authors have attempted to summarise all the available methods to measure the breast in this article to provide a useful reference for all. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed was performed, and the resulting articles were screened and reviewed. The data regarding the methods' mechanism, reliability, time and cost were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: A total of 74 articles dating from 1970 to 2013 were included in this study. All of the methods can be classified into those that measure (1) volume, (2) shape and (3) surface area. Each category consists of several methods that work through different mechanisms and they vary in their reliability and feasibility. Based on their mechanism, the volume measurement methods were further grouped into the natural shape methods, the stereological method, the geometrical methods and the mathematical modelling method. CONCLUSIONS: More objective breast evaluation can be achieved if all three dimensions (volume, shape and surface area) are considered. In the volume measurements, 3D modelling and the MRI are the most reliable tools. Linear measurement (geometry) and mathematical modelling are less accurate but are more economical. In the shape measurements, besides the traditional linear measurement, 3D methods that can deliver colour-coded maps and Swanson's 2D photographic measurement system are capable of depicting and tracking breast shape changes after surgery. Although the surface area metric has not been used extensively, it has potential in clinical and research applications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Augmentation mammoplasty/mastopexy: lessons learned from 107 aesthetic cases.

BACKGROUND: One-stage augmentation/mastopexy entails the challenge of augmenting breast volume with an implant while resecting excess skin. Although both augmenting and lifting the breast in a one-stage operation is gaining in popularity, its safety and its efficacy are still under debate and merit deeper evaluation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience over a 5-years period with patients who underwent augmentation mammoplasty/mastopexy with the specific objectives of documenting their outcomes and formulating algorithms for safe, simple, and effective operative strategies to manage such patients. Our surgical approach to augmentation/mastopexy breast ptosis was described step by step. Patient satisfaction with the results was also evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients underwent successful simultaneous augmentation/mastopexy surgery. Sixty-nine underwent primary breast surgery and 38 underwent secondary breast surgery. In 12 cases a periareolar mastopexy scar was used, while in 51 patients a vertical approach was preferred; in 11 and 33 patients a short "T" and an inverted "T" scar mastopexy was necessary, respectively. Few complications were observed, with a very low overall complication rate (14 %) and a reoperation rate of 12.1 % at 14.7 months. Patient satisfaction with the results of this procedure was extremely high. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous augmentation/mastopexy is an effective and versatile way to lift the NAC, tighten the breast skin, increase breast projection, and fill in the upper pole. Our technique of simultaneous breast mastopexy after augmentation through a lower periareolar approach showed excellent correction of pre-existing ptosis, making this method highly reliable because the intraoperative tailor-tacking was customized to the patient, implant size, and projection.

A simple method to inset and position polyurethane-covered breast implants.

BACKGROUND: Polyurethane-covered breast implants have been used increasingly for cosmetic and revision breast surgery. The incision for insertion should be of minimal length and the placement of these implants in the pocket can be more difficult than that of conventional implants because of the highly adherent textured surface of the polyurethane external layer that grasps the surrounding tissues. The use of a sterile plastic insertion sleeve that is open on both sides is suggested by the manufacturer to overcome the friction between the polyurethane implant and the skin and surrounding tissues. METHODS: A new method to facilitate polyurethane implant insertion and adjustment in all cases of primary breast augmentation and revision surgery is presented. After the implant, which is in the sleeve, is located in the pocket, the plastic sleeve is filled with saline and antibiotics so the solution lubricates the surface around the implant. The sleeve is then twisted so that the solution is squeezed inside the pocket while the sleeve itself is pulled back and removed. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2013, this method was used in 73 cases of primary augmentation and revision breast surgery without any complications. CONCLUSION: The method described here allows for easier removal of the plastic sleeve during polyurethane implant insertion without any complications or evidence of implant migration or rotation at follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .