ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of roots that were prosthetically restored with cast post and core with or without any remaining coronal structure and with different finish lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty bovine incisors were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, endodontically treated and randomly divided into six experimental groups (n = 10) containing teeth with or without any remaining coronal structure and with a beveled shoulder, a chanfered or a shoulder finish line design. The cast post and core were luted with dual-cured resin cement. The metal crowns were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. The specimens were subjected to a tangential compressive load (135° angle) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure, using a universal testing machine. The fracture strength data were analyzed using the ANOVA and LSMeans (least square means) tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The data indicated that the teeth with 2 mm of remaining coronal structure showed the highest fracture strength values when compared with the teeth without any remaining structure (p < 0.05). As to the different finish line designs, the highest fracture strength values were obtained for the beveled shoulder, followed by the chanfered and then by the shoulder designs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It may be concluded that, to increase fracture strength, a beveled shoulder and 2 mm of remaining coronal structure are the ideal conditions.
Subject(s)
Dental Restoration, Permanent , Post and Core Technique , Tooth Crown/pathology , Tooth Fractures/prevention & control , Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Cattle , Compressive Strength , Dental Casting Technique , Dental Stress Analysis , Dentin , Incisor , Least-Squares Analysis , Random Allocation , Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic/methods , Tooth Root/injuriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of the composite photoactivation mode on microtensile bond strength and Knoop microhardness. METHODS: Standard class I cavities (3 x 4 x 3mm) were restored with two adhesives systems, Single Bond (SB) and Clearfil SE Bond (CE), and the TPH composite. The photoactivation of the composite was carried out using three modes: Conventional (CO: 400 mW/cm(2) x 40s), Soft-Start (SS: 100 mW/cm(2) x 10s+600 mW/cm(2) x 30s) and Pulse-Delay (PD: 100 mW/cm(2) x 3s+3 min wait+600 mW/cm(2) x 37s). For the microtensile test, beams obtained from the buccal wall bond interface were tested under tension at 0.5mm/min crosshead speed until failure. For the microhardness test, the restorations were sectioned in the mesio-distal direction and indentations were made on the internal composite surface of each half at three different depths. Data of two tests were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and LSMeans (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: In the microtensile test, SS presented the highest values. PD presented intermediate values without differing significantly from the other modes. For adhesives, SB presented the highest values. In the microhardness test, PD presented the highest values, differing significantly from SS. CO presented intermediate values but without any statistical difference from the others. The SS-CE interaction presented the lowest values with statistical differences from all the others. SIGNIFICANCE: By the SS technique, the highest bond strength was obtained. However, this technique made it possible for the adhesive system to intervene with the hardness of the composite.
