Acessos endodônticos: o que todo endodontista deve saber / Endodontic accesses: what every endodontist should know

Introdução: Os acessos endodônticos minimamente invasivos (AEMI) surgiram com o intuito de, por meio da preservação de estrutura dentária, manter a resistência à fratura de dentes tratados endodonticamente. A partir do primeiro estudo, em 2010, vários trabalhos foram desenvolvidos buscando entender qual a influência dos AEMI na resistência à fratura de dentes tratados endodonticamente. No entanto, interferências coronárias causadas pelos AEMI poderiam prejudicar a realização dos procedimentos subsequentes à cavidade de acesso, como a localização, instrumentação, limpeza, descontaminação e obturação dos canais radiculares. Objetivo: Com base nessa premissa, a presente revisão teve como objetivo responder algumas perguntas para que o clínico entenda quais são as principais modalidades de AEMI, os impactos da sua abordagem no tratamento endodôntico e o verdadeiro papel do tratamento endodôntico na perda dos elementos dentários. Resultados: Considerando os dados disponíveis até o presente momento, faltam evidências robustas para apoiar a alegação de que os AEMIs preservem a resistência à fratura dos elementos tratados endodonticamente melhor do que nos dentes acessados de maneira tradicional. Além disso, cavidades de acesso minimamente invasivas podem interferir em outras etapas do tratamento endodôntico, podendo torná-lo imprevisível. Conclusão: Dessa forma, pode-se concluir que há uma falta de evidências que apoiem a utilização de cavidades de acesso minimamente invasivas na prática clínica de rotina e/ou no processo de formação de alunos de graduação e pós-graduação (AU).

Introduction: Minimally invasive access cavities emerged aiming to maintain the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth through the preservation of dental structure. Starting with the first study in 2010, several others were developed to evaluate the influence of minimally invasive access cavities in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. However, the coronal interference caused by those access cavities could impair the subsequent procedures of root canal treatment, such as the location, instrumentation, cleaning, disinfection and filling of the root canals. Objective: Based on this premise, the aim of the present review was to answer some questions so that the clinician knows the main modalities of minimally invasive access cavities, the impacts of this approach and the real role of endodontic treatment in the tooth loss. Results: Considering the available data, there is a lack of robust evidence in literature to support the claim that the minimally invasive access cavities preserve the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth better than the traditional one. In addition, these access cavities can interfere in other stages of endodontic treatment, making it unpredictable. Conclusion: Thus, it can be concluded that there is a lack of evidence to support the use of minimally invasive access cavities in routine clinical practice and/or in the process of training undergraduate and graduate students (AU).

Effect of Fiber Post Cementation Timing on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements in Epoxy Resin-Obturated Canals.

This study evaluated the influence of timing after endodontic treatment and type of resin cement used on the bond strength of fiber posts to epoxy resin-obturated canals. A total of 80 bovine incisor roots were divided into four groups (n = 20). Glass fiber posts were cemented at two different times, immediately or 7 days after endodontic treatment, using either a dual-curing resin cement (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE) or a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE). Following post cementation, the samples were cross-sectioned into slices containing root dentin, cement, and fiber post at the cervical, mid, and apical root thirds. The push-out test was performed on a universal testing machine. Three-way analysis of variance for randomized blocks showed no significant effect within the triple interaction (P = .394) or between the double interactions cement-timing (P = .395), cement-root thirds (P = .996), and timing-root thirds (P = .331). The main factor cement revealed a significant effect, showing that regardless of the timing and root third, RelyX ARC provided significantly higher bond strength values than U200. Regardless of root third and timing, the dual-curing resin cement showed higher bond strength to root dentin when the canals were filled with epoxy resin-based cement.

Microcirurgia endodôntica piezoelétrica: conceitos e aspectos clínicos / Piezoelectric endodontic microsurgery: concepts and clinical aspects

Apesar do alto índice de sucesso do tratamento endodôntico de dentes com periodontites apicais, o insucesso pode ocorrer. Estes insucessos podem ser tratados através do retratamento endodôntico convencional, exodontia ou em algumas situações clínicas, através da microcirurgia endodôntica. Com índices de sucesso acima de 90%, a microcirurgia endodôntica é uma alternativa terapêutica a ser considerada para a manutenção estética e funcional de dentes portadores de insucessos endodônticos.

Although the high success rate of endodontic treatments of teeth with apical periodontitís, failures can occur. These clinical cases can be treated by conventional endodontic retreatment, or extraction and in some clinical situations, through endodontic microsurgery. With a success rate above 90%, the endodontic microsurgery is a good therapy to be considered in order to maintain these teeth in function.

Articaine (4%) with epinephrine (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) in intraosseous injections in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars: anesthetic efficacy and cardiovascular effects.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cardiovascular effects and the anesthetic efficacy of intraosseous injections of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (EPI100) or 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (EPI200). STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 0.9 mL EPI100 and EPI200 solutions were administered for endodontic treatment of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in 60 patients. The anesthetic success and pain during anesthesia were evaluated by visual analog scale. The cardiovascular parameters evaluated were heart rate, diastolic/systolic blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and electrocardiogram changes. RESULTS: Both solutions provided high anesthetic efficacy (96.8% and 93.1% for EPI100 and EPI200, respectively; P > .05), and the cardiovascular parameters showed minimal incidences of significant differences throughout the clinical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The epinephrine concentration did not affect the efficacy of 4% articaine, and both solutions produced a high success level of pulpal anesthesia. Intraosseous delivery by slow speed of injection did not induce significant clinical changes in cardiovascular parameters.