Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg versus other long-acting reversible contraceptives for contraception in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Condoms and combined oral contraceptive pills are widely used in Spain with high failure rates. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods offer better efficacy and adherence and reduce unintended pregnancies (UP) compared with short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) versus other LARC for contraception in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model with annual cycles and an eight-year time horizon was developed from the Spanish national healthcare system (NHS) perspective, considering costs for contraceptive method acquisition, health care resources (HCR) and UP. Effectiveness was based on failure and discontinuation rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the model's robustness. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) resulted in lower costs and fewer UP versus LNG-IUS 13.5 mg (Jaydess®), Implant (Implanon®) and Copper IUD. LNG-IUS 52 mg (Levosert®) prevented the same UP events at a higher cost. LNG-IUS 19.5 mg (Kyleena®) was the most effective option, due to a lower discontinuation rate. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) is the least costly LARC, driven by lower acquisition costs and reduced HCR utilisation. Increasing LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) uptake in contraception could generate further cost savings for the Spanish NHS and reduce economic burden of UP.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena^®) is an effective and cost-saving long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method compared with other similar methods in Spain over an eight-year time horizon, and Kyleena^® was the most effective option.

Effects of SARS-COVID-19 lockdown on menstrual patterns: A transversal large sample survey.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the presence, importance, and characteristics of menstrual changes related to stressful circumstances during the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. STUDY DESIGN: An online survey was administered in Spain to menstruating women aged 15-55 who had not contracted COVID-19. It collected information on activities during the lockdown, sexual activity, perceptions of emotional status, any changes in menstrual characteristics, and impact on quality of life. The analysis of menstrual changes was limited to responders who did not use hormonal contraception. RESULTS: A total of 6449 women answered the survey, and 4989 surveys were valid for the final analysis. 92.3% of women had at least one menstruation period during the lockdown, while 7.7% had amenorrhea. Quality of life (QoL) associated with menstruation worsened in 19% of women, did not change in 71.7%, and improved in 1.6%. For 50.1% of the women, global QoL worsened during the lockdown; 41.3% remained about the same and 8.7% reported improvement. Sexual activity during the lockdown decreased in 49.8% of the respondents, remained unchanged in 40.7%, and increased in 9.5%. As far the menstrual changes are concerned, there were no statistically significant differences in amenorrhea incidence, regularity of the menstrual cycle, or the amount or duration of menstrual bleeding in non-hormonal contraceptive users when evaluated by the length and characteristics of isolation, the perception of exposure to COVID-19 and the economic or employment situation. Conversely, we found statistically significant differences according to the intensity of changes in emotional status due to lockdown stressors and changes in regularity, duration, and heaviness of menstruation. CONCLUSION: Changes in emotional status, but not the length and intensity of the isolation or exposure to the disease, significantly influenced menstrual disturbances during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Health-related quality of life and satisfaction associated with 3-year use of a levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device vs Nova T copper 380 mm2 intrauterine device: Results of a phase 4 randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the impact of levonorgestrel 13.5 mg and Nova T copper 380 mm2 intrauterine devices (LNG13.5-IUD and Cu380-IUD, respectively) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the satisfaction with the method throughout 3 years of use. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-center, evaluator-masked, randomized controlled trial to compare the bleeding profile of LNG13.5-IUD and Cu380-IUD users. Secondary objectives included HRQoL and satisfaction throughout the study. We used the validated questionnaire of the Spanish Society of Contraception (SEC-QoL), which evaluates social, sexual/psychological well-being, and menstrual/breast symptoms, to assess HRQoL and a 5-point Likert scale for satisfaction. RESULTS: These secondary outcomes were assessed in the whole population included in the study: 55 LNG13.5-IUD and 51 Cu380-IUD users. The mean overall SEC-QoL scores were similar at baseline (61.5 and 59.6, respectively; p = 0.570) and greater for LNG13.5-IUD after 3 years (69.2 vs 52.5, respectively; p = 0.002). All SEC-QoL domains scored also higher (p < 0.05 vs Cu380-IUD for all). At month 36, 20/30 (67%) and 8/28 (29%) users, respectively, had reached the MID (a 3.4-point increase) in SEC-QoL score (p = 0.004). At this time, 24/29 (82%) and 9/28 (32%) users, respectively, were "very satisfied" (p < 0.001). Willingness to continue the method was similar (22/28 [79%] vs 17/28 [61%] users, respectively; p = 0.170). CONCLUSIONS: Among the use of LNG13.5-IUD was associated with better HRQoL vs Cu380-IUD throughout the 3 years. Satisfaction with the method was higher with LNG13.5-IUD. IMPLICATIONS: People considering having an LNG13.5-IUD or a Cu380-IUD inserted may now benefit from the information regarding the impact of these devices on HRQoL and satisfaction with the method as reported in our study conducted in Spain.

Use of Contraceptive Methods Among Women in the General Population and Female Gynecologists in Spain: the ELEGIAN Survey.

Background: The contraceptive preferences of obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) are thought to influence the contraceptive counseling they provide. The purpose of this study was to assess contraceptive preferences of OB/GYNs and women in the general population (WGP) in the current Spanish contraceptive scenario. Materials and Methods: Anonymous online survey of 100 OB/GYNs and 1,217 WGP aged 23-49 years. Results: WGP were younger (35.3 ± 7.3 vs. 37.9 ± 6.2 years, respectively) and less likely to have stable partners (64.7% vs. 84.0%) and children (49.1% vs. 62.0%) (all p < 0.05 vs. OB/GYNs). Seventy-nine percent versus 82%, respectively, used contraceptive methods, with condoms used most frequently by WGP (37% vs. 22% by OB/GYNs; p < 0.05) and pills by OB/GYNs (26% vs. 21% by WGP; p > 0.05). Intrauterine devices (IUDs) were more frequently used by OB/GYNs (20% vs. 5%; p < 0.05), especially the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs) (18% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.05). The highest-rated methods were condoms among WGP and LNG-IUDs among OB/GYNs. Effectiveness was the most valued attribute of contraceptive methods for both. Reasons related to convenience were the main reason for choosing IUDs. OB/GYNs prescribed the contraceptive method in 40% of cases. Conclusions: Our study reveals differences between female OB/GYNs and WGP in contraceptive methods use and rating. The use of LNG-IUDs was much higher among OB/GYNs.

Bleeding profile and safety of a levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device versus Nova T copper 380 mm2 intrauterine device: Results of a 3-year, single-center, randomized phase 4 study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bleeding profiles of the levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device (LNG13.5-IUD) and Nova T copper 380 mm2 IUD (Cu380-IUD). STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, evaluator-masked, randomized study conducted in women aged 18-45 years starting these methods. Primary outcomes were number of bleeding days, self-reported bleeding intensity, Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score, and blood biochemical values at baseline, months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 per 90-day reference periods except for PBAC (months). Secondary objectives were presence/duration/intensity of dysmenorrhea and tolerability. RESULTS: We included 106 women aged 32.5 ± 6.7 years: 55 with LNG13.5-IUD and 51 with Cu380-IUD. Data for LNG13.5-IUD versus Cu380-IUD at baseline and month 36 (both respectively) were as follows: (1) median (25th; 75th percentile) number of bleeding days: 12 (9.0; 15.0) versus 12 (9.0; 15.0), p = 0.82, and 4 (0; 13.7) versus 15 (14.2; 20.0), p < 0.001; (2) mean bleeding intensity: 1.7 for both, p = 0.66, and 0.7 and 2.2, p < 0.001. Forty percent versus 0% presented with amenorrhea at month 36; (3) mean PBAC score (95% Confidence interval (CI): 50.7 (16.6; 84.7) versus 130.4 (95.7; 165.0) at month 1, and 7.9 (-26.7; 42.6) versus 126 (90.7; 161.2), p < 0.001; (4) median (25th; 75th percentile) ferritin levels (Ug/L) 33 (19; 53) versus 30 (19; 45), p = 0.70, and 59 (42; 84) versus 21 (8; 39). We did not observe changes or differences between groups in hemoglobin and hematocrit. The duration and intensity of dysmenorrhea were significantly lower with LNG13.5-IUD versus Cu380-IUD. Adverse events were those expected. CONCLUSIONS: LNG13.5-IUD is associated with a significant reduction in blood loss and dysmenorrhea compared with Cu380-IUD. IMPLICATIONS: Women eligible for a levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device (IUD) or a copper 380 mm2 IUD should be informed of the differences in bleeding profiles-one of the main causes for IUD discontinuation-so they can compare this information against their bleeding expectations.

Sensitivity to Change of the SAMANTA Questionnaire, a Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Diagnostic Tool, After 1 Year of Hormonal Treatment.

Background: The validated SAMANTA questionnaire allows identification of women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB); that is, with excessive menstrual bleeding that interferes with quality of life (QoL). We assessed its value for monitoring HMB treatment in clinical practice. Material and Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted between December 2018 and March 2021 in consecutively recruited women with HMB attending gynecologists' offices who started a hormonal treatment. Sociodemographic characteristics were recorded at enrollment. At baseline and month 12, we assessed the HMB (SAMANTA questionnaire), the global impression of menstrual bleeding severity in patients (PGI-S) and clinicians (CGI-S), and the QoL (SF36). At month 12, we assessed the global impression of menstrual bleeding change in patients (PGI-C) and clinicians (CGI-C). Changes in SAMANTA questionnaire score at month 12 were compared with the presence of amenorrhea and changes in blood loss, menstrual period duration, and PGI-S, PGI-C, CGI-S, and CGI-C. Results: The study included 371 women aged 41.2 ± 6.5 years, 87% of whom were using the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. The SAMANTA questionnaire score significantly decreased in 97.3% of women. The decrease was greater in women reporting a reduction in blood loss, shorter menstrual bleeding duration, or a strong improvement in menstrual bleeding severity (PGI-S and CGI-S) or amount (PGI-C and CGI-C) (p < 0.001 for all), but not amenorrhea. SF-36 domains improved significantly; changes being inversely associated with changes in the SAMANTA questionnaire score. Conclusions: The SAMANTA questionnaire seems a valuable tool for monitoring hormonal treatment for HMB. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03751800.

Real-world satisfaction and menstrual bleeding pattern with available LNG-IUD among Spanish young women.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction and menstrual bleeding pattern with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUD) in young women. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study with 1-year follow-up was conducted in Spain. Participants were women between 18 and 30 years old who freely choose any available LNG-IUD for contraception. Satisfaction with LNG-IUD was measured with a 5-point Likert scale. Type of LNG-IUD, menstrual bleeding pattern and satisfaction with it, easiness of insertion and pain during procedure were collected. RESULTS: A total of 555 women (37.3% parous, 62.7% nulliparous) (mean age 25.8 ± 3.5) completed the study. After 12 months, 92.4% of women were satisfied or very satisfied with the LNG-IUD, with no differences by parity status, type of IUD or baseline menstrual bleeding pattern. Satisfaction with the LNG-IUD correlated with satisfaction with menstrual bleeding pattern at 12 months. Up to 88.7% of women were satisfied or very satisfied with their menstrual bleeding pattern at 12 months in comparison to 41.5% at baseline (p < 0.001). Adverse events (AE)-related discontinuation rate was low (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with LNG-IUD is very high among young Spanish women, regardless of parity and menstrual bleeding pattern at baseline.

The global pandemic and changes in women's reproductive health: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 global pandemic has led to the death of millions around the world and impacted the overall health of many people. In this article we aim to compare reproductive health indicators in the first 6 months of 2020 to the prior year, as well as explore stress and quality of life during this time. METHODS: This retrospective observational study examined the menstrual cycles of 1159 women who were using a fertility tracking device to record their menstrual cycle and BBT data. We utilised a supplemental mobile application to administer a supplemental survey to collect data on stress and quality of life. Descriptive analyses were conducted with t-tests for two-group comparisons. RESULTS: Study participants from 15 countries contributed to a total of 13,194 cycles. 23.1% (268/1159) responded to the survey focussed on assessing psychosocial distress. 44.4% (119/268) of the study participants reported that they had noticed a change in their menstrual cycle, temperature curve, or menstruation in the past 12 months. Cycle analysis found the average cycle length and pre-ovulation phase length was longer in the first 6 months of 2019, while the average days of menstruation was slightly longer in 2020. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that menstrual cycle indicators changed only slightly in the first 6 months of 2020 but were still statistically significant. We were also able to understand that these study participants had some level of awareness of changes to their menstrual health.

Percepción de los ginecólogos sobre la situación actual de los dispositivos intrauterinos durante el consejo contraceptivo en España para distintos perfiles de usuaria / Perception of gynecologists on the current situation of intrauterine devices during contraceptive advice in Spain for different user profiles

Objetivo: comunicar las percepciones de ginecólogos españoles sobre el uso del dispositivo intrauterino en distintos perfiles de usuaria. Materiales y métodos: estudio transversal descriptivo. 94 ginecólogos de diferentes regiones de España cumplimentaron un cuestionario sobre la situación del dispositivo intrauterino durante el consejo contraceptivo. Las valoraciones fueron consensuadas en una reunión nacional. Resultados: un 73% de los ginecólogos se manifestaron de acuerdo en recomendar los dispositivos intrauterinos en mujeres nulíparas. Sin embargo, solo un 52% declaró prescribirlo en ese perfil con frecuencia. Asimismo, un 93% de los participantes mostró acuerdo para afirmar la existencia de ideas preconcebidas sobre el dispositivo intrauterino y un 79% para afirmar que una mayor accesibilidad aumentaría su recomendación. Conclusiones: se sugiere incluir los distintos tipos de dispositivos intrauterinos durante el consejo contraceptivo según el perfil de cada usuaria, independientemente de edad o paridad, y preferiblemente los hormonales en mujeres candidatas (AU)

Objective: To communicate the perceptions of Spanish gynecologists about the use of intrauterine devices in different user profiles. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study. 94 gynecologists answered a questionnaire related to the current situation of intrauterine devices in contraceptive counseling. Answers and considerations were validated in a national meeting. Results: 73% of gynecologists showed their agreement to recommend intrauterine devices to nulliparous women. However, only 52% declared to often prescribe these methods to these users. In addition, 93% of participants agreed to describe the existence of preconceived notions about intrauterine devices, and 79% agreed to declare that better accessibility would increase intrauterine devices prescription rates. Conclusions: Considering all intrauterine devices types during contraceptive counseling was advised, giving preference to hormone-based methods in the appropriate women. Acknowledging the different user profiles was also recommended, regardless of age and parity (AU)

Mode of vaginal delivery: a modifiable intrapartum risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury.

The aim of this study was to analyze the comparative risks of this anal sphincter injury in relation to the type of intervention in vaginal delivery. We performed an observational, retrospective study of all vaginal deliveries attended at a tertiary university hospital between January 2006 and December 2009. We analyzed the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury for each mode of vaginal delivery: spontaneous delivery, vacuum, Thierry spatulas, and forceps. We determined the proportional incidence between methods taking spontaneous delivery as the reference. Ninety-seven of 4526 (2.14%) women included in the study presented obstetric anal sphincter injury. Instrumental deliveries showed a significantly higher risk of anal sphincter injury (2.7 to 4.9%) than spontaneous deliveries (1.1%). The highest incidence was for Thierry spatulas (OR 4.804), followed by forceps (OR 4.089) and vacuum extraction (OR 2.509). The type of intervention in a vaginal delivery is a modifiable intrapartum risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Tearing can occur in any type of delivery but proportions vary significantly. All healthcare professionals attending childbirth should be aware of the risk for each type of intervention and consider these together with the obstetric factors in each case.