Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Public Health Pract (Oxf) ; 7: 100480, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38455970

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Previous research has shown the most common memory of physical education (PE) was embarrassment, and that childhood memories of PE relate to physical activity (PA) attitude, intention, and sedentary behavior in adulthood [13]. Recess memories may have a similar effect on adult attitudes towards PA, given that recess is a physically active part of the school day, yet is more autonomous and less supervised than PE. Recent literature has supported this, as Massey and colleagues (2021b) reported memories of recess enjoyment were associated with PA enjoyment in adulthood, whereas negative recess memories were associated with social isolation. In an effort to better understand recess memories, and how they may be related to adult behaviors, the purpose of this study was to examine qualitative descriptions of adults' worst recess memories as it related to physical and social health. Study design: Mixed methods design; inductive content analysis and analysis of covariance. Methods: As part of a larger project, 433 participants between the ages of 19 and 77 (M = 44.91; SD = 15.35) were asked to recall their worst recess memories and the grades in which those memories occurred. Participants identified as predominantly female (52%), White (72%), and college educated (46%). Data analysis was conducted via an inductive content analysis by three research team members. Results: The most common negative memories included isolating experiences, physical injuries, victimization, and contextual factors (e.g., weather). Through a series of analysis of covariance, self-reported isolation and self-efficacy of exercise were significantly related to participants with social isolation and physical injury memories respectively. Conclusions: This study adds to a growing line of research documenting the importance of recess as a developmentally impactful environment with implications for physical and emotional health.

2.
Front Public Health ; 9: 642932, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33981665

ABSTRACT

Background: Schools and outdoor public spaces play a substantial role in children's physical activity. Yet, the COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandates bound many children to their available home spaces for learning, movement, and development. The exact effect this mandate had on children's physical activity may vary among families. Objective: To understand, from the perspective of parents, how the COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandates affected children's physical activity, while also considering families' socioeconomic status. Design: Open-ended survey. Setting: Online. Method: Data were collected from 321 parents living in the United States of America. Parents answered an open-ended prompt to describe their children's physical activity during COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandates. Following data collection, inductive and deductive content analysis examined patterns in the data. Results: Analyses indicated that shelter-in-place mandates restricted children's opportunities for physical activity. However, if families had access to outdoor spaces or equipment, they could encourage and support more physical activity opportunities than those without. Families in the lower-income bracket had less access to outdoor space and subsequently those children had fewer opportunities to be physically active. Parents supported their children's physical activity through their involvement and encouragement. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of access to outdoor spaces and equipment for increasing children's physical activity. Findings can be used by educators and policymakers to equitably support families of lower socioeconomic status who reported less access to outdoor spaces.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Child , Exercise , Humans , Parents , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
3.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol ; 55(3): 476-91, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20228318

ABSTRACT

The Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory-3 is a brief, self-administered screening tool designed to measure the probability of having a substance dependence disorder. The present study assessed the validity of this instrument with an inmate population using a DSM-IV diagnosis of substance dependence as the criterion measure. The study also examined instrument validity by gender. Findings revealed differences in the prediction of dependence between male and female inmates. The advantages and shortcomings of the instrument are discussed in light of these findings, and suggestions for future research are advanced.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/psychology , Illicit Drugs , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Prisoners/legislation & jurisprudence , Prisoners/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adult , Alcoholism/rehabilitation , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation
4.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol ; 54(3): 378-94, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19398588

ABSTRACT

This study examines the effect of inmate and institutional characteristics on inmate victimization during incarceration. In addition, it examines whether factors related to inmate victimization varies by perpetrator type, specifically inmate versus staff victimizer. Self-reported data from 247 male and female inmates confined to eight correctional institutions are collected, including questions regarding their experiences of staff-on-inmate and inmate-on-inmate victimization. Results show that similar institutional-level variables predict both types of inmate victimization; however, there are some differences between outcomes based on inmate-level characteristics. The authors address possible explanations for the results and suggest several policy implications to reduce the incidence of prison violence.


Subject(s)
Crime Victims/legislation & jurisprudence , Crime Victims/psychology , Individuality , Prisoners/psychology , Prisons/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Aggression/psychology , Coercion , Crime Victims/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Female , Hierarchy, Social , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Professional Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Misconduct/psychology , Professional Misconduct/statistics & numerical data , Southeastern United States , Violence/legislation & jurisprudence , Violence/psychology , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...