Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 104-109, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31381998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Type 2 endoleaks (T2Es) are the main cause of reintervention after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The objective of this study is to quantify success rates of T2E treatment. METHODS: This study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database containing data on all consecutive patients treated for a T2E between 2003 and 2017 in a single center. Technical success was defined as absence of endoleak in the final angiographic control after treatment. Clinical success was defined as absence of sac growth over 5 mm in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography performed a year thereafter. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. RESULTS: A total of 528 elective EVARs were performed in the period. Thirty-six of these (6.8%) developed a T2E requiring reintervention, a median of 37.9 months after EVAR. Twenty-five percent of the treatments were performed more than 5 years after intervention. Twenty-eight of the 36 treatments were performed via transarterial embolization. For this technique, technical success was 71.4% and clinical success was 62.5%. A subsequent reintervention was required in 35.7% of patients. In this cohort, the rate of aneurysm rupture was 10.7% (n = 3/28), open surgical conversion was needed in 2 of 28 cases (7.1%), and rate of aneurysm-related death was 14.3% (n = 4/28) over follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients are at risk of adverse outcomes after T2E treatment. Strict imaging follow-up is still needed in this population.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endoleak/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Databases, Factual , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endoleak/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Humans , Retreatment , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 59: 311.e5-311.e9, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802585

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this report is to present a challenging case of a mycotic aneurysm of the innominate artery (IA) in a patient with a bovine aortic arch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 85-year-old woman presented with intermittent fever and positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus aureus. An echocardiogram and a positron emission tomography-computed tomography were performed, showing a hypermetabolic dilation of the IA compatible with a mycotic aneurysm with a type one bovine aortic arch. Conventional open arch repair and total endovascular repair with a custom-made aortic endograft were rejected given the elderly age and need for urgent repair. Treatment was achieved with a hybrid procedure, including a left carotid transposition and exclusion of the aneurysm with a modified Endurant II® iliac limb (two stents were cut off and it was resheathed in an inverted fashion) released through a prosthetic graft sutured onto the right axillary artery, followed by coil embolization of the sac. One year after the repair, the patient is well with complete exclusion of the aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: Under the need for urgent repair, "on-the-table" modification of standard endograft components can be an effective solution for aneurysm exclusion when off-the-shelf endovascular stent grafts do not meet the anatomical requirements.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Infected/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Brachiocephalic Trunk/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Staphylococcal Infections/surgery , Stents , Aged, 80 and over , Aneurysm, Infected/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, Infected/microbiology , Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Brachiocephalic Trunk/diagnostic imaging , Brachiocephalic Trunk/microbiology , Computed Tomography Angiography , Female , Humans , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Prosthesis Design , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 53(2): 132-138, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30466369

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:: Endograft infection is an infrequent but one of the most serious and challenging complications after endovascular aortic repair. The aim of this study was to assess the management of this complication in a tertiary center. CASE SERIES:: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database was performed including all patients who underwent elective endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) from 2003 to 2016 in a tertiary center. Seven cases of endograft infection were identified during the follow-up period from a total of 473 (1.48%) EVAR. Most frequent symptoms at presentation were fever (71.4%) and lumbar pain (57.1%). One case developed an early infection, while 6 cases were diagnosed as late infections. Mean time from endograft placement to symptom presentation was 28.3 months (2-91.5 months). Gram-positive cocci were the microorganisms most commonly isolated in blood cultures (66%). Two cases were managed with endograft removal and aortic reconstruction with a cryopreserved allograft, 2 cases with surgical drainage, and 2 cases exclusively with antibiotic therapy. In 1 case, the diagnosis was performed postoperatively based on intraoperative findings associated with positive graft cultures; and graft explantation was performed with "in situ" reconstruction using a Dacron graft. Perioperative mortality was 42.9%. One-year mortality was 57.1%. Mean follow-up was 21.5 months. CONCLUSION:: Endograft explantation is the gold standard of treatment; however, given the overall high morbi-mortality rates of this pathology, a tailored approach should always be offered depending on the patient's overall condition. Conservative management can be an acceptable option in those patients with short life expectancy and high surgical risk.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Conservative Treatment/methods , Device Removal , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Clinical Decision-Making , Computed Tomography Angiography , Conservative Treatment/adverse effects , Conservative Treatment/mortality , Databases, Factual , Device Removal/adverse effects , Device Removal/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Humans , Middle Aged , Positron-Emission Tomography , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/mortality , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Spain , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...