Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 80
Filter
1.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 13(e1): e115-e121, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30446489

ABSTRACT

Patients with a limited life expectancy use many medications, some of which may be questionable. OBJECTIVES : To identify possible solutions for difficulties concerning medication management and formulate recommendations to improve medication management at the end of life. METHODS : A two-round Delphi study with experts in the field of medication management and end-of-life care (based on ranking in the citation index in Web of Science and relevant publications). We developed a questionnaire with 58 possible solutions for problems regarding medication management at the end of life that were identified in previously performed studies. RESULTS : A total of 42 experts from 13 countries participated. Response rate in the first round was 93%, mean agreement between experts for all solutions was 87 % (range 62%-100%); additional suggestions were given by 51%. The response rate in the second round was 74%. Awareness, education and timely communication about medication management came forward as top priorities for guidelines. In addition, solutions considered crucial by many of the experts were development of a list of inappropriate medications at the end of life and incorporation of recommendations for end-of-life medication management in disease-specific guidelines. CONCLUSIONS : In this international Delphi study, experts reached a high level of consensus on recommendations to improve medication management in end-of-life care. These findings may contribute to the development of clinical practice guidelines for medication management in end-of-life care.


Subject(s)
Terminal Care , Humans , Delphi Technique , Consensus , Death
2.
J Oral Rehabil ; 46(1): 23-32, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30281826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of people with dementia and natural dentition is growing. As dementia progresses, the degree of self-care decreases and the risk of oral health problems and orofacial pain increases. OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the presence of orofacial pain and its potential causes in older people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or dementia. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, the presence of orofacial pain and its potential causes was studied in 348 participants with MCI or dementia with all levels of cognitive impairment in two outpatient memory clinics and ten nursing homes. RESULTS: Orofacial pain was reported by 25.7% of the 179 participants who were considered to present a reliable pain self-report (Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥14 points), while it could not be determined in people with more severe cognitive impairment. The oral health examination of the 348 participants indicated that potential painful conditions, such as coronal caries, root caries, tooth root remnants or ulcers were present in 50.3%. There was a significant correlation between the level of cognitive impairment and the number of teeth, r = 0.185, P = 0.003, teeth with coronal caries, r = -0.238, P < 0.001, and the number of tooth root remnants, r = -0.229, P = 0.004, after adjusting for age. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that orofacial pain and its potential causes were frequently present in participants with MCI or dementia. Therefore, a regular oral examination by (oral) healthcare providers in people with MCI or dementia remains imperative, even if no pain is reported.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/complications , Dementia/complications , Dental Care for Chronically Ill , Facial Pain/etiology , Geriatric Assessment , Oral Health , Tooth Diseases/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Care for Aged , Dental Caries , Eating , Facial Pain/diagnosis , Facial Pain/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Homes , Tooth Diseases/diagnosis , Tooth Diseases/physiopathology
3.
CNS Neurosci Ther ; 25(3): 367-374, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246327

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Conventional dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is known to achieve better pain-paresthesia overlap of difficult-to-reach areas like the feet compared to dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). As in painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) pain is mostly present in the feet, we hypothesized that DRGS is more effective in relieving pain in PDPN when compared to SCS. METHODS: Diabetes was induced in female Sprague-Dawley rats with an intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg of streptozotocin (STZ; n = 48). Rats with a significant decrease in mechanical paw withdrawal response to von Frey filaments 4 weeks after injection were implanted with DRGS electrodes (n = 18). Rats were assigned to DRGS (n = 11) or sham-DRGS (n = 7). Mechanical paw withdrawal thresholds (WT, measured in grams) in response to DRGS (50 Hz, 0.18 ± 0.05 mA) were assessed with von Frey testing. The results of the experiments on these animals were compared to the results of a previous study using exactly the same model on PDPN animals selected for SCS (n = 8) (40-50 Hz, 0.19 ± 0.01 mA) and sham-SCS (n = 3). RESULTS: In the SCS group, the log10 (10 000 × 50% WT) increased from 4910 to 5211 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.05) and 5264 at t = 30 minutes (P = 0.11). In the DRGS group, the log10 (10,000 × 50% WT) increased from 4376 to 4809 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.01) and 5042 at t = 30 minutes (P < 0.01). Both DRGS and SCS induced a similar and complete reversal of mechanical hypersensitivity. After cessation of stimulation (t = 60), the return of the log10 (10 000 × 50% WT) response was significantly faster with DRGS than that of SCS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that conventional DRGS is as effective as SCS in reduction of PDPN-associated mechanical hypersensitivity in STZ-induced diabetic rats. The wash-in effect of DRGS and SCS was similar, but DRGS showed a faster washout course. Long-term efficacy should be studied in future animal research.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/therapy , Diabetic Neuropathies/therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Pain Management , Animals , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/physiopathology , Diabetic Neuropathies/physiopathology , Disease Models, Animal , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Female , Ganglia, Spinal/physiopathology , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Management/methods , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Spinal Cord/physiopathology
4.
Neuromodulation ; 22(7): 799-804, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30238550

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Structural differences of implantable drug delivery systems (IDDSs) might have an impact on the efficiency of needle access to the reservoir fill port (RFP). The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of RFP needle access with an ultrasound (US)-guided vs. a blind refill technique in IDDSs with a Recessed RFP (Recessed-RFP-IDDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary outcome was the number of attempts needed to enter the RFP with a needle comparing the US-guided technique vs. the blind refill technique. The time to enter the RFP with the needle was a secondary outcome. We compared the amount of attempts between both techniques with the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Fourteen adult patients underwent a total of 75 refills of their Recessed-RFP-IDDS during a period of 24 months. The median number of attempts to enter the RFP did not differ significantly between the US-guided technique and the blind refill technique (2.0 (IQR: 1-5) vs. 1.5 (IQR: 1-5.0), p = 0.572). The median time to enter the RFP with the needle did not differ significantly between both techniques (35.0 sec (IQR: 26.0-58.0) vs. 41.0 sec (IQR: 25.5-46.8), p = 0.878). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that there is no difference in the RFP needle access efficiency between the US-guided and the blind refill technique in superficially located Recessed-RFP-IDDSs, if performed by experienced practitioners. However, the study did not address efficiency of the RFP needle access in IDDSs with aberrancy in pump location or refills performed by inexperienced staff.


Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Delivery Systems/standards , Female , Humans , Infusion Pumps, Implantable/standards , Injections, Spinal/instrumentation , Injections, Spinal/methods , Injections, Spinal/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional/standards
5.
J Oral Rehabil ; 45(12): 990-997, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30126006

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the oral function of older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included participants with MCI or dementia aged 60 years or older. Global cognitive functioning was evaluated with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the oral function was evaluated with subjective and objective assessments, including the perceived quality of chewing and swallowing, the function of the prostheses, the number of occluding pairs (OP), the degree of tooth wear and the active and passive maximum mouth opening. RESULTS: The quality of chewing and swallowing was perceived as good in, respectively, 86.0% and 90.9% of the participants. Full or partial prostheses were worn by 63.8% of the participants, and the retention was good in 58.4% of the upper and 50.0% of the lower prostheses. Participants with MCI had a median of 3.0 (Inter Quartile Range [IQR] 0.0-7.5) occluding pairs, while participants with dementia had a median of 0.0 (IQR 0.0-1.0) occluding pairs, U = 3838.50, P < 0.001. There was a weak positive correlation between the number of occluding pairs and the MMSE score, r = 0.267, also when adjusted for age, r = 0.230. The median tooth wear score was 2.0 (IQR 2.0-2.0) in participants with MCI or dementia. The active maximum mouth opening was 45.8 (SD 9.3) mm in participants with dementia, while it was 49.8 (SD 8.1) mm in those with MCI, t(253) = 2.67, P = 0.008. CONCLUSION: For most participants with MCI or dementia, the swallowing ability and chewing ability were perceived as good. In addition, more than half of the prostheses had good retention and occlusion. Participants with more severe cognitive impairment had fewer occluding pairs and a smaller active mouth opening. The degree of tooth wear was less than one-third of the clinical crown in most participants with MCI or dementia.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Deglutition/physiology , Geriatric Assessment , Mastication/physiology , Tooth Loss/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dementia , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests
6.
Gerodontology ; 2018 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29707824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the psychometric evaluation of the Orofacial Pain Scale for Non-Verbal Individuals (OPS-NVI) as a screening tool for orofacial pain in people with dementia. BACKGROUND: The OPS-NVI has recently been developed and needs psychometric evaluation for clinical use in people with dementia. The pain self-report is imperative as a reference standard and can be provided by people with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment. METHODS: The presence of orofacial pain during rest, drinking, chewing and oral hygiene care was observed in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia using the OPS-NVI. Participants who were considered to present a reliable self-report were asked about pain presence, and in all participants, the oral health was examined by a dentist for the presence of potential painful conditions. After item-reduction, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity were determined. RESULTS: The presence of orofacial pain in this population was low (0%-10%), resulting in an average Positive Agreement of 0%-100%, an average Negative Agreement of 77%-100%, a sensitivity of 0%-100% and a specificity of 66%-100% for the individual items of the OPS-NVI. At the same time, the presence of oral problems, such as ulcers, tooth root remnants and caries was high (64.5%). CONCLUSION: The orofacial pain presence in this MCI and dementia population was low, resulting in low scores for average Positive Agreement and sensitivity and high scores for average Negative Agreement and specificity. Therefore, the OPS-NVI in its current form cannot be recommended as a screening tool for orofacial pain in people with MCI and dementia. However, the inter-rater reliability and criterion validity of the individual items in this study provide more insight for the further adjustment of the OPS-NVI for diagnostic use. Notably, oral health problems were frequently present, although no pain was reported or observed, indicating that oral health problems cannot be used as a new reference standard for orofacial pain, and a regular oral examination by care providers and oral hygiene care professionals remains indispensable.

7.
J Palliat Med ; 21(8): 1166-1170, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients who are in the last phase of life use multiple medications that are continued until shortly before they ultimately die. Little is known about physicians' opinions and experiences regarding medication discontinuation at the end of patients' lives. OBJECTIVE: To explore physicians' opinions and experiences regarding medication discontinuation during the last phase of life, and to identify factors influencing the continuation of potentially inappropriate medications. DESIGN: Questionnaire study, including a vignette and several statements. SETTING/SUBJECTS: A random sample of general practitioners and clinical specialists working in three regions in the Netherlands that represent more than half of the Dutch population. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 321 physicians (response rate: 37%). The majority of them (73%) agreed with the statement that patients who are in the last phase of life use too many medications. When presented with a vignette of a patient with end-stage COPD with different limited life expectancies, preventive medications would be stopped right early before death. Medications to relieve symptoms would not be stopped or stopped right before death. For medications to treat (chronic) illnesses, there was a huge interphysician variability. All statements about possible reasons why medications are continued in the last phase of life, for example, patients feeling abandoned and lack of time, were agreed upon by a small minority of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Although physicians agree that patients use too many medications at the end of life, they quite regularly seem to give patients medications for chronic diseases, for which the benefit at the end of life may be debatable. More scientific evidence on whether or not these types of medication might be discontinued in the last phase of life is needed.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , General Practitioners/psychology , Inappropriate Prescribing/psychology , Medication Adherence/psychology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Terminal Care/psychology , Terminal Care/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Nat Rev Neurol ; 14(5): 272-284, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29545626

ABSTRACT

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a pain condition that usually affects a single limb, often following an injury. The underlying pathophysiology seems to be complex and probably varies between patients. Clinical diagnosis is based on internationally agreed-upon criteria, which consider the reported symptoms, presence of signs and exclusion of alternative causes. Research into CRPS biomarkers to support patient stratification and improve diagnostic certainty is an important scientific focus, and recent progress in this area provides an opportunity for an up-to-date topical review of measurable disease-predictive, diagnostic and prognostic parameters. Clinical and biochemical attributes of CRPS that may aid diagnosis and determination of appropriate treatment are delineated. Findings that predict the development of CRPS and support the diagnosis include trauma-related factors, neurocognitive peculiarities, psychological markers, and local and systemic changes that indicate activation of the immune system. Analysis of signatures of non-coding microRNAs that could predict the treatment response represents a new line of research. Results from the past 5 years of CRPS research indicate that a single marker for CRPS will probably never be found; however, a range of biomarkers might assist in clinical diagnosis and guide prognosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/diagnosis , RNA, Small Untranslated , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/immunology , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/metabolism , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/physiopathology , Humans
9.
J Palliat Med ; 21(2): 149-155, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28949793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of medication management in the last days of life is to optimize patient's comfort. Little is known about the medication use in the days before death and how this relates to the care setting. OBJECTIVE: To describe medication use in the last week of life for patients dying in hospital, hospice, and home settings in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review study. SETTING: A convenience sample of patient records from the three settings in three different regions in the Netherlands that cover more than half the country. MEASUREMENTS: Information about medication use in the last week of life of patients who ultimately died an expected death was registered, including type of medication, start and if applicable stop dates, administration routes, and doses. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine records were analyzed. Medications most frequently used in the last week of life were analgesics (n = 168, 94.1%) and psycholeptics (n = 150, 84.7%), in particular by hospice patients. The mean number of medications used per patient was nine during day 7 before death and six on the day of dying. On the day of death, 48 (26.8%) patients used a preventive medication. This percentage was highest for patients dying in the hospital or at home. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who die an expected death receive many medications in the last week of life, part of which are preventive medications. Medication management in patients' final days of life can be improved, especially in the hospital and home setting.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Hospice Care/statistics & numerical data , Hospice Care/standards , Pain/drug therapy , Patient Comfort/statistics & numerical data , Patient Comfort/standards , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Retrospective Studies
10.
Pain Pract ; 18(6): 798-804, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282848

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) and facet joint blocks can be performed under fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT) guidance. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare patient radiation dose for lumbar TFESIs and facet joint blocks under CT guidance vs. fluoroscopic guidance. METHODS: The primary outcome of this retrospective cohort study was the difference between the estimated effective dose (ED) of CT guidance and fluoroscopic guidance for TFESIs and facet joint blocks. Patients who had undergone these procedures with both CT and fluoroscopic guidance were eligible for this study. Dose-length product for CT-guided procedures and dose-area product for fluoroscopic-guided procedures were retrospectively collected and converted to ED. Within- or between-group comparisons were performed with appropriate nonparametric tests, using a P value of < 0.05 to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: The 42 patients included in this study underwent a total of 100 procedures. The median estimated ED differed significantly between CT-guided injections and fluoroscopic-guided injections (1.59 mSv (interquartile range [IQR] 0.78 to 3.09) vs. 0.19 mSv (IQR 0.11 to 0.30) (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that TFESIs and facet joint blocks performed with CT guidance are associated with more than 8 times higher patient radiation dose exposure compared to fluoroscopic guidance. There needs to be more vigilance with regards to CT guidance in interventional pain procedures.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Injections, Epidural/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Radiation Exposure , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Zygapophyseal Joint
11.
Neuromodulation ; 21(7): 641-647, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206310

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The localization of the reservoir fill port of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Devices (IDDS) can be difficult. The purpose of this study was to assess the ease of fill port access during the ultrasound-guided refill technique compared to the blind refill technique in IDDSs with a raised septum on the pump surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Written informed consent was obtained from 19 adult patients undergoing regular refills of their Raised Septum IDDSs (RS-IDDSs). The primary outcome of this single center prospective comparison study was the number of attempts to enter the reservoir fill port with the needle comparing the ultrasound-guided technique vs. the blind technique. The number of skin punctures per refill procedure and time to enter the reservoir fill port was secondary outcomes. For between group comparisons the Friedman test for repeated measures on ranks was used. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven refill procedures were assessed in 19 patients over a period of 24 months. The median number of attempts to enter the reservoir fill port with the needle differed significantly between the ultrasound-guided technique and the blind technique (4 [IQR: 1-6] vs. 1 [IQR: 1-3], p = 0.018), in favor of the blind technique. The median time to enter the reservoir fill port differed significantly between the ultrasound-guided technique and the blind technique (58 sec [IQR: 38-94] vs. 22 sec [IQR: 16-40], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that for a RS-IDDS the blind refill technique needs significantly less attempts to enter the reservoir fill port than the US-guided refill technique.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Injections, Spinal/instrumentation , Injections, Spinal/methods , Pain/diagnostic imaging , Pain/drug therapy , Ultrasonography , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Humans , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
12.
Pain Med ; 19(5): 920-927, 2018 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29016892

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the pain prevalence, pain intensity, and pain medication use in older patients with a diagnosed subtype of dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or subjective cognitive impairment (SCI). Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Outpatient memory clinics. Subjects: In total, 759 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia, mixed AD and vascular pathology (MD), frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy Bodies, MCI, or SCI. Methods: Self-reported presence and intensity of pain, prescribed medication, and related descriptive variables were given for each group. To compare groups on prevalence of pain, logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, gender, and mood. Differences in pain intensity were tested using a Kruskall-Wallis test, and differences in analgesic use with chi-square analyses. Results: Pain prevalence ranged from 34% in MD to 50% in SCI. AD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-0.93) and MD (OR = 0.45, CI = 0.20-0.98) patients were less likely to report pain than SCI patients. The self-reported pain intensity did not differ between groups. In total, 62.5% of patients did not use any analgesic medication despite being in pain, which did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Outpatient memory clinic patients with mild to moderate AD and MD are less likely to report pain than patients with SCI. No difference in self-reported pain intensity was present. The high percentage of patients with and without dementia who do not use analgesics when in pain raises the question of whether pain treatment is adequate in older patients.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Dementia, Vascular/physiopathology , Pain/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dementia, Vascular/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Pain/diagnosis
13.
Clin Oral Investig ; 22(1): 93-108, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29143189

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of older people with dementia and a natural dentition is growing. Recently, a systematic review concerning the oral health of older people with dementia with the focus on diseases of oral hard tissues was published. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive literature overview following a systematic approach of the level of oral hygiene and oral health status in older people with dementia with focus on oral soft tissues. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: dementia and oral health or stomatognathic disease. A critical appraisal of the included studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and Delphi list. RESULTS: The searches yielded 549 unique articles, of which 36 were included for critical appraisal and data extraction. The included studies suggest that older people with dementia had high scores for gingival bleeding, periodontitis, plaque, and assistance for oral care. In addition, candidiasis, stomatitis, and reduced salivary flow were frequently present in older people with dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The studies included in the current systematic review suggest that older people with dementia have high levels of plaque and many oral health problems related to oral soft tissues, such as gingival bleeding, periodontal pockets, stomatitis, mucosal lesions, and reduced salivary flow. SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE FOR STUDY: With the aging of the population, a higher prevalence of dementia and an increase in oral health problems can be expected. It is of interest to have an overview of the prevalence of oral problems in people with dementia. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Older people with dementia have multiple oral health problems related to oral soft tissues, such as gingival bleeding, periodontal pockets, mucosal lesions, and reduced salivary flow. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The oral health and hygiene of older people with dementia is not sufficient and could be improved with oral care education of formal and informal caregivers and regular professional dental care to people with dementia.


Subject(s)
Dementia/complications , Mouth Diseases/complications , Oral Health , Oral Hygiene , Aged , Humans
14.
Palliat Support Care ; 16(5): 580-589, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805170

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACTObjective:Our aim was to gain insight into the perspectives of patients, close relatives, nurses, and physicians on medication management for patients with a life expectancy of less than 3 months. METHOD: We conducted an empirical multicenter study with a qualitative approach, including in-depth interviews with patients, relatives, nurses, specialists, and general practitioners (GPs). We used the constant comparative method and ATLAS.ti (v. 7.1) software for our analysis. RESULTS: Saturation occurred after 18 patient cases (76 interviews). Some 5 themes covering 18 categories were identified: (1) priorities in end-of-life care, such as symptom management and maintaining hope; (2) appropriate medication use, with attention to unnecessary medication and deprescription barriers; (3) roles in decision making, including physicians in the lead, relatives' advocacy, and pharmacists as suppliers; (4) organization and communication (e.g., transparency of tasks and end-of-life conversations); and (5) prerequisites about professional competence, accessibility and quality of medical records, and financial awareness. Patients, relatives, nurses, specialists, and GPs varied in their opinions about these themes. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This study adds to our in-depth understanding of the complex practice of end-of-life medication management. It provides knowledge about the diversity of the perspectives of patients, close relatives, nurses, and physicians regarding beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills, behavior, work setting, the health system, and cultural factors related to the matter. Our results might help to draw an interdisciplinary end-of-life medication management guide aimed at stimulating a multidisciplinary and patient-centered pharmacotherapeutic care approach.


Subject(s)
Medication Systems/standards , Patient Preference/psychology , Perception , Terminal Care/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Patients/psychology , Polypharmacy , Qualitative Research , Terminal Care/methods
15.
Pain ; 158(8): 1430-1436, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28715350

ABSTRACT

Clinical diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a dichotomous (yes/no) categorization, a format necessary for clinical decision making. Such dichotomous diagnostic categories do not convey an individual's subtle gradations in the severity of the condition over time and have poor statistical power when used as an outcome measure in research. This prospective, international, multicenter study slightly modified and further evaluated the validity of the CRPS Severity Score (CSS), a continuous index of CRPS severity. Using a prospective design, medical evaluations were conducted in 156 patients with CRPS to compare changes over time in CSS scores between patients initiating a new treatment program and patients on stable treatment regimens. New vs stable categorizations were supported by greater changes in pain and function in the former. Results indicated that CSS values in the stable CRPS treatment group exhibited much less change over time relative to the new treatment group, with intraclass correlations nearly twice as large in the former. A calculated smallest real difference value revealed that a change in the CSS of ≥4.9 scale points would indicate real differences in CRPS symptomatology (with 95% confidence). Across groups, larger changes in CRPS features on the CSS over time were associated in the expected direction with greater changes in pain intensity, fatigue, social functioning, ability to engage in physical roles, and general well-being. The overall pattern of findings further supports the validity of the CSS as a measure of CRPS severity and suggests it may prove useful in clinical monitoring and outcomes research.


Subject(s)
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/diagnosis , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/physiopathology , Pain/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
16.
Neuromodulation ; 20(7): 733-739, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28393436

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: One complication associated with the refill procedure of intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) include a "pocket fill," which is the inadvertent injection of the drug into the subcutaneous space surrounding the pump. The purpose of our study was to assess the mean volume discrepancy between the injected and the effective drug volume inside the IDDS reservoir after refills that did not lead to signs of overdose and to record at which volume discrepancy symptoms of overdose were noticed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 221 refill procedures performed in 19 adult patients, drug volume inside the reservoir was assessed with a fill level sensor, and the volume discrepancy between injected and measured volume was recorded. Symptoms of overdose were monitored. For between group comparisons the Mann-Whitney U test was used, using a p-value of <0.05 to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: The median volume discrepancy in the 20 mL IDDSs was 0.40 mL (IQR: 0.18-0.61; 10th p: 0.0; 90th p: 0.74) whereas in the 40 mL IDDSs the median volume discrepancy was 1.3 mL (IQR: 1.06-1.74; 10th p: 0.81; 90th p: 2.2). Symptoms of overdose were observed after 6 out of the 221 refill procedures. Volumes at which the symptoms of overdose arose were between 1.15 and 4.5 mL in 20 mL IDDSs and between 2.08 and 4.88 mL in 40 mL IDDSs. CONCLUSIONS: A volume discrepancy of >1 mL in 20 mL IDDSs and of >2 mL in 40 mL IDDSs after refill should be regarded as potentially consequential with regard to risk of overdose possibly caused by a pocket fill. In case of potentially consequential volume discrepancies, hospitalization and monitoring is recommended to preclude late overdose symptoms outside the hospital.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Injections, Spinal/adverse effects , Medication Errors , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Drug Overdose/etiology , Humans
17.
Pain ; 158(6): 1083-1090, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28178071

ABSTRACT

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a persistent pain condition that remains incompletely understood and challenging to treat. Historically, a wide range of different outcome measures have been used to capture the multidimensional nature of CRPS. This has been a significant limiting factor in the advancement of our understanding of the mechanisms and management of CRPS. In 2013, an international consortium of patients, clinicians, researchers, and industry representatives was established, to develop and agree on a minimum core set of standardised outcome measures for use in future CRPS clinical research, including but not limited to clinical trials within adult populations. The development of a core measurement set was informed through workshops and supplementary work, using an iterative consensus process. "What is the clinical presentation and course of CRPS, and what factors influence it?" was agreed as the most pertinent research question that our standardised set of patient-reported outcome measures should be selected to answer. The domains encompassing the key concepts necessary to answer the research question were agreed as follows: pain, disease severity, participation and physical function, emotional and psychological function, self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and patient's global impression of change. The final core measurement set included the optimum generic or condition-specific patient-reported questionnaire outcome measures, which captured the essence of each domain, and 1 clinician-reported outcome measure to capture the degree of severity of CRPS. The next step is to test the feasibility and acceptability of collecting outcome measure data using the core measurement set in the CRPS population internationally.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/diagnosis , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Pain Measurement/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , Internationality , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Clin Oral Investig ; 21(1): 17-32, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27631597

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to provide a systematic overview including a quality assessment of studies about oral health and orofacial pain in older people with dementia, compared to older people without dementia. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: dementia and oral health or stomatognathic disease. The quality assessment of the included articles was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: The search yielded 527 articles, of which 37 were included for the quality assessment and quantitative overview. The median NOS score of the included studies was 5, and the mean was 4.9 (SD 2.2). The heterogeneity between the studies was considered too large to perform a meta-analysis. An equivalent prevalence of orofacial pain, number of teeth present, decayed missing filled teeth index, edentulousness percentage, and denture use was found for both groups. However, the presence of caries and retained roots was higher in older people with dementia than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: Older people with dementia have worse oral health, with more retained roots and coronal and root caries, when compared to older people without dementia. Little research focused on orofacial pain in older people with dementia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current state of oral health in older people with dementia could be improved with oral care education of caretakers and regular professional dental care.


Subject(s)
Dementia/complications , Dental Care for Aged , Dental Care for Chronically Ill , Facial Pain/epidemiology , Oral Health , Tooth Diseases/epidemiology , Aged , DMF Index , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Dentures , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Root Caries/epidemiology , Tooth Loss/epidemiology
20.
Pain ; 157(8): 1674-81, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27023422

ABSTRACT

Limited research suggests that there may be Warm complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and Cold CRPS subtypes, with inflammatory mechanisms contributing most strongly to the former. This study for the first time used an unbiased statistical pattern recognition technique to evaluate whether distinct Warm vs Cold CRPS subtypes can be discerned in the clinical population. An international, multisite study was conducted using standardized procedures to evaluate signs and symptoms in 152 patients with clinical CRPS at baseline, with 3-month follow-up evaluations in 112 of these patients. Two-step cluster analysis using automated cluster selection identified a 2-cluster solution as optimal. Results revealed a Warm CRPS patient cluster characterized by a warm, red, edematous, and sweaty extremity and a Cold CRPS patient cluster characterized by a cold, blue, and less edematous extremity. Median pain duration was significantly (P < 0.001) shorter in the Warm CRPS (4.7 months) than in the Cold CRPS subtype (20 months), with pain intensity comparable. A derived total inflammatory score was significantly (P < 0.001) elevated in the Warm CRPS group (compared with Cold CRPS) at baseline but diminished significantly (P < 0.001) over the follow-up period, whereas this score did not diminish in the Cold CRPS group (time × subtype interaction: P < 0.001). Results support the existence of a Warm CRPS subtype common in patients with acute (<6 months) CRPS and a relatively distinct Cold CRPS subtype most common in chronic CRPS. The pattern of clinical features suggests that inflammatory mechanisms contribute most prominently to the Warm CRPS subtype but that these mechanisms diminish substantially during the first year postinjury.


Subject(s)
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/diagnosis , Inflammation/physiopathology , Adult , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/physiopathology , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Phenotype , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...