The value of intravenous contrast medium in PSMA PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the added value of diagnostic abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ceCT) in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive patients (median age, 69 years; range, 45-86 years) with BCR underwent Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT with low-dose nonenhanced (ne) whole-body CT and diagnostic ceCT. Imaging results were retrospectively reviewed by two readers (R1, R2) for diagnostic certainty, local recurrence, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and bone metastasis. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Histopathology served as reference standard in 7, imaging and clinical follow-up in 65 and clinical follow-up alone in 10 patients. RESULTS: Certain local recurrence, LNM and bone metastasis diagnoses increased substantially from ceCT (R1: 5%/18%/32%; R2: 37%/50%/82%) to nePET/CT (R1: 78%/87%/93%; R2: 81%/87%/95%) for both readers, but the difference between nePET/CT and cePET/CT (R1: 77%/96%/92%; R2: 89%/94%/96%) was marginal. Interobserver agreement was minimal with ceCT (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.04-0.26), substantial with nePET/CT (0.60-0.86) and best with cePET/CT (0.76-0.86). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for local recurrence for R1/R2 were 0.60/0.65 for ceCT, 0.81/0.79 for nePET/CT and 0.81/0.82 for cePET/CT. AUCs for LNMs for R1/R2 were 0.67/0.77 for ceCT, 0.91/0.82 for nePET/CT and 0.92/0.87 for cePET/CT. AUCs for BMs for R1/R2 were 0.60/0.53 for ceCT, 0.93/0.84 for nePET/CT and 0.93/0.86 for cePET/CT. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic abdominal ceCT increases the diagnostic certainty and interobserver agreement in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT in BCR of prostate cancer. The diagnostic performance of cePET/CT is significantly better than ceCT alone but not nePET/CT.

Value of SPECT/CT in the assessment of necrotic bone fragments in patients with delayed bone healing or non-union after traumatic fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of single-photon emission computed tomography / computed tomography (SPECT/CT) compared with planar bone scintigraphy (BS) in the assessment of necrotic bone fragments in patients with delayed bone healing or non-union after traumatic fractures. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of patients with traumatic fractures and suspected delayed healing or non-union and/or persistent pain or suspected infection who had undergone planar late phase BS and SPECT/CT between 2011 and 2018. On the BS and SPECT/CT images, a necrotic fragment was considered if there was an area of absent radiotracer uptake (photopenia) related to bone at the fracture site. Histology served as a reference standard (presence or absence of necrotic bone fragments). If histology was not available, intraoperative findings and combined clinical and imaging follow-up served as reference standards. RESULTS: In 37 consecutive patients with traumatic fractures (femur (n = 18), tibia (11), humerus (6), radius (1), jaw (1)), necrotic bone fragments were suspected in 11 fractures (29.7%) on BS and in 16 fractures (43.2%) on SPECT/CT. 35 fractures (94.6%) had metallic implants. Histology showed necrotic fragments in 10/11 (90.9%) patients. For the detection of necrotic bone fragments, SPECT/CT showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 100%, 95%, 94%, 100%, and 97%, respectively, and BS 67%, 95%, 91%, 81%, and 83%, respectively. SPECT/CT significantly outperformed BS with better area under curve (AUC) for SPECT/CT (0.9773) compared to planar imaging (0.8106) (p-value < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SPECT/CT is an accurate tool in the assessment of necrotic bone fragments in patients with delayed bone healing or non-union after traumatic bone fractures and is superior to conventional planar BS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: SPECT/CT is accurate and superior to planar BS in identification of necrotic bone fragments, responsible for delayed bone healing/non-union after fractures.

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography arthrography of wrist, ankle, and knee joints.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the additional value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography arthrography compared with single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography alone in wrist, ankle, and knee joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 68 patients including 74 joints (48 wrists, 13 upper ankle (talocrural joint), and 13 knee joints) was performed. Activity in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images was graded using a four-point scale: 0 no uptake, one low uptake, two moderate uptake, and three high uptake. Arthrography images were evaluated for the presence of cartilage/ligament/meniscal lesions, and loose bodies. RESULTS: Fifty-six joints (76%) showed increased activity in late planar and 58 (78%) in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images, the latter graded as follows: grade 1 in 20 (34%), grade 2 in 29 (50%), grade 3 in nine (16%) joints. 16 joints were inactive (grade 0) in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. In 57 joints (77%), intraarticular contrast unmasked additional pathologies (37 cartilage lesions, 25 ligaments tears, 25 triangular fibrocartilage complex tears, six meniscal lesions, and four loose bodies). There was matching findings between single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography arthrography in 57 joints (77%) and mismatching findings in 17 joints (23%). Out of these 17 mismatched joints, eight were metabolically inactive but showed some lesion in computed tomography arthrography, whereas nine metabolically active joints did not show any abnormality in computed tomography arthrography. CONCLUSION: The addition of arthrography to single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography of wrist, ankle, and knee joints leads to supplementary visibility of lesions of cartilage, ligaments, triangular fibrocartilage complex, meniscus, or loose bodies in 77% of joints. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography arthrography can serve as promising alternative especially in patients with magnetic resonance imaging contraindications or metallic hardware.

SPECT/CT arthrography.

Single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT arthrography, the combination of CT arthrography and late phase bone SPECT/CT, has been developed in 2011 and so far used in knee, ankle and wrist joints. SPECT/CT offers functional information about increased bone turnover in combination with morphological details. Compared with SPECT/CT alone, additional intra-articular contrast enables the assessment of cartilage, menisci, ligaments and loose bodies. SPECT/CT arthrography is a promising alternative technique for the evaluation of internal derangement of joints in patients with MR contraindications and/or metallic implants. In this article, we review and report our 5-year experience with this technique illustrated with patient examples and give a perspective for future applications.

Imaging non-specific wrist pain: interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of SPECT/CT, MRI, CT, bone scan and plain radiographs.

PURPOSE: Chronic hand and wrist pain is a common clinical issue for orthopaedic surgeons and rheumatologists. The purpose of this study was 1. To analyze the interobserver agreement of SPECT/CT, MRI, CT, bone scan and plain radiographs in patients with non-specific pain of the hand and wrist, and 2. to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging methods in this selected patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients with non-specific pain of the hand or wrist were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had been imaged by plain radiographs, planar early-phase imaging (bone scan), late-phase imaging (SPECT/CT including bone scan and CT), and MRI. Two experienced and two inexperienced readers analyzed the images with a standardized read-out protocol. Reading criteria were lesion detection and localisation, type and etiology of the underlying pathology. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement were determined for all readers and imaging modalities. RESULTS: The most accurate modality for experienced readers was SPECT/CT (accuracy 77%), followed by MRI (56%). The best performing, though little accurate modality for inexperienced readers was also SPECT/CT (44%), followed by MRI and bone scan (38% each). The interobserver agreement of experienced readers was generally high in SPECT/CT concerning lesion detection (kappa 0.93, MRI 0.72), localisation (kappa 0.91, MRI 0.75) and etiology (kappa 0.85, MRI 0.74), while MRI yielded better results on typification of lesions (kappa 0.75, SPECT/CT 0.69). There was poor agreement between experienced and inexperienced readers in SPECT/CT and MRI. CONCLUSIONS: SPECT/CT proved to be the most helpful imaging modality in patients with non-specific wrist pain. The method was found reliable, providing high interobserver agreement, being outperformed by MRI only concerning the typification of lesions. We believe it is beneficial to integrate SPECT/CT into the diagnostic imaging algorithm of chronic wrist pain.