Adherence to drug treatments and adjuvant barrier repair therapies are key factors for clinical improvement in mild to moderate acne: the ACTUO observational prospective multicenter cohort trial in 643 patients.

BACKGROUND: In acne, several studies report a poor adherence to treatments. We evaluate, in a real-life setting conditions, the impact of compliance to physician's instructions, recommendations and adherence to the treatments on clinical outcome in patients with mild to moderate acne in an observational, non-interventional prospective study carried out in 72 Dermatologic Services in Spain (ACTUO Trial). METHODS: Six-hundred-forty-three subjects were enrolled and 566 patients (88 %) completed the 3 study visits. Study aimed to evaluate the impact of adherence (assessed with ECOB scale) on clinical outcome, as well as how the use of specific adjuvant treatments (facial cleansing, emollient, moisturizing and lenitive specific topical products) influences treatment's adherence and acne severity (0-5 points score). Recommendation of specific adjuvant skin barrier repair products was made in 85.2 %. RESULTS: Overall, clinical improvement was observed throughout follow-up visits with an increased proportion of patients who reported reductions of ≥50 % on the total number of lesions (2 months: 25.2 %; 3 months: 57.6 %) and reductions of severity scores (2.5, 2.0 and 1.3 at 1, 2 and 3 months after treatment, respectively). Adherence to treatment was associated with a significant reduction on severity grading, a lower number of lesions and a higher proportion of patients with ≥50 % improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Good adherence to medication plus adherence to adjuvants was significantly associated with a higher clinical improvement unlike those that despite adherence with medication had a low adherence to adjuvants. A good adherence to adjuvant treatment was associated with improved adherence and better treatment outcomes in mild to moderate acne patients. (ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN14257026).

An expert view on the treatment of acne with systemic antibiotics and/or oral isotretinoin in the light of the new European recommendations.

In 2003 the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products amended the summary product characteristics for oral isotretinoin to standardise information provided from the different countries of the European Community. The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products recommended that among others, exclusively severe forms of acne (such as nodular or conglobate acne or acne at risk of permanent scarring) resistant to "adequate courses" of standard therapy with systemic antibacterials and local therapy should benefit from oral isotretinoin. However, no indication was provided on what were considered adequate courses or the possibility given to use oral isotretinoin as first line treatment. The aims of the present report were: 1) to provide a specialist view on when it is appropriate to introduce oral isotretinoin as a second line therapy for acne, taking into consideration optimum dosage and duration of systemic antibiotics prior to the start of the oral isotretinoin, and 2) to support the use of oral isotretinoin as first line therapy in specific cases for acne in clinical practice. The recommendations are based on an exhaustive literature review as well as on the personal experience of the members of an European panel of acne specialists. The EEP agreed with the decision made by the CPMP that oral isotretinoin should be administered as 2nd line therapy in those cases of severe acne, which were resistant to or which did not respond successfully to an initial combination regimen with systemic antibiotics and topical treatments (topical retinoids +/- benzoyl peroxide). However, the members emphasized that a number of prognostic factors, as well as psychosocial morbidity should be taken into account when choosing the regimen and that these factors may influence the use of oral isotretinoin as first line therapy.