Ticagrelor and prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome: a single-arm crossover platelet reactivity study.

AIM: To compare the degree of platelet inhibition between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: Platelet function was assessed by impedance aggregometry after 30-90 days of therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor and over 15 days after switching to prasugrel. High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) was defined for ADP test results above the upper limit of normal. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included, 81.9% males and 33.3% people with diabetes, with a mean age of 60.8 ±â€Š8.1 years. Mean platelet reactivity was not significantly different between the two antiplatelet strategies, as the prevalence of HRPR (8.6 vs 12.3%, P = 0.50). Switching between the two antiplatelet agents was safe and well tolerated, and effectively reduced platelet reactivity in over 95% of the patients (only 3.8% of the study population displaying ineffective response to both drugs). CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor and prasugrel have a similar effect on platelet reactivity. Switching between the two drugs can be safely done.

Low hemoglobin predicts high-platelet reactivity and major cardiovascular ischemic events at long-term follow-up among ACS patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: Reduced levels of hemoglobin (Hb) represent an established marker of impaired outcomes and increased cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease, challenging the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, while anemia has emerged as an independent predictor of suboptimal platelet inhibition in patients receiving clopidogrel, no study has so far evaluated the impact of Hb levels on high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) with ticagrelor and their prognostic consequences, that were the aim of the present study. METHODS: Patients on DAPT with ASA + Ticagrelor (90 mg/twice a day) after percutaneous coronary revascularization for ACS were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation tests were performed by multiple electrode aggregometry. Suboptimal platelet inhibition (HRPR-high residual platelet reactivity was defined if above the lower limit of normality (417 AU*min). The primary study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome [MI], target vessel revascularization) at longest available follow-up. RESULTS: We included 397 patients that were divided according to tertiles values of Hb (< 12.7, 12-7-14.09, ≥14.1 g/dl). Patients with lower Hb were older and displayed a more severe cardiovascular risk profile. Mean levels of platelet reactivity were enhanced in patients with lower Hb after stimulation with TRAP peptide (TRAP test, p = .03) and ADP (p = .02). Elevated platelet reactivity (HRPR) on Ticagrelor was more frequent among patients with reduced Hb (16.4% vs. 12% vs. 5.4%, p = .005, adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.71[0.996;3.01], p = .056). At a mean follow-up of 820.9 ± 553.4 days, 21.4% of the patients experienced the primary composite endpoint, with a higher rate of events in patients with lower Hb (27.6% vs. 22.6% vs. 13.5%, p = .006, adjusted HR [95%CI] = 1.51[1.12; 2.03], p = .006), mainly driven by a higher rate of recurrent ACS. After correction for baseline differences lower Hb tertiles but not HRPR emerged as independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR [95%CI] = 0.98[0.50; 1.92], p = .95). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we demonstrated that among patients on DAPT with ASA and ticagrelor after PCI for ACS, lower Hb levels are independently associated with a higher rate of HRPR and an increased rate of major ischemic events, and especially for recurrent ACS, although with no impact on survival. Neutral prognostic effect of HRPR was observed across Hb tertiles.

Use of Metformin and Platelet Reactivity in Diabetic Patients Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced platelet reactivity represents one of the major determinants of cardiovascular risk among diabetic patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of metformin use on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: We included diabetic patients treated with DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days by Multiple-electrode aggregometry. In an additional cohort of diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, we assessed platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry, surface expression of P-selectin and plasma concentration of Thromboxane B2 (TxB2). RESULTS: We included 219 diabetic patients, 117 (53.4%) treated with metformin. Metformin was associated with younger age (p=0.03), male gender (p=0.02), lower rate of hypertension (p=0.04), active smoker (p=0.002), previous MI (p<0.001) renal failure (p<0.001), fibrinogen (p<0.001) and C-reactive protein (p=0.04), larger use of diuretics (p=0.04) calcium antagonists (p=0.05), better glycemic control (p<0.001) and higher haemoglobin (p=0.003). The prevalence of HAPR did not significantly differ according to hypoglycemic treatment (p=0.73; adjusted OR[95%CI]=5.63[0.42-76], p=0.19). Moreover, no impact of metformin was observed for HRPR (p=0.77; adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.15[0.55-2.4], p=0.71). Among an additional cohort of 42 diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, we confirmed no impact of metformin or insulin on aggregation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no apparent association in diabetic patients treated with DAPT, between the use of metformin and platelet reactivity or the rate of HPR.

Impact of the rs73598374 polymorphism of the adenosine deaminase gene on platelet reactivity and long-term outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: The positive interaction of ticagrelor with the metabolism of adenosine has been claimed for the large antithrombotic and antiischemic benefits of this antiplatelet agent in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Adenosine catabolism is regulated by the activity of the adenosine deaminase enzyme (ADA), for which several polymorphisms have been identified. Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore the impact of the rs73598374 polymorphism of ADA gene on platelet reactivity in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor. METHODS: We included consecutive patients receiving ASA and ticagrelor after an ACS and coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by impedance aggregometry at 30-90 days post-discharge. The genetic analysis was carried out by PCR and RFLP. Clinical endpoints were mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization at the maximum available follow-up. RESULTS: Our population is represented by 464 patients, of whom 33.4% were A-heterozygotes and 6 homozygotes. A-allele carriers showed a greater prevalence of renal failure (p = 0.02) and a lower rate of previous coronary artery bypass graft (p = 0.03) and statin treatment (p = 0.02). No differences in the mean values of platelet reactivity or HRPR on ticagrelor were found according to the ADA genotype (11.3%vs13.9%, p = 0.45; adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.17[0.64-2.14], p = 0.61). At follow up, patients carrying the A-allele showed a non-significantly lower incidence of ACS and repeated unplanned revascularization, although with no effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study the rs73598374 polymorphism of the ADA gene did not affect platelet reactivity or the long-term prognosis in patients with ACS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and ticagrelor.

Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Diabetic Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Increased comorbidities and a perceived high-bleeding risk often prevent the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in female patients. However, more aggressive antiplatelet treatment would certainly offer additional outcome benefits in coronary artery disease, especially among diabetic patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the gender differences in high-residual on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) among diabetic patients treated with DAPT. METHODS: Our population is represented by a consecutive cohort of diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel, ticagrelor or dose-adjusted prasugrel) for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI, undergoing platelet reactivity assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry and in diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, by light transmission aggregometry, surface expression of P-selectin and plasma concentration of Thromboxane B2. RESULTS: We included 472 patients, 113 (23.9%) women. Female gender was associated with more advanced age, and increased comorbidities. Mean platelet reactivity did not differ according to gender. The rate of HRPR was similar in women as compared to men (for ASA: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.59[0.27-1.33], p = 0.21, for ADP-antagonists: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.24[0.25-1.80], p = 0.27), however, the benefits of the new ADP-antagonists on platelet reactivity were lower in women than in men (p interaction = 0.01). No impact of gender on platelet reactivity was confirmed among 50 diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy gender does not affect platelet reactivity or high-on treatment platelet reactivity. However, the enhanced platelet inhibition provided by the new-ADP antagonists of new-ADP antagonists could be mitigated in women.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on immature platelet fraction and its association with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Higher prothrombotic status and alterations in platelet function and thrombopoiesis are associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). We assessed the impact of diabetes and glucose control on the immature platelet fraction (IPF) and their relationship with prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography were included. Significant CAD was defined as at least one vessel stenosis greater than 50%. IPF levels were measured at admission by routine blood cells count (A Sysmex XE-2100). RESULTS: We included 1781 patients, of whom 660 (37.1%) suffered from diabetes. Diabetes was associated with advanced age and a higher cardiovascular risk profile. No difference in the mean values of IPF were observed between patients with or without DM (3.6 ± 2.5 vs 3.5 ± 2.5, P = 0.39) and neither in the rate of patients with IPF above the median (2.9%) (51.6% vs 50.6%, P = 0.73). In patients with DM, the IPF levels did not relate with glucose control parameters (glycaemia: r = -0.024, P = 0.54, glycosylated haemoglobin: r = 0.11, P = 0.72). The prevalence of CAD was significantly lower in patients with DM and IPF greater than the median (80.5% vs 86.5%, P = 0.04, adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.57[0.36-0.91], P = 0.02), while not left main/three-vessel CAD (36.9% vs 38.2%, P = 0.75, adjusted OR [95%CI] = 0.91[0.64-1.28], P = 0.90). CONCLUSION: In the present study, neither DM nor glucose control are independent predictors of IPF above the median. In patients with DM, higher IPF levels were associated with a lower prevalence of CAD and with a similar extent of severe CAD and angiographic findings. Therefore, until new data become available, elevated IPF should not be systematically applied on a large scale as cardiovascular risk marker in patients with diabetes.

Homocysteine levels and platelet reactivity in coronary artery disease patients treated with ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recurrent atherothrombotic events have been reported in certain higher risk subsets of patients even with ticagrelor, a potent first-line antiplatelet agent for the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Hyperhomocysteinemia is a known determinant of platelet function abnormalities. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of homocysteine (Hcy) levels on platelet reactivity in patients receiving Ticagrelor. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization and on dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA + Ticagrelor (90mg/twice a day) were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation tests were performed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA). Suboptimal platelet inhibition HRPR-high residual platelet reactivity was defined if above the lower limit of normality (417 AU*min). We included 432 patients, divided according to Hcy tertiles. Higher Hcy levels were associated with age, renal failure, creatinine levels and use diuretics (p < 0.001). Patients with higher Hcy levels displayed a higher platelet reactivity at COL test (p = 0.002), and ADP test (p = 0.04), with a linear relationship between Hcy and platelet aggregation after stimulation with collagen (r = 0.202, p < 0.001), thrombin receptor peptide (r = 0.104, p = 0.05) and ADP (r = 0.145, p = 0.006). However, Hcy levels did not significantly affect the rate of HRPR with Ticagrelor (9.9% vs 13.7% vs 10.7%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = [0.616-1.51], p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ACS, despite the elevated platelet reactivity associated to hyperhomocysteinemia, DAPT with ticagrelor could overcome such phenomenon, achieving an adequate platelet inhibition in the majority of the patients.

Vitamin D levels and platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D represents an emerging cardiovascular risk factor, and especially among higher-risk subsets of patients, such as in those with diabetes mellitus. The anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic properties of vitamin D, in fact, could be even more beneficial among diabetics, where platelet hyperreactivity and suboptimal response to antiplatelet drugs has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, no study has so far evaluated the impact of vitamin D levels on platelet reactivity and high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) among diabetic patients receiving dial antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: Our population is represented by a consecutive cohort ofdiabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor or dose-adjusted prasugrel) for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI, undergoing platelet reactivity assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients). RESULTS: We included 440 patients, that were divided according to quartiles values of vitamin D (< 9.4; 9.4-15.59; 15.6-21.64; ≥ 21.65 ng/ml). Among them, 31 were excluded as chronically treated with vitamin D supplementation. Lower vitamin D quartiles were associated with more advanced age (p = 0.01), female gender (p = 0.04), renal failure (p = 0.005), history of previous MI (p = 0.01), CABG and use of diuretics (p = 0.003), severe coronary disease (p = 0.002), but lower ejection fraction (p = 0.001), treatment with statins (p = 0.04) and new ADP-antagonists (p = 0.002). Vitamin D levels related with higher HbA1c (p = 0.001), cholesterol (p = 0.02) and creatinine (p = 0.004) and lower hemoglobin (p = 0.004). The prevalence of HRPR with ASA was low and not related to vitamin D quartiles (3.4% vs 2.7% vs 1.8% vs 2.1%, p = 0.44; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.16[0.60-2.26], p = 0.67). The prevalence of HRPR for ADP antagonists was associated to hypovitaminosis D (40.2% vs 29.1% vs 29.4% vs 25.5%, p = 0.03; (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.76[1.04-2.98], p = 0.036for I vs II-IV quartile). The impact of vitamin D quartiles, was significant only in patients on new ADP antagonists (n = 225, of whom 81 on prasugrel 5 mg; p = 0.03; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 3.12[1.34-7.49], p = 0.009) but not with clopidogrel (p = 0.85, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.05[0.49-2.24], p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, severe vitamin D deficiency is associated with a higher ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and rate of HRPR, and especially for new ADP-antagonists over clopidogrel.

Impact of aging on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Advanced age and diabetes represent summative conditions in the determination of cardiovascular risk, and especially for the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), often requiring balancing between bleeding and thrombotic complications. However, few studies have so far evaluated the impact of age on platelet reactivity and suboptimal platelet inhibition (high-on treatment platelet reactivity-HRPR) on DAPT among diabetic patients, that was, therefore the aim of the present study. In diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor) platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients). Elderly patients were considered ≥ 75 years of age. We included 462 patients, among them 149 (32.2%) were ≥ 75 years. Elderly patients were more often females (p = 0.006), with lower body size (p = 0.04), acute coronary syndrome at presentation and renal failure (p < 0.001), non-smokers (p = 0.002), in therapy with insulin (p = 0.02) and diuretics (p < 0.001) and lower rate of betablockers (p = 0.02). Age directly related with C reactive protein (p = 0.01), creatinine levels and inversely with hemoglobin (p < 0.001) and triglycerides (p = 0.003). No association was found at linear regression analysis for platelet reactivity and age with different activating stimuli, but for ASPI test (r = 0.12; p = 0.03). No significant difference in HAPR was found in elderly patients (2.4 vs. 3.2%, p = 0.76, OR[95% CI] = 0.45[0.1-2.11], p = 0.31). HRPR for ADP antagonists was similarly not affected by age (30.1% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.28, adjusted OR[95% CI] = 0.78[0.47-1.29], p = 0.33). Comparable results were obtained when considering separately the DAPT strategies with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, or when adjusting our results according to propensity score values. Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, age does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of high-on treatment platelet reactivity. Similar results were obtained for ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Reliability of Lupus Anticoagulant and Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin Autoantibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Multicenter Study.

Background: Is it well-known that one of the major drawbacks of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) test is their sensitivity to anticoagulant therapy, due to the coagulation based principle. In this study we aimed to assess the reproducibility of LA testing and to evaluate the performance of solid assay phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. Methods: We included 60 patients that fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (I) diagnosis of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS); (II) patients with thrombosis and (a) inconstant previous LA positivity and/or (b) positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) at low-medium titers [defined as levels of anti-ß2Glycoprotein-I or anticardiolipin (IgG/IgM) 10-30 GPL/MPL] with no previous evidence of LA positivity. aPL testing was performed blindly in 4 centers undertaking periodic external quality assessment. Results: The 60 patients enrolled were distributed as follows: 43 (71.7%) with thrombotic APS, 7 (11.7%) with thrombosis and inconstant LA positivity and 10 (16.7%) with low-medium aPL titers. Categorical agreement for LA among the centers ranged from 0.41 to 0.60 (Cohen's kappa coefficient; moderate agreement). The correlation determined at the 4 sites for aPS/PT was strong, both quantitatively (Spearman rho 0.84) and when dichotomized (Cohen's kappa coefficients = 0.81 to 1.0). Discordant (as defined by lack of agreement in ≥3 laboratories) or inconclusive LA results were observed in 27/60 (45%) cases; when limiting the analysis to those receiving vitamin K antagonist (VKA), the level of discordant LA results was as high as 75%(15/20). Conversely, aPS/PT testing showed an overall agreement of 83% (up to 90% in patients receiving VKA), providing an overall increase in test reproducibility of +28% when compared to LA, becoming even more evident (+65%) when analyzing patients on VKA. In patients treated with VKA, we observed a good correlation for aPS/PT IgG testing (Cohen's kappa coefficients = 0.81-1; Spearman rho 0.86). Conclusion: Despite the progress in the standardization of aPL testing, we observed up to 45% of overall discrepant results for LA, even higher in patients on VKA. The introduction of aPS/PT testing might represent a further diagnostic tool, especially when LA testing is not available or the results are uncertain.

Impact of immature platelet fraction on platelet reactivity during prasugrel maintenance treatment.

Residual high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has emerged as a predictor of major ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), especially after an acute cardiovascular event. However, its determinants are still poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of the percentage of reticulated platelets on HTPR in patients on DAPT with ASA (100-160 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg). Platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction [IPF]) were assessed at 30-90 days after an acute coronary syndrome. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HTPR was defined as ADP test > 417 AU × min. Our population is represented by 180 ACS patients undergoing stent implantation, divided according to median values of IPF (< or ≥ 2.8%). Higher IPF values were associated to lower platelet count (p < 0.001) and a higher rate of active smokers (p = 0.02). No difference was observed in terms of mean platelet reactivity, with different activating stimuli. The prevalence of HTPR on prasugrel did not significantly differ in patients with IPF < or ≥ 2.8% (8%vs. 11.8%, p = 0.46; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.89 [0.66-5.4], p = 0.24). Our study showed that in patients treated with prasugrel after PCI for ACS, the immature platelet fraction influences neither platelet reactivity nor the rate of HTPR.

Prevalence and predictors of high-on treatment platelet reactivity during prasugrel treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: ADP-antagonists such as prasugrel have reduced but yet not overcome the phenomenon of high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR), that has been shown to increase the rate of major cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the exact prevalence and the principal determinants of suboptimal platelet inhibition in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with prasugrel have not been completely clarified and were therefore the aim of the present study. METHODS: We included patients (<75 years and >60kg) treated with DAPT (aspirin+prasugrel) after PCI, mainly for an ACS. Platelet function test evaluation was performed at 1-3 months from discharge. HRPR was assessed by multiplate impedance aggregometry and defined for results above upper limit of normal after ADP stimulation. RESULTS: We included 190 post-ACS patients. HRPR with prasugrel was observed in 19 patients (10%). The prevalence of HRPR was stable in different high-risk subgroups of patients (female gender, hypercholesterolemic, and chronic kidney disease) whereas it was increased in diabetic patients (p=0.045), with a significant interaction between diabetic status and HRPR (p=0.04). However, at multivariate analysis, an impaired metabolic status, with higher levels of glycosylated hemoglobin and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not diabetic status, emerged as independent predictors of HRPR with prasugrel [OR (95% CI)=2.1 (1.32-3.33), p=0.002 and OR (95% CI)=1.03 (1.01-1.05), p=0.003, respectively], with a stronger linear relationship between ADP-mediated platelet aggregation and glycosylated hemoglobin levels (r=0.24, p=0.002), than for LDL-cholesterol (r=0.13, p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In post-ACS patients treated with PCI and receiving DAPT with prasugrel, HRPR is observed in about 10% of patients. Impaired metabolic status, and especially elevated glycosylated hemoglobin, emerged as independent predictors of the suboptimal effectiveness of prasugrel.

Impact of pre-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy on periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with adjunctive tirofiban.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from pre-treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, (PCI), even in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. However, suboptimal platelet inhibition during (PCI) has been shown to enhance the risk of acute ischemic complications, such as stent thrombosis and periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI), thus raising the attention on the potential advantages of adjunctive glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors to obviate to the delayed onset of action of oral antiplatelet drugs. The aim of the present study was then to evaluate the impact of platelet reactivity and pre-procedural DAPT on PMI in patients undergoing PCI with adjunctive tirofiban. METHODS: In a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing PCI with tirofiban (intracoronary/intravenous ±â€¯prolonged infusion), periprocedural myonecrosis was defined as troponin I increase by 3 times the ULN or by 50% of an elevated baseline value, whereas PMI as CKMB increase by 3 times the ULN or 50% of baseline. Platelet function was assessed by impedance aggregometry. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were included, 77 (45.8%) of whom were on DAPT at the time of PCI. Patients on DAPT had more often a history of previous PCI (p = 0.03), higher ACS at admission (p < 0.001) and creatinine levels (p = 0.03). Coronary calcifications and type C lesions were more frequent in patients without DAPT (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively), as much as TIMI flow < 3 (p = 0.03), while procedural characteristics were comparable. Baseline platelet reactivity was significantly reduced in DAPT treated patients (p < 0.001 for ASPI, COL and ADP tests). However the rate of periprocedural myonecrosis did not differ according to pre-procedural DAPT (68.4%vs 67%, p = 0.87; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.34[0.71-2.53], p = 0.36) and neither the occurrence of PMI (13.3% vs 12.6%, p = 0.99; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.24[0.51-3.1], p = 0.64). Furthermore, baseline platelet reactivity was similar in patients with and without PMI/myonecrosis with no relationship between platelet function and Troponin I peak. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI with adjunctive GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors, preprocedural DAPT and baseline platelet reactivity are not associated to the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction or myonecrosis. These data further support the role of periprocedural Gp IIb-IIIa inhibitors in order to overcome any suboptimal inhibition of platelet aggregation at the time of the procedure due to drug-resistance or delayed (downstream) administration of ADP antagonists, especially in complex high-risk procedures.

Impact of adenosine A2a receptor polymorphism rs5751876 on platelet reactivity in ticagrelor treated patients.

Dual antiplatelet therapy constitutes a key point in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. In particular, ticagrelor, an ADP-antagonist, can provide a more potent and predictable platelet inhibition as compared to clopidogrel, and adenosine-mediated pathways have been involved in its beneficial effects on mortality and myocardial perfusion. However, a quote of patients still displays a suboptimal platelet inhibition on ticagrelor, and, while the role of genetics in conditioning clopidogrel resistance is well established, few data have been reported for ticagrelor. We investigated the impact of rs5751876 C > T polymorphism of adenosine A2a receptor (ADORA2a) on platelet reactivity in patients during chronic treatment with ticagrelor. We included patients treated with ASA and ticagrelor for a recent ACS or elective coronary revascularization. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR for ticagrelor was defined as ADP-test results >417 AU*min. Genetic analysis was performed to assess the presence of rs5751876 C > T polymorphism of ADORA2a receptor. We included 244 patients in our study, 174 (71.3%) patients carried the polymorphism (T allele), 51 (20.9%) of them in homozygosis (T/T). C-allele carriers (homozygotes C/C and heterozygotes C/T) showed no difference in baseline characteristics but for lower HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.01). An absolute lower rate of HRPR on ticagrelor was observed in homozygotes T/T (p = 0.03). At multivariate analysis, C allele carriage was independently associated with the rate of HRPR on ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 4.63[1.02-21.01], p = 0.048). Our study results showed a significant independent association between rs5751876 allele C carriage and a higher rate of high residual platelet reactivity in patients on ticagrelor after a recent ACS or PCI.

Impact of Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Immature Platelet Count and Platelet Reactivity.

The immature platelet count (IPC) is a potential marker of platelet reactivity. We assessed the relationship between IPC during chronic dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the response to antiplatelet drugs (acetylsalycilic acid + clopidogrel/ticagrelor). We included 286 patients: 167 (58.4%) patients received ticagrelor and 119 (41.6%) received clopidogrel. At a median follow-up of 46.5 days, the variation in IPC displayed an absolute median (interquartile range [IQR]) of -11.9 × 103/µL (-182.7 to 160.8), corresponding to a median percentage change in IPC ([%ΔIPC] IQR) of -0.3% (-21.9% to 35.5%), with an increase in IPC levels in those on ticagrelor and a decrease in IPC levels in those on clopidogrel. We observed an inverse association of lower platelet reactivity at different tests and a higher increase in IPC ( r = -0.14, P = .04 for arachidonic acid test; r = -0.12, P = .05 for collagen test; and r = -0.13, P = .02 for adenosine diphosphate test [ADP]). The rate of poor effectiveness of ADP antagonists was the only independent predictor of a ΔIPC above the third tertile (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.32-0.99]; P = .048). We showed that in patients treated with chronic DAPT, an increase in IPC is significantly related to lower levels of platelet reactivity.

Vitamin D Binding Protein rs7041 polymorphism and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency represents a major health problem in general population, especially for its association with cardiovascular disorders and thrombotic risk, even in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Vitamin D Binding Protein (VDBP) is the main transporter of vitamin D in the bloodstream and genetic polymorphisms of this protein have been shown to account for a significant variability of vitamin D levels and its systemic effects. Contrasting data have linked the rs7041 T→G substitution with cardiovascular disease. However, no study has so far addressed the role of rs7041 polymorphism on platelet reactivity in patients on DAPT, that was the aim of the present study. METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) for an ACS or elective PCI were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90days post-discharge. Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate® (Roche Diagnostics AG), and VDBP genetic status by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. Fasting samples were obtained for main chemistry parameters and vitamin D levels assessment. RESULTS: We included 400 patients, 187 (46.8%) receiving clopidogrel and 213 (53.2%) ticagrelor. The genetic polymorphism rs7041 (T→G) was observed in 318 patients, (79.5%), in 38.7% of them in homozygosis. Main clinical and chemistry features did not significantly differ according to genetic status, but for a higher rate of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers use among the carriers of the G allele (p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively). VDBP genetic status did not affect the rate of HRPR with ADP-antagonists (25.6% vs 24.6% vs 28.5%, p=0.59; adjusted OR[95%CI]=0.94[0.52-1.7], p=0.83 for T/G patients; adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.14[0.6-2.2], p=0.67 for G homozygotes). However, the rate of HRPR with ADP-antagonists was influenced by severe hypovitaminosis D (< 10ng/ml) only in patients carrying the G allele, especially in homozygosis (T/T: 25.9% vs 26.1%, p=0.99; G carriers: 22.1% vs 35.3%, p=0.02, pinteraction=0.019; adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.93[1.11-3.34], p=0.02 for G carriers). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that rs7041 polymorphism of Vitamin D Binding Protein does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of HRPR among patients receiving DAPT. However the carriage of the G allele could condition the impact of hypovitaminosis D on the response to antiplatelet agents, increasing the occurrence of HRPR especially in homozygotes, thus suggesting a more significant role of vitamin D deficiency among these patients.

Impact of high-dose statins on vitamin D levels and platelet function in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Statins represent a pivotal treatment in coronary artery disease, offering a reduction in cardiovascular risk even beyond their lipid-lowering action. However, the mechanism of these "pleiotropic" benefits of statins is poorly understood. Vitamin D has been suggested as a potential mediator of the anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic and vascular protecting effects of statins. Aim of present study was to assess the impact of a high-intensity statin therapy on vitamin D levels and platelet function in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: Patients discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy and high-intensity statins after an ACS or elective PCI were scheduled for main chemistry and vitamin D levels assessment at 30-90days post-discharge. Vitamin D (25-OHD) dosing was performed by chemiluminescence method through the LIAISON® Vitamin D assay (Diasorin Inc). Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate® (multiple platelet function analyser; Roche Diagnostics AG). RESULTS: Among 246 patients included, 142 were discharged on a new statin therapy or with an increase in previous dose (Inc-S), while 104 were already receiving a high-dose statin at admission, that remained unchanged (Eq-S). Median follow-up was 75.5days. Patients in the Inc-S group were younger (p=0.01), smokers (p<0.001), with a less frequent history of hypercholesterolemia (p=0.05), diabetes (p=0.03), hypertension (p=0.02), or previous cardiovascular events (p<0.001). They were more often admitted for an acute coronary syndrome (p<0.001) and used less anti-hypertensive drugs or nitrates. Higher total circulating calcium was observed in the Inc-S group (p=0.004), while baseline vitamin D levels were similar in the 2 groups (p=0.30). A significant reduction in the circulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was observed in the Inc-S group. Vitamin D levels increased in the Inc-S patients but not in the Eq-S group (delta-25OHD: 23.2±20.5% vs 3.1±4.7%, p=0.003), with a linear relationship between the magnitude of vitamin D elevation and the reduction of LDL cholesterol (r=-0.17, p=0.01). Platelet reactivity was significantly lower in the Inc-S patients, when evaluating aggregation with different platelet activating stimuli (arachidonic acid, p=0.02, collagen, p=0.004, thrombin-activating peptide, p=0.07, ADP, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with coronary artery disease, the addition of a high-intensity statin treatment, besides the lipid-lowering effects, is associated to a significant increase in vitamin D levels and lower platelet reactivity, potentially providing explanation of the "pleiotropic" benefits of statins therapy in cardiovascular disease.

Vitamin D levels and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal platelet inhibition still represents an important challenge, especially for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, very few are known so far on the predictors of high-residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) despite antiplatelet strategies. Increasing attention has been paid in the last years to the role of vitamin D in atherothrombosis. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of vitamin D levels on platelet function in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) after a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective PCI were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Platelet function was assessed by whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®-Roche Diagnostics AG), HRPR was considered for ASPI test values > 862 AU*min (for ASA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists). Fasting samples were obtained for main chemistry parameters and vitamin D level assessment. Our population is represented by 503 patients, who were divided according to vitamin D quartiles (≤9.1; 9.2-14.4; 14.5-21.7; >21.7 ng/ml). Lower vitamin D levels related with age (p = 0.04), diabetic status (p = 0.05), and previous coronary surgery (p = 0.007), therapy with beta-blockers and statins (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02). Vitamin D inversely related to the levels of total cholesterol (p = 0.01), triglycerides (p < 0.001), hemoglobin (p = 0.05), and HbA1c (p < 0.001). Significantly higher platelet reactivity was observed after platelet stimulation with ADP (p = 0.01), but not with other platelet activators. The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low (1.2%) and not conditioned by Vitamin D levels (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.56[0.71-3.5], p = 0.27). HRPR with ADP-antagonists was observed in 26% of patients, and the rate increased with lower vitamin D quartiles (37.3% vs 22.2% vs 24.4% vs 20.2%, p = 0.005, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.23[1.02-1.49], p = 0.04). An absolute increase in HRPR with lower vitamin D levels was similarly observed among patients receiving ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.40[0.95-2.06], p = 0.08), and those on clopidogrel (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.31[0.99-1.75], p = 0.06). Thus, lower vitamin D levels are associated with higher platelet reactivity and impaired effectiveness of ADP-antagonists, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA. Future studies will tell whether vitamin D supplementation can reduce platelet reactivity, overcoming the phenomenon of resistance to antiplatelet agents.