The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score (NBD) is not suitable for patients with multiple sclerosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Bowel and anorectal dysfunctions are common in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The use of validated questionnaires is recommended in the initial assessment and patient's follow-up. The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score is the most used questionnaire but has been developed in spinal cord injured patients and has never been validated in other neurological diseases. We aimed to assess NBD's relevance in pwMS. SETTINGS: Monocentric study in a tertiary neuro-urology department. METHODS: A retrospective study in pwMS consulting for the first time in our department, that fulfilled the NBD questionnaire between 2010 and 2021 was performed. Qualitative and quantitative answers for each question were analyzed. Content validity and internal consistency were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five pwMS (mean age 47.1, 58% of women) fulfilled the NBD questionnaire. Mean NBD score was 6.0 (SD 6.1) and 75% of patients had a score <9. Content validity analysis revealed 4 items not appropriate, 1 item with irrelevant calibration, and omission of some treatment widely used in pwMS. Internal consistency was appreciated with Cronbach's alpha = 0.48 IC 95% [0.31; 0.6]. CONCLUSION: NBD questionnaire lacks content validity and presents a weak internal consistency in pwMS. A specific questionnaire is therefore required in pwMS to optimize bowel management and follow-up.

Cortical, Spinal, Sacral, and Peripheral Neuromodulations as Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Review.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is often associated with urological disorders, mainly urinary incontinence and retention, the management of which being necessary to improve patient's quality of life (QOL) and to reduce potential urological complications. Besides the classical treatments based mainly on anticholinergics and/or self-catheterization, several neuromodulation techniques have been tried in recent years to improve these urinary disorders. By this review, we aim at providing an overview of neuromodulation and electrostimulation approaches to manage urinary symptoms in MS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search using MEDLINE was performed. Only papers in English, and describing the effects of neuromodulation in MS patients, were considered. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Of them, four related to sacral neuromodulation (SNM), seven to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), six to spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and one to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). DISCUSSION: PTNS and SNM seem to be effective and safe therapeutic options for treating lower urinary tract symptoms in MS patients principally in case of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. Similarly, also SCS and TMS have been shown to be effective, despite the very limited number of patients and the small number of studies found in the literature. Interestingly, these techniques are effective even in patients who do not respond well to conservative therapies, such as anticholinergics. Furthermore, given their safety and efficacy, stimulations such as PTNS could be considered as a first-line treatment for OAB in MS patients, also considering that they are often preferred by patients to other commonly used treatments.