[A longitudinal study on left atrial thrombosis in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulants]. / Studio osservazionale sulla trombosi atriale sinistra nei pazienti con fibrillazione atriale non reumatica trattati con anticoagulante.

BACKGROUND: Although atrial thrombosis is common in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (NRAF) (6-27%), there are no studies about the effect that anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs have on it. AIM OF THE STUDY: We have investigated the role of anticoagulant therapy, followed by family physicians, on left atrial thrombosis detected via transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with NRAF. METHODS: Sixty patients enrolled in the TASAF (Trieste Area Study on non-rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation) (60% males, mean age 72 +/- 7 years, 17% with lone atrial fibrillation, duration of arrhythmia 111 +/- 79 months), in whom we found a left atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombus via TEE, were anticoagulated. The thrombus was in the left atrial appendage in 57 patients and in the left atrium in the others. In 28 of them it was mobile and in 50, the left atrial appendage flow was low or absent. Lastly, in 46 patients we found spontaneous echocontrast and a bilobate appendage was present in 8 of them. At follow-up, we repeated the TEE to evaluate the effect of the therapy on the atrial thrombosis. RESULTS: Only 53 patients received anticoagulant therapy (45 correctly), while 7 were treated with antiplatelet drugs by their family physicians. After a mean follow-up of 16 months, all patients underwent a repeat TEE and the thrombus was no longer evident in 35 cases (58%). The thrombosis disappeared in 26 (58%) of the 45 patients who correctly took anticoagulant therapy and in 5 of the 8 who were not adequately anticoagulated. Moreover, we didn't observe the thrombus in 4 of the 7 patients who were treated with antiplatelet drugs. There was no significant statistical difference between the benefits of anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy in dissolving left atrial thrombosis. During follow-up, we recorded only one embolic event in the retina. None of the patients on antiplatelet drugs complained of any side effects, whereas in 5 of the 53 on anticoagulant therapy, we recorded one fatal intracranial hemorrhage, one gastric hemorrhage and three minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial thrombosis in NRAF disappears in anticoagulated patients in an high percentage of cases (the therapy probably acts on more recent thrombi). Moreover, this therapy decreases the incidence of embolic events, although it increases the risk of hemorrages. Since the management of this preventive treatment in general medicine is very difficult, we hope that our health organization will establish Anticoagulation Clinics for the centralized management of this therapy.

Predictive value of heart rate in dilated cardiomyopathy treated with metoprolol.

UNLABELLED: Predictive factors of a favourable response to beta-blocker therapy are still unknown and the role of heart rate remains controversial. AIM: To investigate the relation between heart rate and the response to chronic metoprolol treatment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients with DCM, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 0.40 and blood pressure < or = 140/90 mmHg were treated with metoprolol, associated with digitalis, diuretics and ACE-inhibitors. After 24 +/- 6 months, 48 patients (49%) were classified as "improved" on the basis of a clinical/instrumental score. RESULTS: Rest, mean 24-hour and maximal exercise heart rate were all significantly and directly related to the probability of improvement, but heart rate at rest, supine and in upright position, showed the highest predictive power. The relationship between heart rate and improvement with metoprolol appeared to be non-linear, with an increasing probability in patients with higher heart rate, but with a fall of the slope in cases with extreme tachycardia. By dividing our study population on the basis of the most important clinical variables, this complex relation was evident only in patients at a more advanced stage of the disease. CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirms the strict relationship between heart rate and improvement with chronic metoprolol therapy in patients with DCM. This relation seems to be non-linear and is influenced by the severity of the disease.

Metoprolol in dilated cardiomyopathy: is it possible to identify factors predictive of improvement? The Heart Muscle Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Some controlled clinical trials showed a beneficial effect of beta-blockers on symptoms, exercise tolerance, and left ventricular function in dilated cardiomyopathy. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there are clinical variables at baseline that could predict a favorable response to long-term metoprolol therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Since November 1987, 94 consecutive patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.40 were treated with metoprolol (mean final dosage, 136 +/- 32 mg) associated with tailored medical therapy with digitalis, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Eighty-four surviving patients had a complete 2-year noninvasive follow-up period. Ten patients died or were transplanted before the final assessment. Improvement was defined according to a clinical score based on left ventricular ejection fraction (increase > or = 10 U), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (decrease > or = 10%), regression of restrictive filling pattern, New York Heart Association functional class, exercise tolerance (increase > or = 2 minutes), and cardiothoracic ratio (decrease > or = 10%). According to these criteria, 48 patients (51.1%) were classified as improved. Multivariate analysis identified a group of patients with a history of mild hypertension (blood pressure between 140/90 and 170/100 mmHg) and significantly higher probability of improvement with longterm metoprolol (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.94; P = .007). Among the 71 patients with normal blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg), heart rate in upright position (100 vs 75 beats/min: OR, 2; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-4.94; P = .003), left ventricular ejection fraction 0.20-0.33 versus less than 0.20 (OR, 4.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-21.04; P = .042), and New York Heart Association class I-II versus III-IV (OR, 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-7.75; P = .05) were significantly associated with a positive response to metoprolol. At baseline, both supine and upright heart rate were significantly higher in patients who improved, but heart rate in the upright position was the most significant predictor of improvement in patients with normal blood pressure at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: According to the authors' logit model, patients with a history of mild hypertension or with a higher resting heart rate, associated with controlled symptoms of heart failure (New York Heart Association class I-II) or moderate to severe left ventricular ejection fraction (range, 0.20-0.33) showed a remarkable probability of long-term (2-year) improvement on metoprolol.

Nonpredictive value of fibrosis in dilated cardiomyopathy treated with metoprolol.

Therapy with ß-adrenergic blocking agents has been advocated as a potential useful approach in heart failure. Recent studies suggest that histologic parameters may be helpful in assessing the effectiveness of ß-blocker treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). In order to predict the response to ß-blockers in DCM, fibrous tissue was evaluated at endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in 45 patients (pts) with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.28 ± 0.07, who were successively long-term treated with metoprolol (M) (mean dosage 138 ±26 mg/die). EMB was performed from left (n = 32) or right (n = 13) ventricle by means of a King's bioptome or the Cordis adaptation of this instrument. Quantification of fibrous tissue was performed at 9 × magnification and with a computerized morphometric system. Qualitative evaluation at light microscopy distinguished four types of fibrosis: pericellular, perivascular, focal, and endocardial. Volume fraction of fibrous tissue ranged from 1.3 to 35.5% (mean 12.1 ± 9.3%) and was not significantly correlated with any clinical variable considered. After 24 ± 12 months of treatment, 25 pts were considered improved (group A), whereas the remaining 20 pts were considered not improved (group B), according to criteria based on ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, filling pattern at Doppler-Echocardiography, cardiothoracic ratio, NYHA functional class, and exercise duration at ergometric test. Volume fraction of fibrous tissue did not differ significantly between the two groups (group A = 12.1 ± 9.1%; group B = 11.3 ± 9.6%;p = NS). Dominant pericellular type of fibrosis was equally distributed between the two groups (group A = 9 25 pts, 36%; group B = 10 20 pts, 50%), whereas a perivascular and/or focal replacement fibrosis was more frequent in group A (group A = 10 20 pts, 50%; group B = 2 20 pts, 10%; p = .05, OR 5.55 at univariate analysis). At multivariate analysis mean aortic blood pressure was the only variable discriminating the two groups; the type of fibrosis, although not statistically significant, maintained a high value of odds-ratio (5.23). In conclusion, extent of total fibrosis assessed by EMB may range widely in patients with DCM, is not correlated with the most important clinical variables, and is not predictive of long-term response to ß-blocker treatment. Otherwise, prevalent perivascular and/or focal replacement fibrosis could be associated with a higher probability of improvement after long-term ß-blocker treatment.

[Safety and tolerability of beta-blockers in severe cardiac decompensation from dilated cardiomyopathy]. / Tollerabilità ed effetti dei betabloccanti nello scompenso cardiaco severo da cardiomiopatia dilatativa.

BACKGROUND: Several reports from controlled and uncontrolled studies, mainly in the setting of heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), indicate that chronic betablockade may improve hemodynamics and clinical function. There are few reports on the effects of betablockers in patients with severe heart failure. METHODS: Thirty-five patients (27 M; 8 F; mean age 44.3 +/- 16.7 years; range 14-66 years) with DCM, advanced functional (NYHA III-IV) and severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF < or = 25%) underwent a test dosage with metoprolol (5 mg b.i.d.). Five patients (14%) did not tolerate the drug; 30 were chronically treated with metoprolol (mean dosage 127 +/- mg/die). No differences in baseline characteristics were observed between tolerant and not tolerant patients, except for the E-deceleration time (103 +/- 42 ms vs 84 +/- 17 ms; p<0.05). Seven alive patients did not reach a minimum follow up of 18 months. Nineteen patients (54.3%) had a follow up of at least 18 months. They were classified as ¿improved¿ (11 pts; and ¿not improved¿ (8 pts; 42%) on the basis of a score, which included left ventricular ejection fraction (> or = 0.10), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (> or = 10%), regression of restrictive filling pattern, NYHA functional class (> or = 1), cardio-thoracic ratio (> or = 10%) and exercise time (> or = 2 min). No differences were observed at baseline between ¿improved¿ and ¿not improved¿ patients, with exception for a history of slight hypertension (p<0.01), congestive heart failure score (p<0.04) and right ventricular function (p<0.05). RESULTS: An overall improvement of all the main clinical-instrumental parameters were observed in the 19 long term treated patients. At the end of follow up 16 long term treated patients were in NYHA class > or = 2 and in 9 LVEF was > or = 40%. During follow up, among the 30 patients who tolerated the drug, 1 pt died suddenly after 12 months of betablocker therapy and 5 pts were transplanted. No major events occurred among ¿improved¿ patients, after 24 +/- 6 months of follow-up. The actuarial survival curve of our study population shows that survival at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years was respectively 87%, 75%, 67% and 66%. These results confirm previous trials evidence that a progressively increasing dose of beta-blockers confers functional benefit in DCM with severe heart failure.

Changing mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy. The Heart Muscle Disease Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the changes in mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy over the past 15 years and to identify the factors that might have influenced survival. DESIGN: Follow up study of 235 patients (aged 16-70) systematically enrolled on a register from 1 January 1978 to 31 December 1992. SETTING: Hospital department of cardiology. PATIENTS: Three groups corresponding to three periods of 5 years: group 1 (diagnosis between 1 January 1978 and 31 December 1982) 26 patients; group 2 (diagnosis between 1 January 1983 and 31 December 1987) 65 patients; and group 3 (diagnosis between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 1992) 144 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death or heart transplantation. RESULTS: Two and four year survival was 73.8% and 53.8% in group 1, 87.7% and 72.3% in group 2, and 90.3% and 82.9% in group 3 (P = 0.02). During the 15 years of the study period the number of cases increased progressively and the baseline clinical characteristics changed (that is, patients were younger and less severely affected), partly explaining the improvement in survival. None the less, the three mortality curves tended to diverge progressively and the improvement in survival in the different groups was still significant after stratification for the severity of the disease, suggesting that treatment had a sustained effect. A progressively higher proportion of patients were treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and more recently with beta blockers. In group 2, after stratification for the severity of heart failure, patients who were treated with ACE inhibitors showed a better survival than patients who were not. Furthermore, analysis of group 3 showed that beta blockers had a significant additive effect with conventional therapy both by intention to treat and actual treatment. Four year survival in patients with mild and moderate to severe heart failure treated with beta blockers, and usually digitalis and ACE inhibitors, was respectively 90% and 87.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in the survival of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy over the past 15 years may be explained by earlier diagnosis, new treatments, and a change in the clinical characteristics of the patients at enrolment.

[New knowledge on the subject of therapy in cardiac decompensation in the light of large trials]. / Nuove conoscenze in tema di terapia dello scompenso cardiaco alla luce dei grandi trial.

Although an underlying disturbance in cardiac function can be identified in most patients with congestive heart failure, manifestations of the disease are greatly influenced by other factors, particularly neurohumoral and peripheral adaptive responses which occur secondary to impaired cardiac function. Until recently diuretic agents and digoxin formed the basis of conventional treatment of this condition. The majority of clinical trials published since 1980, indicate that digoxin lessens symptoms and reduces morbidity associated with congestive heart failure particularly in patients with more advanced symptoms and ventricular dysfunction. The efficacy of digitalis in congestive heart failure may in part result from sympathoinhibitory properties such as the activation of baroreceptorial mechanisms. At present there is no conclusive evidence that cardiac glycosides improve survival. Several trials clearly indicate that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (enalapril, captopril) can reduce both morbidity and mortality in symptomatic congestive heart failure. Asymptomatic patients like those with severe left ventricular dysfunction and those who are at high risk for left ventricular remodeling after anterior wall myocardial infarction may also benefit from ACE-inhibition therapy. Increasing evidence suggests that beta-adrenergic blockade can produce symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement in heart failure of idiopathic and ischemic aetiology. Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are required to determine the impact on survival of beta-blockers.

[Beta blocking agents in the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy: review of the literature and clinical experience with 67 patients]. / I betabloccanti nella terapia della cardiomiopatia dilatativa: revisione della letteratura ed esperienza clinica su 67 pazienti.

BACKGROUND: Several reports suggest that chronic beta blockade, most often with the beta 1 selective agent metoprolol, may improve hemodynamic and clinical function in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. However, controlled trials are limited and some studies have not shown beneficial effects in short term trials. Mechanisms of effectiveness are still debated and probably concern the capacity to avoid toxic myocardial damage by catecholamines, to induce receptor up-regulation, to contribute to the control of arrhythmias, to improve diastolic relaxation and other mechanisms. METHODS: After a revision of the literature, a preliminary clinical experience with metoprolol in dilated cardiomyopathy diagnosed according to the WHO definition is reported. Sixty-seven patients symptomatic for congestive heart failure or with complex ventricular arrhythmias associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction were submitted to test dose with metoprolol 5 mg bid for 2-7 days. All patients were completely studied, including coronary angiography and endomyocardial biopsy to exclude ischemic heart disease and active myocarditis. Four pts (6%) did not tolerate the first test dosage of metoprolol and twenty-two patients were excluded from analysis because of inadequate follow-up or because they were enrolled in an international trial. Forty-one patients underwent long-term treatment with metoprolol at a final mean dosage of 150 mg a day (range 50-200 mg) and are presently analyzed. The dosage was gradually increased during the first seven weeks. RESULTS: After 6 +/- 2 months and 12 +/- 2 months, 34 patients were stable or ameliorated (Group 1) and experienced an overall significant improvement of functional class (all pts in class I-II NYHA), of left and right ventricular ejection fraction (from 28 +/- 8.8% to 35.8 +/- 13.7% to 33.2 +/- 12.3% and from 38.6 +/- 11.8% to 42.4 +/- 5.8% to 45.2 +/- 12.2% respectively), of clinical signs of congestive heart failure, of cardiothoracic index, of left ventricular diameters and of arrhythmic pattern. Furthermore, the rate of ventricular couplets > 20/24h and of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia changed respectively from 46% and 54% to 4% and 21% at 12 +/- 2 months. None in Group 1 died nor is any waiting for heart transplantation. Eleven patients (Group 2) did not tolerate the drug acutely (4 pts) or deteriorated during the first 6 +/- 2 months (7 pts) of the treatment. In this group a worsening or an insignificant variation of all clinical and instrumental parameters was observed. During follow-up four patients of this group underwent heart transplantation (one died shortly after the operation because of infective complications), one died while waiting, two are currently waiting for heart transplantation, and three are still in heart failure (class III NYHA). No cases of sudden death occurred in any group of patients (15 pts with follow-up > 12 mo). CONCLUSIONS: Our uncontrolled study seems to confirm the beneficial effect of betablockers in a subgroup of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The characterization of responders to this therapy is still undefined and will constitute the aim of future analyses.