Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Law Hum Behav ; 25(5): 529-45, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11688372

ABSTRACT

This research compared 40 adults with mild developmental disabilities (DD) and 40 nondelayed adults (ND) in terms of knowledge of legal terms and court proceedings. For all of the 34 terms studied, with the exception of "police office" there were significant differences between the DD and ND groups with respect to degree of conceptual understanding of terms. Results indicate that all but 6 terms assessed (adjourn, allegation, crown attorney, defendant, prosecute, and court reporter) were well-defined by 85% or more of ND participants. In contrast, only 8 of the terms (police officer, lawyer, jail, court, lie, truth, judge, and witness) were reasonably conceptually understood by at least 75% of DD participants. Reported familiarity with terms in DD participants is not a reliable indicator of actual familiarity with terms. Results are discussed with respect to the need for education of DD individuals and legal professionals to support participation and fair treatment of DD individuals in legal situations.


Subject(s)
Criminal Law/legislation & jurisprudence , Educational Status , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Persons with Mental Disabilities/psychology , Terminology as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Knowledge , Male , Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Competency/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Ontario , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Pediatrics ; 88(3): 512-8, 1991 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1881731

ABSTRACT

Sixty-one parents of 43 neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit were interviewed within 3 days of their first conference with the neonatologist to assess their needs for medical information. The conference with the physician and the interview with the investigator were audiotaped. Information given by the physician and information recalled by the parents was categorized and rated by the investigator. The physicians gave very detailed information about diagnosis in 77% of cases whereas 39% of the parents recalled diagnostic information in great detail. Respective percentages for prognosis were 16 and 33; for current management (eg, investigation, therapy), 28 and 66; and for cause of illness, 16 and 18. The statistical significance of the differences between the very detailed information int he physician-parent conferences and in the parent-investigator interviews was, by category, less than .002, less than .041, less than .004, and not significant, respectively. Information in the respective categories was described as "most helpful" by 20%, 67%, 90%, and 8% of parents. All but one of the parents stated that they wanted the whole truth. Physician uncertainty in providing information was significantly associated with severity of illness. It is concluded that while parents wanted information in all categories, they paid most attention to that relating to management. Physician-parent discordances with respect to information about management, diagnosis, and prognosis suggest directions for future investigation of the optimal content of information for parents in this context.


Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Parents/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Adult , Female , Health Status , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Mental Recall , Parents/education , Prognosis , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...