Accuracy and reliability of forensic handwriting comparisons.

Forensic handwriting examination involves the comparison of writing samples by forensic document examiners (FDEs) to determine whether or not they were written by the same person. Here we report the results of a large-scale study conducted to assess the accuracy and reliability of handwriting comparison conclusions. Eighty-six practicing FDEs each conducted up to 100 handwriting comparisons, resulting in 7,196 conclusions on 180 distinct comparison sets, using a five-level conclusion scale. Erroneous "written by" conclusions (false positives) were reached in 3.1% of the nonmated comparisons, while 1.1% of the mated comparisons yielded erroneous "not written by" conclusions (false negatives). False positive rates were markedly higher for nonmated samples written by twins (8.7%) compared to nontwins (2.5%). Notable associations between training and performance were observed: FDEs with less than 2 y of formal training generally had higher error rates, but they also had higher true positive and true negative rates because they tended to provide more definitive conclusions; FDEs with at least 2 y of formal training were less likely to make definitive conclusions, but those definitive conclusions they made were more likely to be correct (higher positive predictive and negative predictive values). We did not observe any association between writing style (cursive vs. printing) and rates of errors or incorrect conclusions. This report also provides details on the repeatability and reproducibility of conclusions, and reports how conclusions are affected by the quantity of writing and the similarity of content.

Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.

The interpretation of footwear evidence relies on the expertise of forensic footwear examiners. Here we report on the largest study to date of the accuracy, reproducibility (inter-examiner variation), and repeatability (intra-examiner variation) of footwear examiners' decisions. In this study, 84 practicing footwear examiners each conducted up to 100 comparisons between questioned footwear impressions (provided as photographs and digital images) and known footwear (provided as photographs, transparent test impressions, and digital images), resulting in a total of 6610 comparisons. The quality and characteristics of the impressions were selected to be broadly representative of those encountered in casework. A multilevel conclusion scale was used: 40% of responses were definitive conclusions (identification or exclusion), 14% probable conclusions (high degree of association or indications of non-association), 40% class associations (association of class characteristics or limited association of class characteristics), and 6% neutral conclusions (inconclusive or not suitable). On nonmated comparisons, 0.2% of conclusions were erroneous identifications (false positives), and 1.4% were incorrect responses of "high degree of association." The majority of erroneous identifications were made by a single participant. On mated comparisons, 6.0% of conclusions were erroneous exclusions (false negatives), and 1.8% were incorrect responses of "indications of non-association." Erroneous conclusions were sometimes reproduced by different examiners, but rarely repeated by the same examiner-1.1% of erroneous identifications were reproduced (none were repeated) and 19.9% of erroneous exclusions were reproduced (just one was repeated). Examiners' assessments of whether a questioned impression was suitable for comparison were notably inconsistent and may benefit from standardization. Rates of correct definitive conclusions are directly associated with the quality of the questioned impression and the extent of class similarities/differences between the questioned impression and known footwear.

Non-invasive detection of superimposed latent fingerprints and inter-ridge trace evidence by infrared spectroscopic imaging.

Current latent print and trace evidence collecting technologies are usually invasive and can be destructive to the original deposits. We describe a non-invasive vibrational spectroscopic approach that yields latent fingerprints that are overlaid on top of one another or that may contain trace evidence that needs to be distinguished from the print. Because of the variation in the chemical composition distribution within the fingerprint, we demonstrate that linear unmixing applied to the spectral content of the data can be used to provide images that reveal superimposed fingerprints. In addition, we demonstrate that the chemical composition of the trace evidence located in the region of the print can potentially be identified by its infrared spectrum. Thus, trace evidence found at a crime scene that previously could not be directly related to an individual, now has the potential to be directly related by its presence in the individual-identifying fingerprints.

Infrared spectroscopic imaging for noninvasive detection of latent fingerprints.

The capability of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic imaging to provide detailed images of unprocessed latent fingerprints while also preserving important trace evidence is demonstrated. Unprocessed fingerprints were developed on various porous and nonporous substrates. Data-processing methods used to extract the latent fingerprint ridge pattern from the background material included basic infrared spectroscopic band intensities, addition and subtraction of band intensity measurements, principal components analysis (PCA) and calculation of second derivative band intensities, as well as combinations of these various techniques. Additionally, trace evidence within the fingerprints was recovered and identified.