Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid: 90-day complication profile in the inpatient versus outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a nonspherical humeral head component and inlay glenoid is a successful bone-preserving treatment for glenohumeral arthritis. This study aimed to describe the 90-day complication profile of TSA with this prosthesis and compare major and minor complication and readmission rates between inpatient- and outpatient-procedure patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing TSA with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid in the inpatient and outpatient settings by a single surgeon between 2017 and 2022. Age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and 90-day complication and readmission rates were compared between inpatient and outpatient groups. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen TSAs in 111 patients were identified. Mean age was 64.9 years (range, 39-90) and 65% of patients were male. Ninety-four (80%) and 24 (20%) patients underwent outpatient and inpatient procedures, respectively. Four complications (3.4%) were recorded: axillary nerve stretch injury, isolated ipsilateral arm deep venous thrombosis (DVT), ipsilateral arm DVT with pulmonary embolism requiring readmission, and gastrointestinal bleed requiring readmission. There were no reoperations or other complications. Outpatients were younger with lower ASA and CCI scores than inpatients; however, there was no difference in complications (1/24 vs. 3/94, P=1.00) or readmissions (1/24 vs. 1/94, P=0.37) between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: TSA with a nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid can be performed safely in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Rates of early complications and readmissions were low with no difference according to surgical setting. Level of evidence: IV.

Variation in radial head fracture treatment recommendations in terrible triad injuries is not influenced by viewing two-dimensional computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed association between viewing two-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) images in addition to radiographs with radial head treatment recommendations after accounting for patient and surgeon factors in a survey-based experiment. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four surgeons reviewed 15 patient scenarios with terrible triad fracture dislocations of the elbow. Surgeons were randomized to view either radiographs only or radiographs and 2D CT images. The scenarios randomized patient age, hand dominance, and occupation. For each scenario, surgeons were asked if they would recommend fixation or arthroplasty of the radial head. Multi-level logistic regression analysis identified variables associated with radial head treatment recommendations. RESULTS: Reviewing 2D CT images in addition to radiographs had no statistical association with treatment recommendations. A higher likelihood of recommending prosthetic arthroplasty was associated with older patient age, patient occupation not requiring manual labor, surgeon practice location in the United States, practicing for five years or less, and the subspecialties "trauma" and "shoulder and elbow." CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that in terrible triad injuries, the imaging appearance of radial head fractures has no measurable influence on treatment recommendations. Personal surgeon factors and patient demographic characteristics may have a larger role in surgical decision making. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic case-control study.

Measurement of the gluteal compartment pressures: A cadaveric study describing safety and reproducibility of two methods.

INTRODUCTION: Gluteal compartment syndrome is an uncommon entity and physicians may use intracompartmental pressure measurements for confirmation of the clinical diagnosis, or in cases where the physical exam is indeterminate. However, there is a paucity of literature describing a safe and reproducible technique to measure gluteal intracompartmental pressures during the diagnosis of gluteal compartment syndrome. The purpose of this cadaveric study is to evaluate the sole previous technique described in the literature to measure gluteal intracompartmental pressures and provide a modified technique which can be safely and reliably utilized clinically. METHODS: A cadaveric study with three phases was performed in 16 gluteal regions in 8 cadavers. In the first phase, the previously described technique was assessed. In the second phase, a modified set of techniques was created and evaluated. In the third phase, inter-user reliability of the modified set of techniques was assessed and calculated using Cohen's ĸ coefficient. In all three phases, methylene blue was injected through pressure monitoring needles into the gluteus maximus (GMax), gluteus medius/minimus (GMM), and the tensor fascia lata (TFL) compartments. Following dissection, rate of successful penetration into each targeted compartment and distance from the neurovascular structures was recorded. RESULTS: The previously described set of techniques was found to be variable. The modified set of techniques was effective, successfully reaching the GMax, GMM, and TFL compartments in 100%, 100%, and 81% of attempts, respectively. Inter-user reliability was excellent (ĸ = 1) for the techniques to reach both the GMax and GMM compartments, and moderate (ĸ = 0.54) for the technique to reach the TFL compartment. Within the GMax, the pressure monitoring needle was at a mean of 5.4±0.6 cm, 4.1±0.7 cm, 6.4±0.5 cm from the sciatic nerve (SN), superior gluteal nerve (SGN), and inferior gluteal nerve (IGN), respectively. Within the GMM, the pressure monitoring needle was at a mean of 9.7±1.4 cm, 7.4±1.3 cm, 11.1±1.7 cm from the SN, SGN, and IGN, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified set of techniques presented allows the three gluteal compartments to be safely and reproducibly reached to measure intracompartmental pressures during the diagnosis of gluteal compartment syndrome.