Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Main subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Heart J Open ; 4(3): oeae041, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863522

ABSTRACT

Aims: Layer-specific left ventricular (LV) strain alterations have been suggested as a specific finding in Fabry disease (FD). Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of layer-specific radial strain (RS) indices compared to the established LV regional strain pattern in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and FD, i.e. apical sparing and posterolateral strain deficiency (PLSD). Methods and results: We retrospectively analysed the global, subendocardial, subepicardial LV radial strain, the corresponding strain gradient, as well as the regional and global longitudinal strain. The diagnostic accuracy of the diverse LV strain analyses was comparatively assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve and multivariable regression analyses. In 40 FD and 76 CA patients, CA featured more reduced layer strain values [global RS -12.3 (-15.6 to -9.6) in CA vs. -16.7 (-20.0 to -13.6) in FD; P < 0.001; subendocardial RS -22.3 (-27.4 to -15.9) vs. -28.3 (-31.8 to -23.6), P < 0.001; subepicardial RS -6.6 (-8.6 to -4.7) in CA vs. -8.9 (-11.7 to - 6.5) in FD; P < 0.001]. Global radial and longitudinal strain held an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 (0.66-0.84) and AUC 0.73 (0.63-0.83). While the apical sparing and PLSD strain pattern showed the highest accuracy as single parameters [AUC 0.87 (0.79-0.95) and 0.81 (0.72-0.89), P < 0.001], the combination of subendocardial RS and the apical sparing pattern featured the highest diagnostic accuracy [AUC 0.92 (0.87-0.97)]. Conclusion: Combining radial strain-derived parameters to the established strain pattern apical sparing and PLSD improve the diagnostic accuracy in the echocardiographic assessment in suspected storage disease.

2.
J Neurol ; 270(10): 4673-4677, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515731

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Neurological symptoms associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination were discovered in the context of billions of administered vaccine doses. The clinical manifestations often resemble post Coronavirus Disease 2019 (post-COVID-19) syndrome (PCS) features and may be considered as post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PVS). Data regarding frequency, severity and pathophysiological mechanisms are scarce. METHODS: We assessed routine clinical examinations in 50 patients reporting new-onset neurological symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, including neurological examination, laboratory and electrophysiology tests, as well as self-report questionnaires measuring fatigue, depressive symptoms, anxiety, risk of somatic symptom disorder, and health-related quality of life. Patients were included when symptoms occurred after confirmed COVID-19 vaccination and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and if no alternative diagnosis was found to explain the symptoms. RESULTS: The most frequently reported symptoms were paraesthesia (56%), fatigue (46%) and cognitive impairment (36%). Neurological, routine laboratory, and electrophysiological examinations did not yield distinct pathological findings. Neuropsychological testing of a subgroup revealed deficits in attention, executive function and memory. DISCUSSION: The spectrum of clinical manifestations post-vaccination poses a substantial overlap with PCS symptoms. As no pathological findings were obtained in routine diagnostics, uncertainty remains about the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and requires further investigation beyond routine work-up.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , Fatigue/etiology , Neurologic Examination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...