Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fam Syst Health ; 37(3): 263-265, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31343183

ABSTRACT

The communicative practice of pathography, or illness narratives, is emerging within the field of medical humanities. Pathography is a modality through which one may express their embodied experience of illness and their relations with the health care system. Offering voice and agency to the patient, pathography also holds potential as an empathy training tool for medical staff. Research is illuminating the ways in which illness narratives can act as a bridge between the lived experiences of the ill and the institutional treatment practices of the health care system. "Conversations With Buer" is an example of a personal illness narrative depicting the interaction between mental illness, gendered subjectivity, and health care services. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Family Relations/psychology , Humanities/trends , Mental Disorders/complications , Humanities/psychology , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 102(6): 1057-1066, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30642716

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify and summarize evidence on interventions to promote the adoption of shared decision-making (SDM) among health care professionals (HCPs) in clinical practice. METHODS: Electronic databases including: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane library were searched to determine eligible peer-reviewed articles. Grey literature was searched for additional interventions. Eligibility screening and data extraction were independently completed. Results are presented as written evidence summaries and tables. RESULTS: Our search yielded 238 articles that met our inclusion criteria. Interventions mostly targeted physicians (46%), had multiple educational modalities (46%), and were administered in group settings (44%) before the clinical encounter (71%). Very few were developed based on the learning needs of targeted HCPs (24%). Many of the SDM outcome tools used for evaluation were developed for the respective study and lacked evidence of validity and reliability (30%). CONCLUSION: We identified a sizable number of interventions to promote the adoption of SDM, however, these interventions were heterogeneous in their assessments for effectiveness and implementation. Therefore, it is a challenge to infer which strategies and practices are best to promote SDM adoption. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The need for evidence-based standards for developing SDM interventions targeting HCPs and assessing acceptability, effectiveness and implementation is suggested.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Patient Participation , Professional-Patient Relations , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Patient Education as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...