Efficacy of surface sampling methods for different types of beryllium compounds.

The objective of the research work was to evaluate the efficiency of three different sampling methods (Ghost Wipe™, micro-vacuum, and ChemTest®) in the recovery of Be dust by assessing: (1) four Be compounds (beryllium acetate, beryllium chloride, beryllium oxide and beryllium aluminium), (2) three different surfaces (polystyrene, glass and aluminium) and (3) inter-operator variation. The three sampling methods were also tested on site in a laboratory of a dental school for validation purposes. The Ghost Wipe™ method showed recovery ranging from 43.3% to 85.8% for all four Be compounds and for all three quantities of Be spiked on Petri dishes, while recovery with the micro-vacuum method ranged from 0.1% to 12.4%. On polystyrene dishes with 0.4 µg Be, the recovery ranged from 48.3% to 81.7%, with an average recovery of 59.4% for Operator 1 and 68.4% for Operator 2. The ChemTest® wipe method with beryllium acetate, beryllium chloride, and AlBeMet® showed analogous results that are in line with the manufacturer's manual, but collection of beryllium oxide was negative. In the dental laboratory, Ghost Wipe™ samplings showed better recovery than the micro-vacuum method. The ratios between the recovered quantities of Be in each location where the Ghost Wipe™ was tested differed substantially, ranging from 1.45 to 64. In the dental laboratory, a faint blue color indicating the presence of Be was observed on the ChemTest® wipes used in two locations out of six. In summary, the Ghost Wipe™ method was more efficient than micro-vacuuming in collecting the Be dust from smooth, non-porous surfaces such as Petri dishes by a factor of approximately 18. The results obtained on site in a dental laboratory also showed better recovery with Ghost Wipes™. However, the ratio of Be recovered by Ghost Wipes™ versus micro-vacuuming was much lower for surfaces where a large amount of dust was present. Wet wiping is preferred over micro-vacuuming for beryllium forms, but this conclusion probably applies to the ultra-low particulate loading levels (0.4 micrograms or less) which was tested in this study.

Beryllium aerosol characteristics in the magnesium and aluminum transformation industry in Quebec: a comparison of four different sampling methodologies.

To examine the influence of the sampling method on beryllium (Be) exposure assessment, a study was conducted in foundries and smelters to contrast the performance of five different dust sampling devices. Six sampling surveys were conducted in four different settings, and both personal and fixed station samples were collected using the following sampling heads: IOM samplers (inhalable dust), 35-mm plastic cassettes (total dust), aluminum SKC cyclones (respirable dust), 8-stage Sierra cascade impactors, and 12-stage MOUDI impactors. In total, beryllium concentrations were determined for 66/68 inhalable dust samples, 62/62 total dust samples, 56/57 respirable dust samples, 54/64 8-stage Sierra samples, and 19/25 12-stage MOUDI samples. In the magnesium foundry and aluminum smelters, the concentrations obtained during specific tasks could exceed the actual permissible exposure limit of the province of Quebec (0.15 microg/m(3)) or of the ACGIH threshold limit value (TLV) (0.05 microg/m(3)). The median of median dust concentration ratios computed from the sampling heads at the fixed station decreased as follows: IOM (1.00) > Sierra (0.76) > 37-mm cassette (0.61) > MOUDI (0.48) > respirable (0.12). The same trends were observed with the ratios of the median of median Be concentrations at the fixed station but with a larger scattering within sampling heads as follows: IOM (1.00) > Sierra (0.69) > 37-mm cassette (0.64) > MOUDI (0.54) > respirable (0.19). The median of median ratios of dust (IOM (1.00) > Sierra (0.56) > 37-mm cassette (0.35) > respirable (0.06)) and Be (IOM (1.00) > Sierra (0.66) > 37-mm cassette (0.48) > respirable (0.11)) in dust were lower, and there was less scattering for the 37-mm cassette and SKC cyclone used during breathing zone sampling than for the same sampling heads at the fixed station. Inhalable aerosol measurements should remain the tool for estimating the risk of exposure to beryllium in these settings until a clear dose response is established for these sampling heads.

Beryllium decontamination with different solvents on different structures.

The objective of the present work was to estimate the efficiency of moistened wipes in removing beryllium with different solutions including Citranox, Alconox, NaCl 5%, Resolve, and Ledizolv on various types of surfaces such as unpainted metal, wood frames, painted metal, concrete, painted concrete, and Plexiglas from three different occupational settings. Of the three plants that were investigated, only surfaces in the aluminium smelter were decontaminated down to the clearance reference level of 0.2 microg 100 cm(-2), with all the solvents used. In the machine tooling and milling department, the clearance level of 0.2 microg 100 cm(-2) was reached after the three decontaminations, with all the solvents. In the machine plant for the military, aerospace, and telecommunications industries, the beryllium concentrations on the concrete wall, before decontamination with the high-pressure gun, were usually >3 microg 100 cm(-2), and concentrations as high as 31 microg 100 cm(-2) were measured. After the high-pressure cleanup, the beryllium concentrations were sometimes reduced by a factor of 10, but never reached the clearance level. Beryllium compounds that had adhered to most types of structures that we attempted to decontaminate were reduced to below the clearance reference value except on concrete floors. There did not seem to be any difference between the decontamination actions for all the solvents used in this study.

Solvent removal of beryllium from surfaces of equipment made of beryllium copper.

Exposure to beryllium compounds, both by inhalation and skin contact, may result in immune sensitization and chronic beryllium disease. The objective of the present research work was to study the feasibility of removing beryllium compounds from the surfaces of devices made of Be-Cu alloy and to estimate the frequency at which the surfaces had to be rubbed in order to evaluate the likelihood that beryllium can be removed from the surfaces by serial wipe sampling at concentrations exceeding the US Department of Energy (DOE) standard limit of 0.2 microg per 100 cm2. The standard limit was exceeded after successive cleanings of moulds and plates made of Be-Cu alloy with solvents such Citranox, an acidic solvent, Alconox, Z-99 and Fantastik, basic solvents, or more neutral solvents such as Luminox and water. Citranox was the best solvent for extracting beryllium from the tested surfaces, while Alconox seemed to be the second best one. In general, warm water, Luminox and Z-99 seemed to be less efficient for extracting Be from all equipment. The results of the present study suggest that Ghost Wipes, when passed across a surface under the firm pressure of an individual's hand, can be used to detect beryllium contamination. However, they seem to show low reliability for quantification. From a safety standpoint in occupational settings, workers should be offered skin protection and respiratory protection if they have to handle devices made of Be-Cu alloy.

Personal and static sample measurements of asbestos fibres during two abatement projects.

Exposure assessment was performed during the abatement of amosite containing material (ACM) and chrysotile containing material (CCM). Mean fibre concentrations (MFC) in breathing zone (BZ) were 20.6+/-7.9 f/cc and 6.3+/-2.2 f/cc during abatements of ACM and CCM, respectively. At the fixed station, MFC were 5.4+/-3.5 f/cc for ACM and 2.9 f/cc+/-1.6 for CCM. For observer's BZ, MFC were 3.1+/-1.3 f/cc (ACM) and 1.8 f/cc (CCM) during the abatement. Though elevated, area and observer-type samples clearly underestimate exposure. Exposure remained unacceptable in the worksite with the class of respiratory protection used.

SSR181507, a dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist and 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, alleviates disturbances of novelty discrimination in a social context in rats, a putative model of selective attention deficit.

RATIONALE: Selective attention deficit, characterised by the inability to differentiate relevant from irrelevant information, is considered to underlie many cognitive deficits of schizophrenia, and appears to be only marginally responsive to treatment with current antipsychotics. OBJECTIVES: We compared the activity of the putative atypical antipsychotic SSR181507 (a dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist and 5HT(1A) receptor agonist) with reference compounds, on disturbances of novelty discrimination in a social context in rats, a behavioural paradigm that putatively models selective attention deficit. METHODS: A first (familiar) juvenile rat was presented to an adult rat for a period (P1) of 30 min. A second (novel) juvenile was then introduced at the end of P1 for a period (P2) of 5 min. The ability of the adult rat to discriminate between the two juveniles, presented at the same time, was evaluated by measuring the ratio of the time spent in interaction with the novel vs the familiar juvenile during P2. RESULTS: Adult rats spent more time exploring the novel than the familiar juvenile. This novelty discrimination capacity was disrupted by: (1) parametric modification of the procedure (reduction of time spent in contact with the familiar juvenile during P1); (2) acute injection of psychotomimetics that are known to induce schizophrenia-like symptoms in humans, such as phencyclidine (PCP; 3 mg/kg, i.p.) and d-amphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and (3) neonatal treatment with PCP (three injections of 10 mg/kg, s.c.), a model based on the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. The potential atypical antipsychotic SSR181507 (0.03-3 mg/kg, i.p.) and the atypical antipsychotics clozapine (0.1-1 mg/kg, i.p.) and amisulpride (1-3 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated deficits in novelty discrimination produced by parametric manipulation and by acute or neonatal treatment with PCP. The typical antipsychotic haloperidol (up to 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated only deficits in novelty discrimination produced by parametric modification. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these results suggest that SSR181507 can alleviate disturbances of novelty discrimination in a social context in rats, and that this paradigm may represent a suitable animal model of selective attention deficits observed in schizophrenia.

SSR181507, a putative atypical antipsychotic with dopamine D2 antagonist and 5-HT1A agonist activities: improvement of social interaction deficits induced by phencyclidine in rats.

Social behaviour is frequently impaired in schizophrenic patients, and current antipsychotics appear poorly effective in alleviating this deficit. SSR181507 is a selective dopamine D2 receptor antagonist and 5-HT1A receptor agonist [Neuropsychopharmacology 28 (2003) 2064] with an atypical antipsychotic profile and additional antidepressant/anxiolytic activities [Neuropsychopharmacology 28 (2003) 1889]. Here, we sought to assess the efficacy of SSR181507, and of reference antipsychotics and antidepressant/anxiolytics, to counteract phencyclidine (PCP)-induced social interaction deficit in rats. Pairs of unfamiliar rats were placed for 10 min each day into a dimly lit arena, during four consecutive days. On the test day (5th day), each pair was placed into the arena 30 min after i.p. treatment with PCP (or vehicle) and a challenge compound or vehicle (same for both rats, i.p. or s.c.). The time spent in social interaction was scored during 10 min. PCP (1 mg/kg) decreased social interaction time by about 35%. This effect was fully antagonized by pre-treatment with SSR181507 (1 mg/kg). In contrast, neither haloperidol (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) nor clozapine (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) antagonized this PCP-induced deficit. The selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg s.c.), but not the anxiolytic diazepam (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg), also improved social interaction impairment in PCP-treated rats: this would indicate that the 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of SSR181507 are responsible for the reversal of PCP-induced social deficit. These data suggest that, in addition to its atypical antipsychotic profile and antidepressant/anxiolytic activities, SSR181507 has a potential therapeutic activity in another key feature of schizophrenia poorly controlled by current antipsychotics, namely deterioration in social functioning.

Exaggerated bronchoconstriction due to inhalation challenges with occupational agents.

Inhalation challenges with occupational agents are used to confirm the aetiology of occupational asthma. It has been proposed that using closed-circuit equipment rather than the realistic challenge method would improve the methodology of these tests. Changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were examined in 496 subjects with "positive specific inhalation challenges", i.e. changes in FEVI of > or = 20% after exposure to an occupational agent, including 357 subjects exposed by the realistic method, 108 using the closed-circuit method and 31 by both methods. For immediate reactions, 18 of 95 (19%) showed changes in FEV1 of > or = 30% with the closed-circuit method, whereas a significantly larger proportion, i.e. 77 of 200 (38.5%), showed such changes using the realistic method. As regards nonimmediate reactions, changes in FEV1 of > or = 30% occurred in 16 of 43 (37%) cases with the closed-circuit method as compared to a larger proportion, i.e. 87 of 180 (48%) cases, using the realistic method. This favourable effect was significantly more pronounced in workers with higher levels of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. It is concluded that, for agents that can be generated using the closed-circuit method, use of such apparatus results in a smaller proportion of exaggerated bronchoconstriction than does the realistic method, this being particularly true for low-molecular weight agents.

SSR591813, a novel selective and partial alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor agonist with potential as an aid to smoking cessation.

(5aS,8S,10aR)-5a,6,9,10-Tetrahydro,7H,11H-8,10a-methanopyrido[2',3':5,6]pyrano[2,3-d]azepine (SSR591813) is a novel compound that binds with high affinity to the rat and human alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes (Ki = 107 and 36 nM, respectively) and displays selectivity for the alpha4beta2 nAChR (Ki, human alpha3beta4 > 1000, alpha3beta2 = 116; alpha1beta1deltagamma > 6000 nM and rat alpha7 > 6000 nM). Electrophysiological experiments indicate that SSR591813 is a partial agonist at the human alpha4beta2 nAChR subtype (EC50 = 1.3 micro M, IA =19% compared with the full agonist 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium). In vivo findings from microdialysis and drug discrimination studies confirm the partial intrinsic activity of SSR591813. The drug increases dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens shell (30 mg/kg i.p.) and generalizes to nicotine or amphetamine (10-20 mg/kg i.p.) in rats, with an efficacy approximately 2-fold lower than that of nicotine. Pretreatment with SSR591813 (10 mg/kg i.p.) reduces the dopamine-releasing and discriminative effects of nicotine. SSR591813 shows activity in animal models of nicotine dependence at doses devoid of unwanted side effects typically observed with nicotine (hypothermia and cardiovascular effects). The compound (10 mg/kg i.p.) also prevents withdrawal signs precipitated by mecamylamine in nicotine-dependent rats and partially blocks the discriminative cue of an acute precipitated withdrawal. SSR591813 (20 mg/kg i.p.) reduces i.v. nicotine self-administration and antagonizes nicotine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats. The present results confirm important role for alpha4beta2 nAChRs in mediating nicotine dependence and suggest that SSR591813, a partial agonist at this particular nAChR subtype, may have therapeutic potential in the clinical management of smoking cessation.

SR141716, a central cannabinoid (CB(1)) receptor antagonist, blocks the motivational and dopamine-releasing effects of nicotine in rats.

The central CB(1) cannabinoid receptor has recently been implicated in brain reward function. In the present study we evaluated first the effects of the selective CB(1) receptor antagonist, SR141716, on the motivational effects of nicotine in the rat. Administration of SR141716 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) decreased nicotine self-administration (0.03 mg/kg/injection). SR141716 (0.3-3 mg/kg) neither substituted for nicotine nor antagonized the nicotine cue in a nicotine discrimination procedure, but dose-dependently (0.01-1 mg/kg) antagonized the substitution of nicotine for D-amphetamine, in rats trained to discriminate D-amphetamine. Secondly, using brain microdialysis, SR141716 (1-3 mg/kg) blocked nicotine-induced dopamine release in the shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. To investigate whether SR141716 would block the dopamine-releasing effects of another drug of abuse, we extended the neurochemical study to the effect of ethanol, consumption of which in rodents is reduced by SR141716. Dopamine release induced by ethanol in the NAc was also reduced by SR141716 (3 mg/kg). These results suggest that activation of the endogenous cannabinoid system may participate in the motivational and dopamine-releasing effects of nicotine and ethanol. Thus, SR141716 may be effective in reduction of alcohol consumption, as previously suggested, and as an aid for smoking cessation.

Effects of SR48968, a selective non-peptide NK2 receptor antagonist on emotional processes in rodents.

RATIONALE: It has been suggested that tachykinin NK(2) receptor antagonists may have therapeutic utility in anxiety and/or depressive disorders. OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the modulatory action of the NK(2) receptor antagonist SR48968 on emotional processes in rodents. METHODS: The tests used include classical models of anxiety (punished lever pressing and punished drinking conflict tests, elevated plus-maze in rats), a model based on defensive behaviors of mice confronted with a natural threat (a rat), and two tests based on exposure of rats or mice to a natural predator (a cat) followed by subsequent exposure to a cat odor cue. The prototypical anxiolytic diazepam was used throughout as a positive control, the antidepressant imipramine was tested in the mouse defense test battery and in both models of predatory exposure, and the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist antalarmin was used in the cat-exposure test in rats. RESULTS: Unlike diazepam, SR48968 failed to increase rates of responding suppressed by punishment in both conflict procedures. By contrast, in the elevated plus-maze test, the NK(2) receptor antagonist (3 mg/kg, IP) elicited positive effects on traditional and ethologically derived measures of anxiety. In the mouse defense test battery, SR48968 (0.03-1 mg/kg, IP) decreased flight reactions, risk assessment behavior, defensive biting and escape attempts. While the magnitude of the effects on flight, risk assessment and escape attempts of the NK(2) receptor antagonist was less than that of diazepam, SR48968 appeared to be as effective as the BZ on defensive biting. In rats previously exposed to a cat, SR48968 (3 mg/kg, IP), antalarmin (1 mg/kg, IP), imipramine (30 mg/kg, IP), but not diazepam, reduced subsequent high levels of avoidance responses when subjects are exposed to a cat odor-saturated cue 1 h later. Similar effects of SR48968 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg, IP) were observed in mice following repeated administration (twice a day/5 days/IP). Importantly, the positive effects of the NK(2) receptor antagonist were evident at doses that did not impair general activity, unlike imipramine which displayed mainly sedative action. Moreover, the (R)-enantiomer of SR48968, SR48965, which was tested in the elevated plus-maze, the mouse defense test battery and the cat exposure tests, was much less active than its racemate, indicating a stereoselective action of SR48968. CONCLUSION: These data show that while SR48968 has limited or no efficacy in models or behavioral measures mainly sensitive to BZs, it shows good activity in reducing anxiety-like behaviors following traumatic stress or upon forced and unavoidable contact with a threatening stimulus. This suggests that NK(2) receptor antagonists may have a potential in the treatment of some forms of anxiety disorders.

Adjustment of permissible exposure values to unusual work schedules.

Research activities sought development of a method to adjust exposure limits for 694 substances for unusual work schedules. A consensus was established on the basic toxicological principle for adjustment; criteria for adjustment were selected by a panel of scientists coordinated by a committee of international experts and supported by toxicokinetic modeling; and a group of toxicologists attributed primary health effects and related adjustment category to each substance. A consensus among scientists and employers' and workers' representatives was established on the protocol of the application, in the field, of the adjusted exposure limits. The guiding toxicological principle for adjusting exposure standards to unusual work schedules is to guarantee an equivalent degree of protection for workers with unusual schedules as for workers with a conventional schedule of 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. The process of the adjustment is inspired from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration logic for attribution of primary health effects and adjustment categories ranging from no adjustment to daily or weekly adjustments. The adjusted exposure limits are calculated according to Haber's rule. Decisions on attribution of adjustment categories for the following toxicological effects were reached: respiratory sensitizers (asthma); skin sensitizers; tissue irritants versus tissue toxicants; methemoglobinenia-causing agents; cholinesterase inhibitors; and reproductive system toxicants and teratogens. A simple procedure is presented to facilitate the calculation, application, and interpretation of the adjusted exposure limits.

The preclinical pharmacologic profile of tiapride.

Tiapride is a benzamide derivative that has been used successfully in the clinic for a number of years for the treatment of agitation and aggressiveness in elderly patients. Like many substituted benzamides, tiapride specifically blocks dopamine receptors in the brain. It has affinity for dopamine D(2) (IC(50) = 110-320 nM) and D(3) (IC(50) = 180 nM) receptors in vitro but lacks affinity for dopamine D(1) and D(4) receptors and for non-dopaminergic receptors including H(1), alpha(1), alpha(2)-adrenergic and serotonergic receptors. Tiapride also shows dose-related inhibition of [3H]-raclopride binding in limbic areas and in the striatum of the rat in vivo (ED(50) approximately 20 mg/kg, ip). In microdialysis experiments, tiapride (over the range 10-30 mg/kg, ip) increased extracellular levels of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and striatum, a reflection of its blockade of postsynaptic dopamine receptors in these brain areas. In behavioral experiments in rats, lower doses of tiapride (ED(50) = 10 mg/kg, ip) antagonised dopamine agonist-induced hyperactivity while higher doses (ED(50) = 60 mg/kg, ip) were required to block stereotyped movements. In addition, doses of tiapride up to 200 mg/kg, ip failed to induce catalepsy, an effect observed with many other drugs which block dopamine receptors. In tests of conditioned behavior in rats, tiapride was found to give rise to an interoceptive stimulus associated with dopamine receptor blockade at doses (ED(50) = 2.2 mg/kg, ip) much lower than those producing motor disturbances or sedation (ED(50) = 40 mg/kg, ip), in striking contrast to a range of conventional or atypical neuroleptics that produced interoceptive stimulus and sedation at similar doses. Furthermore, the acquisition by rats of a place-learning task in a water maze was not affected by tiapride (over the range 3-30 mg/kg, ip), whereas haloperidol (MED = 0.25 mg/kg, ip) and risperidone (MED = 0.03 mg/kg, ip) impaired performance. The preclinical pharmacologic and behavioral profile of tiapride suggests that its clinical activity may be due to a selective blockade of dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors in limbic brain regions. The results are also consistent with a lack of motor or cognitive side effects.

SL651498: an anxioselective compound with functional selectivity for alpha2- and alpha3-containing gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptors.

SL651498 [6-fluoro-9-methyl-2-phenyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl-carbonyl)-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-1-one] is a novel pyridoindole derivative that displays high affinity for rat native GABA(A) receptors containing alpha(1) (K(i) = 6.8 nM) and alpha2 (K(i) = 12.3 nM) subunits, and weaker affinity for alpha5-containing GABA(A) receptors (K(i) = 117 nM). Studies on recombinant rat GABA(A) receptors confirm these data (K(i), alpha1beta2gamma2 = 17, alpha2beta2gamma2 = 73, alpha5beta3gamma2 = 215 nM) and indicate intermediate affinity for the alpha3beta2gamma2 subtype (K(i) = 80 nM). SL651498 behaves as a full agonist at recombinant rat GABA(A) receptors containing alpha2 and alpha3 subunits and as a partial agonist at recombinant GABA(A) receptors expressing alpha1 and alpha5 subunits. SL651498 elicited anxiolytic-like activity similar to that of diazepam [minimal effective dose (MED): 1-10 mg/kg, i.p.] in three conflict models, in the elevated plus-maze, the light/dark test, and the defense test battery in rats and mice. Results from activity tests and electroencephalogram analysis indicated that SL651498 induced muscle weakness, ataxia, or sedation at doses much higher than those producing anxiolytic-like activity (MED > or = 30 mg/kg, i.p.). Repeated treatment for 10 days with SL651498 (30 mg/kg, i.p., b.i.d.) in mice was not associated with the development of tolerance to its anticonvulsant effects or physical dependence. Furthermore, SL651498 was much less active than diazepam in potentiating the depressant effects of ethanol in mice. The "anxioselective" profile of SL651498 points to a major role for GABA(A) alpha2 subtype in regulating anxiety and suggests that selectively targeting GABA(A) receptor subtypes can lead to drugs with increased clinical specificity.

The effects of compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three rat models of anxiety.

Compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists have recently been reported to produce benzodiazepine-like antianxiety effects in mice. To assess the cross-species generality of these findings, the present experiments compared the effects of diazepam (0.625-5 mg/kg) with those of several non-selective (MM-77, 0.03-1 mg/kg and pindobind-5-HT(1A), 0.1-5 mg/kg) and selective (WAY100635, 0.01-10 mg/kg, p-MPPI, 0.01-3 mg/kg and SL88.0338, 0.3-10 mg/kg) 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three well-validated anxiolytic screening tests in rats: punished lever-pressing, punished drinking, and the elevated plus-maze. In the punished lever-pressing conflict test, none of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists modified rates of punished responding, whereas in the punished drinking test, WAY100635 (0.3-1 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (3-10 mg/kg), p-MPPI (1 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg), but not pindobind-5-HT(1A), produced clear anticonflict activity. However, the increase in punished responding with the 5-HT(1A) compounds was smaller than that produced by diazepam, indicating weaker anxiolytic-like activity. In the elevated plus-maze test, WAY100635 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (0.3-10 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.01-3 mg/kg), pindobind-5-HT(1A) (0.1-3 mg/kg), but not p-MPPI, showed anxiolytic-like activity on traditional behavioral indices, increasing the percentage of time spent in open arms and the percentage of open arm entries. As was the case in the punished drinking test, the magnitude of the positive effects of the 5-HT(1A) compounds was generally smaller than that of diazepam. Of the ethological measures recorded in the plus-maze, all compounds markedly decreased risk assessment (i.e. attempts) over the entire dose-range, but only diazepam clearly increased directed exploration (i.e. head-dipping). Although the present results demonstrate that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists elicit anxiolytic-like effects in rats, this action appears to be test-specific and, unlike previous findings in mice, smaller than that observed with benzodiazepines. The data are discussed in relation to the possible relevance of species differences in 5-HT(1A) receptor function and the nature of the anxiety response studied.

Haloperidol-induced catalepsy is absent in dopamine D(2), but maintained in dopamine D(3) receptor knock-out mice.

We have previously found that mice homozygous for the deletion of the dopamine D(2) receptor gene (D(2)(-/-) mice) do not present spontaneous catalepsy when tested in a "bar test". In the present study, we sought to analyse the reactivity of D(2) receptor mutant mice to the cataleptogenic effects of dopamine D(2)-like or D(1)-like receptor antagonists. In parallel, we assessed the cataleptogenic effects of these antagonists in dopamine D(3) receptor mutant mice. D(2)(-/-) mice were totally unresponsive to the cataleptogenic effects of the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist haloperidol (0.125-2 mg/kg i.p.), while D(2)(+/-) mice, at the highest haloperidol doses tested, showed a level of catalepsy about half that of wild-type controls. The degree of haloperidol-induced catalepsy was thus proportional to the level of striatal dopamine D(2) receptor expression (0.50, 0.30 and 0.08 pmol/mg protein as measured at 0.25 nM [3H]spiperone for D(2)(+/+), D(2)(+/-) and D(2)(-/-) mice, respectively). However, D(2)(-/-) and D(2)(+/-) mice were as sensitive as their wild-type counterparts to the cataleptogenic effects of the dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonist R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH 23390: 0.03-0.6 mg/kg s.c.). Striatal dopamine D(1) receptor expression (as measured using [3H]SCH 23390 binding) was not significantly affected by the genotype. The ability of SCH 23390 to induce catalepsy in D(2)(-/-) mice suggests that their resistance to haloperidol-induced catalepsy is due to the absence of dopamine D(2) receptors, and not to the abnormal striatal synaptic plasticity that has been shown by others to occur in these mice. In agreement with the observation that dopamine D(2) and dopamine D(1) receptor expression was essentially identical in D(3)(+/+), D(3)(+/-) and D(3)(-/-) mice, dopamine D(3) receptor homozygous and heterozygous mutant mice, on the whole, did not differ from their controls in the time spent in a cataleptic position following administration of either haloperidol (0.5-2 mg/kg i.p.) or SCH 23390 (0.03-0.6 mg/kg s.c.). Also, dopamine D(3) receptor mutant mice were no more responsive than wild-type controls when co-administered subthreshold doses of haloperidol (0.125 mg/kg) and SCH 23390 (0.03 mg/kg), suggesting that dopamine D(3) receptor knock-out mice are not more sensitive than wild-types to the synergistic effects of concurrent blockade of dopamine D(2) and dopamine D(1) receptors in this model. These results suggest that the dopamine D(2) receptor subtype is necessary for haloperidol to produce catalepsy, and that the dopamine D(3) receptor subtype appears to exert no observable control over the catalepsy produced by dopamine D(2)-like, D(1)-like and the combination of D(1)-like and D(2)-like receptor antagonists.

Differences in anxiety-related behaviours and in sensitivity to diazepam in inbred and outbred strains of mice.

RATIONALE: Natural strain differences exist in mice for behavioural traits such as emotional reactivity. OBJECTIVE: The present experiments compared the behavioural profiles of nine strains of mice (BALB/c, C57BL/6, C3H, CBA, DBA/2, NMRI, NZB, SJL, Swiss) in two models of anxiety after the administration of the benzodiazepine diazepam. METHODS: The tests used were the light/dark choice task and the elevated plus-maze, two well-validated anxiolytic screening tests. RESULTS: In vehicle-treated animals, differences on variables designed to measure anxiety-related behaviours were observed in both tests. In the light/dark test, the strains could be divided into three distinct groups: two non-reactive strains (NZB and SJL), an intermediate-reactive group (C3H, CBA, DBA/2, NMRI, C57BL/6 and Swiss), and one highly reactive strain (BALB/c). In the elevated plus-maze, SJL, NMRI, CBA and, to a lesser extent, C3H strains of mice, consistently showed low levels of anxiety-related behaviours. Intermediate levels were seen in the Swiss and BALB/c strains, and high levels of emotional reactivity were seen in C57BL/6, DBA/2 and NZB. The strain distribution between the light/dark and the elevated plus-maze tests shows similarities and differences, suggesting that each of these experimental procedures represents a different set of behaviours. Marked differences between a number of strains of mice in their sensitivity to the anxiolytic-like action of diazepam were observed in both the light/dark and the elevated plus-maze tests. Mice of the BALB/c, Swiss and, to a lesser extent, CBA and C3H strains were responsive to diazepam in both tests, although in the case of CBA mice, effects may have been contaminated by behavioural suppression. SJL mice were largely unresponsive to the action of the benzodiazepine in both tests, whereas in C57, DBA/2, NMRI and NZB mice, diazepam produced positive effects only in the elevated plus-maze. CONCLUSION: The finding of differential strain distributions both with and without diazepam treatment in the light/dark and the elevated plus-maze tests, indicates that not all strains of mice are suitable for investigating the effects of GABA/BZ receptor ligands. This study may thus provide a useful guide for choosing the best strain of mice for studying the pharmacology of fear-related behaviours.

Decreased locomotor activity after microinjection of dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonists and antagonists into lobule 9/10 of the cerebellum: a D3 receptor mediated effect?

The restricted localization of dopamine (DA) D3 receptors in the rat cerebellum lobule 9/10 appears to provide a method for investigating the in vivo selectivity of dopaminergic compounds for the D3 receptor subtype. Sprague-Dawley rats implanted with a cannula aimed at lobule 9/10 were microinjected with DA receptor ligands and immediately placed into activity chambers to record their spontaneous locomotor activity for short term (0 to 20 min) and delayed (20 to 40 min) effects. The DA D2/D3 receptor agonists quinelorane (0.1 to 2.5 microg) and 7-OH-DPAT (0.1 to 10 microg) decreased locomotor activity in the first 20 min post-microinjection. In contrast, the DAD1, receptor agonist 6-Br-APB (0.1 to 10 microg) did not affect locomotor activity during this time period, but markedly increased locomotion between 20 and 40 min at the highest dose tested. The DA receptor antagonists haloperidol and raclopride (1 to 10 microg) were also found to reduce locomotor activity. Furthermore, quinelorane and 7-OH-DPAT, but not haloperidol, when microinjected into lobules 1/2 or 6/7 (where no DA D3 receptors have been detected) decreased locomotor scores. These results show that both DA receptor agonists and antagonists decrease locomotor activity when microinjected into lobule 9/10 of the cerebellum. Additionally, DA receptor agonists can reduce spontaneous locomotion when microinjected outside of lobule 9/10. This would suggest that, at least for quinelorane and 7-OH-DPAT, the locomotor decreasing effects following microinjection into cerebellar lobule 9/10 may not be mediated by activity at DA D3 receptors, and that this behavioural assay is unlikely to provide a means for studying the in vivo pharmacology of the DA D3 receptor.

The D3 antagonist PNU-99194A potentiates the discriminative cue produced by the D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT.

Based on correlations between potencies of various dopamine D2/D3 agonists to substitute for the 7-OH-DPAT discriminative cue and their in vitro (mitogenesis test) potencies, it has been suggested that the 7-OH-DPAT cue is mediated by activity at the D3 subtype. We sought to verify that the 7-OH-DPAT cue could be blocked by PNU-99194A, a commercially available preferential D3 antagonist. Rats were trained (FR10 two-lever, food-reinforced schedule) to press one lever following 7-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg i.p.) and the other lever following saline. Rats were then tested with various doses of 7-OH-DPAT alone or in combination with PNU-99194A. 7-OH-DPAT (0.003 to 0.3 mg/kg) engendered dose-dependent substitution; PNU-99194A (1 to 10 mg/kg) failed to antagonize the cue induced by 0.1 mg/kg of 7-OH-DPAT and, at 10 mg/kg, given in combination with 0.003 to 0.1 mg/kg of 7-OH-DPAT, PNU-99194A markedly shifted the 7-OH-DPAT dose-effect curve to the left, i.e., potentiated the 7-OH-DPAT cue. If PNU-99194A is a preferential D3 antagonist, the present data do not confirm the previous hypothesis that the 7-OH-DPAT cue is mediated by the D3 subtype.

Reduction of oral ethanol self-administration in rats by monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Evidence for a role of dopamine and serotonin in the control of ethanol intake in animals suggests that monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, which increase the synaptic availability of serotonin and dopamine by blocking their metabolism, might have efficacy in the treatment of alcohol dependence. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to evaluate several MAO inhibitors for their capacity to affect ethanol self-administration in rats trained to self-administer ethanol (10% v/v) orally in a free-choice two-lever operant task. The nonselective and irreversible MAO inhibitors, phenelzine (3-10 mg/kg), tranylcypromine (1-3 mg/kg), and nialamide (30 mg/kg), decreased rates of responding maintained by ethanol reinforcement. The reversible MAO-A inhibitor, befloxatone (0.3-3 mg/kg), and the irreversible MAO-A inhibitor, clorgyline (10-30 mg/kg), also reduced ethanol self-administration. However, befloxatone-induced effects leveled off at a 50% decrease. The irreversible MAO-B inhibitors, pargyline (30 mg/kg) and l-deprenyl (3-10 mg/kg) also decreased responding maintained by ethanol reinforcement; these results are consistent with previous findings that both drugs decreased ethanol intake in mice. In conclusion, the present results showing that several MAO inhibitors decreased ethanol self-administration in rats are consistent with previous findings that synaptic levels of serotonin and dopamine play a critical role in the control of ethanol self-administration.