Volume reduction surgery in the native lung after single lung transplantation for emphysema.

The natural history of emphysema suggests that progression of disease in the native lung may contribute to late deterioration in respiratory function after single lung transplantation. In this report, we describe our experience with unilateral volume reduction surgery in three single lung transplant recipients with emphysema. Each patient had had a late decline in lung function with a recurrence of symptoms. Chest radiographs demonstrated hyperinflation of the native lungs with encroachment on the grafts. Serial pulmonary function testing documented progressive reduction in expiratory flows with increases in residual volumes. Exercise testing confirmed severe intolerance to maximal exercise. Unilateral volume reduction surgery was undertaken at 36, 39, and 55 months after transplantation without incident. Radiographs obtained after the procedures demonstrated restoration of normal diaphragmatic contour, decreased aeration of the native lungs, and improved inflation of the allografts. Exercise testing at 3 months documented a mean improvement in maximal oxygen consumption of 35%. Expiratory flows improved by a mean of 60%. Quantitative ventilation and perfusion scans, however, were essentially unchanged. This experience suggests that unilateral volume reduction surgery may be considered as an alternative strategy in single lung transplant recipients with emphysema who exhibit clinically significant functional deterioration. Differentiation of the adverse effects of hyperinflation of the native lung from other potential causes of late deterioration might not be necessary but may be predictive of the degree of functional improvement after volume reduction. The relief of thoracic overdistention seems to play a primary role in the improvement pulmonary function.

Techniques for bronchial anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques have been described to optimize the construction of the bronchial anastomosis in lung transplantation. Over the past 60 months we have performed 86 bronchial anastomoses in 70 patients receiving single lung or bilateral single lung transplants. METHODS: No anastomosis was wrapped and no attempt was made at revascularization of bronchial arteries. A continuous nonabsorbable suturing technique was used in all cases. Standard triple-drug immunotherapy with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone (starting at day 7) was used for each patient. RESULTS: There were no anastomotic leaks, and seven stenoses were identified in five patients (7%). All complications were managed conservatively with stenting, and there were no related deaths. Mean time to stent placement was 109 days. One patient had bilateral stents placed prophylactically during an episode of severe infection for questionable anastomotic viability but without evidence of airway necrosis or obstruction. This patient died of infection at 16 days. Another patient died with stents in place at 71 days. In the four remaining patients, all stents have been removed after a mean of 310 days. These patients were followed up with serial bronchoscopy and were without evidence of recurrent obstruction at 2, 34, 35, and 36 months. Six of seven stenoses occurred in patients with cystic fibrosis. In each patient where stenosis developed the anastomosis was telescoped. Since abandoning the telescoping technique in the remaining 50 anastomoses (14 in patients with cystic fibrosis), no dehiscence or stenosis was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that elaborate techniques aimed at construction of the bronchial anastomosis are not necessary. Moreover, attempts at telescoping may be detrimental. Patients with cystic fibrosis may be a population at higher risk for anastomotic complications. Airway complications can be managed conservatively with good results and little risk to the patient.