Hepatitis B reactivation during cancer chemotherapy: an international survey of the membership of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) can be a serious complication of cancer chemotherapy. However, underutilization of HBV screening and secondary underutilization of antiviral prophylaxis have been frequently reported. The authors electronically distributed a 30-point questionnaire to members of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases to capture experiences with HBVr during cancer chemotherapy. The questionnaire specified diagnostic criteria and collected information on HBV screening, antiviral prophylaxis and clinical outcomes. Ninety-nine respondents reported 188 patients who met the criteria for HBV reactivation. Forty-one practised outside the United States, and most were hepatologists (n = 71) or gastroenterologists (n = 12). One hundred and twenty-six patients had haematologic malignancies, of which 88 (70%) had lymphoma. Seventy-five patients (40%) had screening for both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), and an additional 24 patients (13%) had HBsAg screening alone. Prophylactic antiviral therapy was reported in only 18 patients (10%). Chemotherapy was interrupted in 52 patients (41%) with haematologic malignancies and 26 of 41 patients (63%) with solid tumours (P = 0.01). Rituximab-treated patients (n = 66) required hospitalization more frequently (P = 0.04), but their overall survival did not differ from individuals not treated with rituximab. Death due to liver failure was reported in 43 patients overall (23%). Underutilization of prophylactic antiviral therapy occured in a substantial number of patients who were found to be HBV infected prior to the initiation of cancer chemotherapy. The reasons for this need further exploration because reactivation results in serious yet preventable outcomes.

Clinical utility of viral load measurements in individuals with chronic hepatitis C infection on antiviral therapy.

SUMMARY: Both absolute viral load and log decline in viral load from baseline were found clinically useful in predicting sustained virological response and lack of sustained virological response (non-sustained virological response, NSVR) to treatment. We assessed the clinical utility of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantitation and changes in viral load using the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 Assay (bDNA) in 351 HCV-infected individuals treated with interferon plus ribavirin. We show that viral load decision thresholds provided negative predictive values (NPVs) of >95% at week 4 using a 100 000 IU/mL cut-off and at weeks 8 and 12 using 10 000 IU/mL cut-offs. A 2-log decline from baseline provided NPVs >95% at weeks 8 and 12. Combinations of absolute viral loads and changes in viral load from baseline did not enhance the performance of the decision rules for predicting NSVR. The positive predictive values (PPVs) at weeks 8 and 12 were 59.1 and 67.3%. This study highlights the critical importance of viral quantitation in gauging therapeutic response in patients with chronic HCV infection on antiviral therapy. Early changes in viral load, measured as absolute viral loads or change in viral load from baseline, are highly predictive of NSVR at 8 and 12 weeks. PPVs are modest but these data may provide encouragement to patients who are in the early phases of treatment when side effects are frequent. Additionally, we demonstrated the need for cautious interpretation of stopping rules when the values are at or near the decision thresholds.

Metformin in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot open label trial.

BACKGROUND: Insulin sensitizing agents may be useful in treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. AIM: A pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. METHODS: In an open labelled study, patients with histologically confirmed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease were given metformin (20 mg/kg) for 1 year. Insulin resistance (by log homeostasis assessment model analysis for insulin resistance and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index) and post-treatment hepatic histology were compared with pre-treatment histology. RESULTS: Fifteen patients completed 1 year of treatment. During the initial 3 months, there was improvement in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (P-value 0.01 and 0.02, respectively) along with improvement in insulin sensitivity. However, after 3 months, there was no further improvement in insulin sensitivity and there was gradual rise in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase back to pre-treatment levels. Among the 10 patients with post-treatment biopsy, three (33%), showed improvement in steatosis, two (20%) showed improvement in inflammation score and one (10%) showed improvement in fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Metformin treatment was associated with only a transient improvement in liver chemistries. A progressive, sustainable reduction in insulin sensitivity was not noted during treatment.

Comparison of quality of life, work productivity and medical resource utilization of peginterferon alpha 2a vs the combination of interferon alpha 2b plus ribavirin as initial treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

The on-treatment impact of interferon-based therapies on quality of life (QOL), work productivity, and medical resource utilization has not been systematically studied. We evaluated the effects of treatment with peginterferon alpha (pegIFNalpha) 2a monotherapy and the combination of interferon alpha (IFNalpha) 2b plus ribavirin (RBV) on health-related QOL, work productivity and resource utilization. A total of 412 patients with hepatitis C infection were randomized to open-label treatment with either pegIFNalpha 2a (n = 206) or IFNalpha 2b/RBV (n = 206). PegIFNalpha 2a was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 180 microg once weekly for 48 weeks; and IFNalpha 2b/RBV at doses of 3 MU thrice weekly subcutaneously and 1000-1200 mg/day orally. Outcome measures included the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire and additional generic and specific scales. During treatment, for all SF-36 summary and Hepatitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (HQLQ)-specific scales, the pegIFNalpha 2a group experienced less impairment than did the IFNalpha 2b/RBV patients. The between-treatment differences were significant for many of the scores particularly in the first 24 weeks of treatment. Across all measures of work functioning and productivity at each visit, patients randomized to pegIFNalpha 2a treatment showed less impairment relative to the group treated with IFNalpha 2b/RBV. Hence treatment with pegIFNalpha 2a relative to IFNalpha 2b/RBV minimizes the adverse impact of therapy on health-related QOL. Patients randomized to pegIFNalpha 2a had improved work productivity, less activity impairment, decreased need for prescription drugs to treat adverse effects, and better adherence to therapy.

Transcription-mediated amplification is more sensitive than conventional PCR-based assays for detecting residual serum HCV RNA at end of treatment.

OBJECTIVE: In patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) undergoing antiviral therapy, sustained virologic response is suggested by viral clearance by end of treatment (EOT). Viral clearance is defined by nondetection of serum HCV RNA, usually by qualitative PCR-based assays with limits of detection ranging from 100 to 1000 copies/ml. However, some individuals relapse after achieving apparent viral clearance by EOT. These individuals may have low levels of viremia not detected by current PCR methods. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether the Bayer HCV RNA Qualitative Assay, which employs Transcription Mediated Amplification (TMA) and detects 50 HCV RNA copies/ml, could detect residual serum HCV RNA in patients who achieved apparent viral clearance by EOT and subsequently relapsed. METHODS: Samples were obtained at EOT (wk 24 or 48) and follow-up (wk 24-26 posttreatment) from 97 patients treated for HCV (78 relapsing patients, 19 sustained responders). All samples in which HCV RNA was not detected by PCR were tested in a blinded manner for HCV RNA by the TMA-based assay. RESULTS: HCV RNA was detected by the TMA-based assay in 27 (34.6%) EOT and 76 (97.4%) follow-up samples from relapsing patients, but not in any of the EOT or follow-up samples from sustained responders. CONCLUSION: Residual serum HCV RNA was detected by the TMA-based assay in EOT samples from 34.6% of patients that had achieved apparent viral clearance by PCR. The detection of HCV RNA by the TMA-based assay could help redefine EOT response and assist in the antiviral management of HCV infection.

Serum alanine aminotransferase flares during interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis B: is sustained clearance of HBV DNA dependent on levels of pretreatment viremia?

During interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis B, an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare may herald a sustained loss of viral replication, but the relationship between virologic response, the extent of a flare, and pretreatment hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level has not been defined. We retrospectively examined the impact of an ALT flare on sustained virologic response in 121 interferon-treated patients and 42 untreated controls with either low-level (<100 pg/mL) or high-level (> or =100 pg/mL) viremia. The degree of ALT flare was classified as mild (increase in ALT of 86-171 IU/L above baseline), moderate (increase of 172 to 343 IU/L above baseline), and severe (increase of > or =344 IU/L above baseline). Undetectable serum HBV DNA and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss were significantly more likely at the end of follow-up in patients having a flare (P =.0001 and.001, respectively). In the high viremia group, a proportionate increase in virologic response was observed as the degree of flare increased. By multivariate analysis, high baseline HBV DNA, high pretreatment ALT, and both moderate and severe ALT flare were independently predictive of a virologic response with severe flare being the most powerful predictor for a sustained loss of serum HBV DNA (odds ratio, 5.3; P =.004). Severe flare was predictive of a virologic response in the high but not low viremia group. We conclude that a virologic response in patients with high-level viremia is dependent on the degree of ALT flare. Induction of a robust flare may enhance virologic response when high-level viremia is detected.

Acute flares in chronic hepatitis B: the natural and unnatural history of an immunologically mediated liver disease.

Acute flares in chronic hepatitis B are common and may be caused by a number of identifiable and potentially treatable factors. The common link for many of these exacerbation episodes is a change in the immunologic response to hepatitis B virus (HBV), and this may have no identifiable cause or be triggered by an increase in viral replication or genotypic change. It is important to keep in mind the clinical situations in which patients are at increased risk of reactivated infection and secondary exacerbations. Reactivation is frequently induced by medical treatments such as cancer chemotherapy, antirejection drugs used in organ transplantation, and corticosteroids. The immunologic flares that often result from sudden withdrawal of these medications can be life-threatening unless recognized and treated promptly with antivirals, and there is increasing experience that preemptive antiviral treatment can diminish their occurrence and improve the outcome. The experience with lamivudine and other nucleoside analogues has increased our understanding of the molecular events behind hepatitis flares that occur when chronic hepatitis B is treated with drugs that potently inhibit HBV DNA polymerase. However, not all flares are explainable by events related to HBV infection alone. Depending on the population studied, as many as 20%-30% of flares may be caused by infection with other hepatotropic viruses, and this situation may inhibit HBV replication. Proper understanding of the etiology and effective treatment of acute flares in chronic hepatitis B requires an appreciation of high-risk clinical situations, assessment of HBV replication status, and testing for other viruses when appropriate.

A multicenter United States-Canadian trial to assess lamivudine monotherapy before and after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B.

Seventy-seven liver transplant candidates were enrolled in a multicenter study in which patients were treated with lamivudine (100 mg daily) without the adjunctive use of hepatitis B immune globulin. Treatment was begun while patients awaited liver transplantation and continued after transplantation. All were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, and 61% had detectable hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA when treatment was begun. Forty-seven underwent liver transplantation and 30 did not. Median study participation was 38 months (range, 2.7-48.5) in the transplanted patients and 26 months (range, 0.1-37) in the nontransplanted group. Twenty-five of 42 (60%) transplanted patients with 12 or more weeks of posttransplantation follow-up were HBsAg negative at the last study visit. At treatment week 156, 13 of 22 (59%) remained HBsAg negative, and all 9 reinfected patients were HBV-DNA positive before treatment. In the nontransplanted patients, HBeAg was initially detectable in 20 of 27 (74%) but this decreased to 3 of 17 (18%) after 104 weeks of treatment, and significant improvement in biochemical parameters was observed. HBV-DNA polymerase mutants were detected in 15 (21%) and 6 (20%) of the transplanted and nontransplanted patients, respectively. When compared with historical cohorts, lamivudine-treated patients appeared to have improved survival, and transplanted patients had a decrease in the rate of recurrent HBV infection. Lamivudine therapy was partially effective in preventing recurrent HBV infection when given before and after transplantation. Thus, future trials using a combination of HBIg and lamivudine are needed to assess the optimal prophylactic therapy.

Long-term mortality and morbidity of transfusion-associated non-A, non-B, and type C hepatitis: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute collaborative study.

Persons with non-A, non-B hepatitis (cases) identified in 5 transfusion studies in the early 1970s have been followed ever since and compared for outcome with matched, transfused, non-hepatitis controls from the same studies. Previously, we reported no difference in all-cause mortality but slightly increased liver-related mortality between these cohorts after 18 years follow-up. We now present mortality and morbidity data after approximately 25 years of follow-up, restricted to the 3 studies with archived original sera. All-cause mortality was 67% among 222 hepatitis C-related cases and 65% among 377 controls (P = NS). Liver-related mortality was 4.1% and 1.3%, respectively (P =.05). Of 129 living persons with previously diagnosed transfusion-associated hepatitis (TAH), 90 (70%) had proven TAH-C, and 39 (30%), non-A-G hepatitis. Follow-up of the 90 TAH-C cases revealed viremia with chronic hepatitis in 38%, viremia without chronic hepatitis in 39%, anti-HCV without viremia in 17%, and no residual HCV markers in 7%. Thirty-five percent of 20 TAH-C patients biopsied for biochemically defined chronic hepatitis displayed cirrhosis, representing 17% of all those originally HCV-infected. Clinically evident liver disease was observed in 86% with cirrhosis but in only 23% with chronic hepatitis alone. Thirty percent of non-A, non-B hepatitis cases were unrelated to hepatitis viruses A,B,C, and G, suggesting another unidentified agent. In conclusion, all-cause mortality approximately 25 years after acute TAH-C is high but is no different between cases and controls. Liver-related mortality attributable to chronic hepatitis C, though low (<3%), is significantly higher among the cases. Among living patients originally HCV-infected, 23% have spontaneously lost HCV RNA.

Transplantation of livers from hbc Ab positive donors into HBc Ab negative recipients: a strategy and preliminary results.

Here we describe a strategy for using livers from hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive donors in anti-HBc negative recipients and report our preliminary results. Adult anti-HBc negative recipients were immunized against hepatitis B virus (HBV) prior to transplantation. Liver biopsies from anti-HBc positive, HBs Ag negative donors were performed at the time of procurement to rule out acute hepatitis or chronic liver disease. Donor serum and liver samples were collected for HBV DNA analysis by PCR. Recipients were given HBIG (10000 units, i.v.) during the anhepatic phase of transplantation. Patients were treated with lamivudine (150 mg) beginning on postoperative day (POD) 1. If HBV DNA was not detected in either donor liver or serum by PCR, recipient antiviral therapy was stopped. If donor liver and serum were positive for HBV DNA by PCR, the recipient was maintained on combination lamivudine and HBIG therapy. If HBV DNA was detected in donor liver but not in donor serum, the patient was managed on lamivudine therapy alone. Between February 1999 and June 2000, six anti-HBc negative recipients received liver transplants from anti-HBc positive donors. PCR analysis of serum from the six donors was negative for HBV DNA in each, while donor liver PCR analysis was positive in five of six for HBV DNA. Accordingly, all patients were given HBIG in the anhepatic phase of transplantation and five of six were maintained on daily lamivudine therapy. Follow-up periods have ranged from 2 to 18 months. There has been no emergence of de novo hepatitis B. Serial serum HBs Ag and HBV DNA assays have all proven negative. Moreover, while on lamivudine therapy, 2 patients now have undetectable HBV DNA in hepatic allograft biopsies by PCR analysis. Our strategy for using livers from anti-HBc donors has yielded promising initial results. De novo hepatitis B has not occurred and our data suggest residual hepatitis B virus may be eradicated in recipients maintained on lamivudine therapy.

Challenges and opportunities for medical education and clinical research in a changing healthcare environment.

The current economic crisis in medicine has led to a restructuring of the way in which physicians utilize their time. Considerably more time is being spent on clinical services and less on teaching and clinical research. Multiple opportunities exist, however, for mentoring and clinical research in the current system. Academic behaviors can be integrated into the daily clinical experience. Scientific methodology can be used to address important questions that pertain to a large segment of their practice and, by so doing, lead to improved means of delivering healthcare and a reduction in healthcare expenditures. The inclusion of residents into such clinical research programs is to be encouraged. Should physicians continue to pay less and less attention to the maintenance of their professional diversity, future generations of physicians will be the recipients of a more dilute system of medical education.

Antiviral therapy to prevent and treat hepatitis B virus infection in hepatic allografts.

Hepatitis B infection of a liver allograft can have serious consequences including a negative influence on the probability of survival. Therefore, there is a need for very effective antiviral therapy for transplant recipients. In this article the early experience with nucleoside analogue antiviral agents, both to prevent and to treat hepatitis B in liver allografts, is reviewed. There are several important characteristics of these agents that are already apparent. Ganciclovir and famciclovir have limited efficacy in treating infections when they are used alone. These compounds might be beneficial if used after resistance develops to other drugs or when used in combination with other agents. Lamivudine is effective for about two-thirds of patients in preventing and treating hepatitis B infection in allografts. Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) is known to increase the efficacy of lamivudine in preventing infection. A large study to further characterize this combination therapy is being organized. Resistance to famciclovir and lamivudine can occur if they are used alone for a long time. In order to lower the incidence of drug resistance, it may be necessary to utilize combinations of nucleoside analogues.

Posttransplantation: emerging and future therapies.

Liver transplantation in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) commonly results in reinfection that, if untreated, often compromises the viability of the allograft and negatively influences survival. Posttransplant treatment with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is now the standard of care, but patients appear to require lifelong treatment to prevent reinfection. In the past several years, new management strategies in patients with HBV have been developed, with an aim to decrease HBV-DNA replication before transplantation. Such an approach should increase the success of transplantation by decreasing the risk of reinfection and thus preventing recurrent disease posttransplantation. Nucleoside analogues, either alone or in conjunction with HBIG, are currently in use and are being studied in clinical trials as a means of preventing viral recurrence. Ganciclovir, famciclovir, and lamivudine all have demonstrated efficacy, although they vary in terms of effectiveness. Resistance may develop with the use of these agents and leads to reinfection by the mutant virus. Combination therapy may minimize the risk of viral mutation. Research continues to search for more effective ways to prevent and, if necessary, treat viral recurrence in patients undergoing liver transplantation for HBV.

Case studies of the hepatitis B patient: a panel discussion.

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the treatment of patients with hepatitis B who are candidates for liver transplantation. This includes the prevention and management of hepatitis B posttransplantation. However, there is no established protocol for treating these patients. Ultimately, the goal would be to have patients HBV-DNA negative pretransplantation and then to prevent HBV recurrence posttransplantation to help ensure their quality of life. Several clinical case scenarios are presented and possible treatment solutions have been suggested. The timing of a transplant is critical due to the risk of viral mutation while the patient is on a nucleoside analogue antiviral agent and waiting for an organ. One successful option might be to start therapy pretransplant and continue it posttransplant. Combination therapy appears to provide the most effective course of treatment. This should include a nucleoside analogue and patients should be covered with hepatitis B immune globulin throughout the course of therapy. Several other variations of combination therapy are discussed, but many clinical issues remain to be resolved. Guidelines for future studies designed to answer these questions are proposed.

Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B mutants.

Lamivudine has been shown to be an effective therapy for chronic hepatitis B, but resistance to this nucleoside agent is common after prolonged use. Five patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection developed resistance to lamivudine after 9 to 19 months of treatment. In 4 patients this occurred after liver transplantation and the remaining individual had stable cirrhosis. In each case, resistance was confirmed to be caused by one or more mutations in the HBV-DNA polymerase gene and was associated with active underlying liver disease. The patients were treated with adefovir dipivoxil in a dose of 5 to 30 mg daily. Two to 4 log(10) reductions in HBV-DNA levels were observed in 4 cases, and the fifth patient became negative by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after retransplantation in conjunction with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg). Virologic improvement was associated with stable or declining serum alanine transaminase levels in 4 patients. HBV-DNA suppression has been sustained during a mean treatment period of 13 months (range 11 to 15 months), including 1 patient in whom lamivudine has been discontinued. Mild changes in renal function were observed during treatment in most cases but did not require early discontinuation of the drug. This study provides evidence that adefovir dipivoxil can be an effective treatment for lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants as well as wild-type HBV.

Interferon and ribavirin versus interferon and amantadine in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the potential efficacy and safety of a combination of interferon and ribavirin with that of interferon and amantadine in patients who had previously failed to respond to interferon monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 29 patients were randomized to 3 million units of alpha-interferon three times weekly with 1000 mg of ribavirin daily (group A, n = 14) or an identical dose of alpha-interferon and amantadine hydrochloride given in a dose of 200 mg daily (group B, n = 15). Patients were treated for 24 wk and observed for 24 wk posttreatment. RESULTS: The treatment groups were evenly matched with respect to gender, frequency of genotype 1, presence of fibrosis, as well as baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HCV RNA levels. At the end of therapy, five of 14 or 36% of patients in group A versus 0 of 15 in group B had both normal serum ALT and nondetectable HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (p = 0.017). A complete response was sustained, however, in only two of 13 patients (15%) in group A who completed 24 wk of observation posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of interferon nonresponders have an end-of-treatment biochemical and virological response to a combination of interferon and ribavirin, and sustained responses are possible. The addition of amantadine to interferon, in contrast, does not seem to enhance the antiviral effectiveness of interferon in patients who have previously failed to respond.