Clinical, Sonographic, and Hysteroscopic Features of Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosed after Hysterectomy in Patients with a Preoperative Diagnosis of Atypical Hyperplasia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) is a precancerous condition implying a high risk of concurrent endometrial cancer (EC), which might be occult and only diagnosed at postoperative histopathological examination after hysterectomy. Our study aimed to investigate potential differences in preoperative clinical, sonographic, and hysteroscopic characteristics in patients with AEH and postoperative diagnosis of EC. METHODS: a retrospective single-center study was carried out on a case series of 80 women with AEH undergoing diagnostic workup, including ultrasonography and hysteroscopy, with subsequent hysterectomy. Women with AEH confirmed at the histopathological examination were compared with patients with a postoperative diagnosis of EC. RESULTS: in our population, EC was diagnosed in 53 women, whereas the preoperative diagnosis of AEH was confirmed in 27 cases. At ultrasonography, women with occult EC showed greater endometrial thickness (20.3 mm vs. 10.3 mm, p 0.001) and size of the endocavitary lesion (maximum diameter 25.2 mm vs. 10.6 mm, p 0.001), and a higher prevalence of irregular endometrial-myometrial junction (40.5% vs. 6.7%, p 0.022) and endouterine vascularization at color Doppler (64.2% vs. 34.6%, p 0.017). At hysteroscopy, patients with occult EC showed a higher prevalence of necrosis (44.2% vs. 4.2%, p 0.001) and atypical vessels (70.6% vs. 33.3%, p 0.003), whereas true AEH mainly presented as a protruding intracavitary lesion (77.8% vs. 50.9%, p 0.029). In EC, subjective assessment by the operator was more frequently indicative of cancer (80.0% vs. 12.5%). No difference was found for clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: occult EC in AEH may exhibit some differences in ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic patterns of presentation compared with real AEH, which could prompt a more significant suspect for the possible presence of concurrent EC at preoperative diagnostic workup.

Could a 2D/3D US based model be helpful in the assessment of myometrial invasion at time of intraoperative frozen section? A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of myometrial invasion is a pivotal step in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer. Intraoperative frozen section (FS) represents a reliable tool in directing surgeon's choices. Preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (US) showed high accuracy in evaluating myometrial invasion. This study aimed to understand if the application of a standardized ultrasonographic protocol for the pre-operative evaluation of myometrial invasion can help pathologists in improving the accuracy of FS. Furthermore, the agreement between US and FS in the assessment of myometrial invasion was assessed. METHODS: Sixty-six patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer were analyzed. Preoperative 2D/3D ultrasound was performed in all the patients. Myometrial invasion was estimated by subjective assessment and objective measurement techniques. Data from US were reported to pathologists through a prefilled form with depth and site of the maximum myometrial invasion. Diagnostic performance of US and FS were compared having the definitive histological examination as the gold standard. RESULTS: Influenced by the information given by our 3D US-model, FS showed a 90% sensitivity and a 93% specificity, with a 93% PPV and an 89% NPV. The agreement with histology was strong (K=0.824). Myometrial invasion was missed at the level of the isthmus by FS just in one case. Subjective assessment was confirmed as the most reliable ultrasonographic technique in assessing myometrial invasion, with 90% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 80% PPV and 89% NPV. The agreement with histology was substantial (K=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: The application of a preoperative 2D/3D US assessment would seem to help pathologists in detecting myometrial invasion in difficult areas of the uterus such as the isthmus, reducing downstaging and overtreatment.

Suspecting malignancy in endometrial polyps: value of hysteroscopy.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopic polypectomy is the gold standard to treat endometrial polyps and obtain specimens for histological evaluation. There is continuing debate as to when to offer hysteroscopic polypectomy, especially in asymptomatic women with incidental lesions. The aims of this study were to assess the accuracy of hysteroscopy and Vabra sampling in diagnosing atypical hyperplasia and cancer growing on the surface of endometrial polyps and to investigate the association between atypical endometrial polyps and some potential clinical risk factors. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. We assessed 1039 hysteroscopies and we identified 345 women with endometrial polyps. All patients with endometrial polyps underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy. Data about age, menopausal status, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), hormone replacement therapy and tamoxifen use were collected. Hysteroscopic, histological and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer growing on the surface of endometrial polyps was significantly low (1.7%). Hysteroscopy correctly excluded (negative predictive value: 100%) and accurately predicted (positive predictive value: 85.7%) preneoplastic or neoplastic lesions growing within the epithelial layer of endometrial polyps. Vabra sampling was inadequate for the histological diagnosis in 38.5% of cases. Age over 60 years and postmenopausal AUB were associated with an 8.3-fold ( P = 0.022) and 8.8-fold (P = 0.020) increased risk, respectively, of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions growing on the surface of endometrial polyps. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a good tool to predict malignancy of the epithelial layer of endometrial polyps. Age over 60 years and AUB are associated with an increased risk of malignant polyps. Few suspicious endometrial polyps should undergo surgical resection.