The impact of co-occurring mental health problems on referral to and initiation of treatment among youth under probation supervision: Findings from a cluster randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Many youth under community supervision have substance use and co-occurring mental health issues. Yet, access to treatment is limited, and many programs cannot address co-occurring disorders. This study examines how co-occurring symptoms among youth on probation affect referral to and initiation of treatment. We hypothesize that both referral and initiation rates will be lower for youth with any co-occurring indicators. METHODS: This study collected administrative data from 14 sites in three states between March 2014 and November 2017 using JJ-TRIALS, a cluster randomized trial. Among 8552 youth in need of treatment (screened as having a substance use problem, drug possession arrest, positive drug test, etc.), 2069 received a referral to treatment and 1630 initiated treatment among those referred. A co-occurring indicator (n = 2828) was based on symptoms of an internalizing and/or externalizing issue. Descriptive analyses compared referral and initiation by behavioral health status. Two-level mixed effects logistic regression models estimated effects of site-level variables. RESULTS: Among youth in need with co-occurring internal, external, or both indicators, only 16 %, 18 %, and 20 % were referred to treatment and of those referred, 63 %, 69 %, and 57 % initiated treatment, respectively. Comparatively, 27 % and 83 % of youth with a substance use only indicator were referred and initiated treatment respectively. Multi-level multivariate models found that, contrary to our hypothesis, co-occurring-both (p = 0.00, OR 1.44) and co-occurring-internal indicators (p = 0.06, OR 1.25) predicted higher referral but there were no differences in initiation rates. However, there was substantial site-level variation. CONCLUSIONS: Youth on probation in need of substance use treatment with co-occurring issues have low referral rates. Behavioral health status may influence youth referral to treatment depending on where a youth is located. Depending on the site, there may be a lack of community programs that can adequately treat youth with co-occurring issues and reduce unmet service needs.

Augmenting substance use treatment in the drug court: A pilot randomized trial of peer recovery support.

INTRODUCTION: Peer recovery specialist (PRS) support has been used to varying degrees in community substance use and mental health treatment for a number of years. Although there has been some evidence of positive PRS impacts on client outcomes, previous research has shown inconsistent findings and methodological shortcomings. Given the high prevalence of substance use disorders among people involved in the criminal justice system, and limited available treatment opportunities, PRS support could provide a cost-effective opportunity to promote positive client outcomes. Drug courts, with their focus on treatment and rehabilitation rather than punishment, are an ideal laboratory to test the impacts of PRS on substance use recurrence and recidivism. METHODS: The present study is, to our knowledge, the first experimental test of the PRS model in a justice system setting. We implemented a pilot experiment in the Philadelphia Treatment Court, randomizing 76 drug court participants to be linked to a PRS or to services as usual, and analyzed client outcomes over a nine-month follow-up period. Most participants' drug of choice was marijuana. RESULTS: The results showed a reduction in rearrests and improvement in drug court engagement, but no impact on substance use recurrence or treatment engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed findings suggest some promise for the PRS model in the drug court setting, but the need for further research with more diverse and higher-risk drug court populations.