Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Chemother ; 19(6): 694-702, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18230553

ABSTRACT

This report focuses on the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in complicated urinary tract infections in a prospective, open-label, multicenter study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended-release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin XR) 1000 mg once daily for 7-14 days for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. A total of 204 patients were valid for intention-to-treat analysis, of whom 130 were included in the clinical efficacy population. In the 56 microbiologically valid patients the bacteriological eradication rate was 82.1% and the clinical cure rate was 94.6%. Patients with P. aeruginosa infections valid for microbiological efficacy (n = 7) had 100% bacteriological eradication and clinical cure rates. In the intention-to-treat population, the bacteriological and clinical cure rates were 42.1% (51/121) and 55.9% (114/204), respectively. These rates were 58.3% and 75.0% respectively, for patients with P. aeruginosa infections. To achieve the desired 10 patients with P. aeruginosa for analysis, these data were pooled with data from a previous study. Treatment failure correlated with pre-therapy P. aeruginosa isolates being resistant to ciprofloxacin. On exploratory multivariate regression analysis, presence of neurogenic bladder, urinary retention owing to benign prostatic hypertrophy, prior urinary tract infection, and ischemic heart disease predicted P. aeruginosa infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Ciprofloxacin/adverse effects , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Respir Med ; 100(10): 1781-90, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16531032

ABSTRACT

Haemophilus influenzae is the most common bacterial pathogen associated with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). This study determined the rate of bacterial eradication of H. influenzae during AECB treated with either macrolides or moxifloxacin. Adult AECB patients with H. influenzae were included in a pooled analysis of four double-blind, multicentre, randomised trials. Patients received either moxifloxacin (400 mg qd for 5-10 days) or macrolides (azithromycin 500 mg/250 mg qd for 5 days or clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 5-10 days). Bacterial eradication and clinical success were recorded at the test-of-cure visit (7-37 days post-therapy). Of 2555 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 910 were microbiologically valid and 292 (32%) had H. influenzae cultured at baseline. Bacterial eradication of H. influenzae was significantly higher with moxifloxacin vs. macrolide-treated patients (93.0% [133/143] vs. 73.2% [109/149], respectively, P = 0.001). Moxifloxacin also demonstrated higher eradication rates compared with azithromycin (96.8% vs. 84.6%, P = 0.019) and clarithromycin (90.1% vs. 64.2%, P = 0.001) analysed separately. Clinical success was 89.5% (128/143) for moxifloxacin vs. 85.2% (127/149) for the macrolide group (P = 0.278); similar results were found when moxifloxacin was compared individually with each macrolide. For patients with AECB due to H. influenzae, moxifloxacin provided superior bacterial eradication rates than macrolide therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchitis, Chronic/microbiology , Haemophilus Infections/prevention & control , Haemophilus influenzae , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aza Compounds/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Bronchitis, Chronic/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fluoroquinolones , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Moxifloxacin , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 16(1): 97-105; discussion 123-6, 1997 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9002118

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis patients have chronic bacterial infections of the respiratory tract, most commonly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although controversial, administration of antibiotic therapy during acute pulmonary exacerbations is standard practice. Fluoroquinolones are currently not indicated for use in young children because of the observation of arthropathy and damage to growing cartilage in beagle puppies. Because of its activity against P. aeruginosa and excellent oral bioavailability, ciprofloxacin offers a unique therapeutic alternative for this patient population. OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, double blind study compared the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin vs. ceftazidime/tobramycin in hospitalized pediatric cystic fibrosis patients with an acute pulmonary exacerbation associated with P. aeruginosa infection. METHODS: One hundred thirty patients (ages 5 to 17 years) were randomized to receive either i.v. ciprofloxacin 10 mg/kg every 8 h for 7 days followed by oral ciprofloxacin 20 mg/kg every 12 h for a minimum of 3 days or i.v. ceftazidime 50 mg/kg every 8 h plus i.v. tobramycin 3 mg/kg every 8 h for a minimum of 10 days. Clinical, bacteriologic and safety responses were assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: All 84 patients (median age, 11 years; range, 5 to 17 years) valid for efficacy in both treatment groups demonstrated clinical improvement. Five patients experienced clinical relapses (3 ciprofloxacin, 2 ceftazidime/tobramycin) by the 2- to 4-week follow-up. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated similar clinical findings between the two treatment groups at both the end of therapy and follow-up. Clinical improvement correlated with improvement in pulmonary function studies and the acute clinical scoring system but not with bacteriologic eradication of Pseudomonas. DNA profiles demonstrated that irrespective of colony morphology, usually one clonal strain was associated with each patient's pulmonary exacerbation. Treatment-associated musculoskeletal events occurred with equal frequency (22% vs. 21%) in both study drug groups (n = 129), and arthralgias were within the range of rates for cystic fibrosis arthropathy. None of these events required study drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Sequential i.v./oral ciprofloxacin monotherapy offers a safe and efficacious alternative to standard parenteral therapy for acute pulmonary exacerbations in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Arthralgia/chemically induced , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Ciprofloxacin/adverse effects , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Pneumonia, Bacterial/complications , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas Infections/complications , Tobramycin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...