Understanding the Experiences of Family Caregivers of Nursing Home Residents With Dementia: A Grounded Theory Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias progress over time and result in cognitive decline, loss of independence, and behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of dementia that can lead to nursing home placement. Research has focused on examining the effects of nursing home placement on the family caregiver; however, their experiences are less understood. We sought to investigate the experiences and perceptions of family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia. The objective was to create a conceptual model that explains the complex nature of the family caregiver experience. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is part of a larger randomized controlled trial. Following a grounded theory approach, we completed 30 in-depth, one-on-one interviews with family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia. Data analysis followed an iterative process that employed open, axial, and selective coding. RESULTS: Our conceptual model depicts the interrelationship between contributing factors that interrelate and impact family caregiver satisfaction with nursing home care. Six factors contribute to family caregiver satisfaction: family caregiver interactions with nursing home staff; staff management of resident behavioral symptoms; nursing home context; family caregiver knowledge of dementia; family caregiver strain; and the resident experience. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings revealed family caregiver experiences that are unique to the institutional nursing home setting and not reflected in prior work focusing on experiences within community-based settings. Understanding family caregiver experiences and the contributors to how satisfaction in care is perceived, may foster collaboration and teamwork among families and staff.

Providing unloading by exoskeleton improves shoulder flexion performance after stroke.

Robotic devices can be engaged actively or passively to unload arm weight or impose additional loading. The conditions of variable loading and unloading offer an opportunity to investigate motor performance of the arm affected by a stroke. The objective of this study was to investigate the interactive effects of the proximal arm impairment and passive weight compensation on shoulder flexion performance in the sagittal plane after stroke. Twenty-eight participants (age 57 ± 10 years, 21/28 ≤ 6 weeks post-stroke) played a shoulder flexion game under five standardized weight compensation configurations provided by the Armeo®Spring exoskeleton. Percent of targets acquired and root mean square error were calculated to derive three behavioral and three kinematic outcomes: total score/overall error (loading/unloading conditions and five configurations combined), loading and unloading score/error (five configurations combined), and weight compensation configuration score/error for each setting separately. The total score was positively related and the overall error was negatively related to proximal arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer upper extremity movement subscale, maximum 30, FM30). The unloading score (80 ± 27%) and error (5 ± 4°) were significantly better than the loading score (45 ± 38%, p < 0.01) and error (14± 9°, p < 0.01) with improvements most pronounced in the mid-range of FM30 (4-15 points). The configuration scores/error gradually improved with each increment in unloading for the mid-range FM30 participants, while only error improved in those with low FM30. In conclusion, shoulder flexion performance depends on proximal arm impairment, but it is also influenced by the degree of unloading/loading provided, particularly among individuals with moderate paresis after stroke.

The utility of the single-subject method for comparison of temporal-spatial gait changes between a microprocessor and non-microprocessor prosthetic knees.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing knowledge about the potential benefits of advanced user-controlled technology, the decision about switching an individual prosthesis user from a non-microprocessor prosthetic knee to a microprocessor prosthetic knee is mainly based on clinician's experience rather than empirical evidence. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the utility of single-subject design and data analysis for evaluating changes in temporal-spatial gait characteristics between walking with a non-microprocessor prosthetic knee and microprocessor prosthetic knee. STUDY DESIGN: Single-subject ABA/BAB design. METHODS: Seven non-microprocessor prosthetic knee users (all men, age 50-84 years, 3-40 years post-amputation) were transitioned through the ABA or BAB phases (A-NMPK, B-MPK, 5 weeks each). Four weekly gait evaluations were performed at three self-selected speeds with an electronic walkway. The non-microprocessor prosthetic knee-microprocessor prosthetic knee differences in stride length-cadence relationship, prosthetic weight acceptance, single-limb support, and step width were evaluated for each subject using the "non-overlap of all pairs" statistical method. RESULTS: Most subjects improved temporal-spatial gait while on the microprocessor prosthetic knee; in only one subject, none of the 10 gait parameters were in favor of the microprocessor prosthetic knee. In the BAB group, longer use of the microprocessor prosthetic knee was associated with shorter prosthetic weight acceptance and longer single-limb support times across three speeds. Step width either improved with the microprocessor prosthetic knee or remained unchanged in most subjects. CONCLUSION: The evidence of individual subject improvements in gait coordination, greater reliance on the prosthetic side, and better stability with the microprocessor prosthetic knee than non-microprocessor prosthetic knee over a range of walking speeds demonstrate the practical utility of the single-subject method in clinical decision-making. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results demonstrate the use of the single-subject method for examining person-specific differences in temporal-spatial gait characteristics between walking with a non-microprocessor prosthetic knee and microprocessor prosthetic knee at three self-selected speeds. The method proved feasible and reliable for documenting changes in gait at the individual level, which is relevant for clinical practice.

Comparison of mobility and user satisfaction between a microprocessor knee and a standard prosthetic knee: a summary of seven single-subject trials.

Insufficient evidence of the benefits provided by costlier microprocessor knees (MPKs) over nonmicroprocessor knees (NMPKs) often causes concern when considering MPK prescription. Thus, more studies are needed to demonstrate differences between MPKs and NMPKs and define sensitive outcomes to guide MPK prescription. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of switching from NMPK to MPK on measures of mobility and preference. Seven long-term NMPK users (all men, ages 50-84, 3-64 years postamputation) participated in this study, which use a single-subject design (ABA or BAB; A=NMPK, B=MPK). Mobility was assessed with the Amputee Mobility Predictor, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), L-Test, 6-Min Walk Test (6MWT) with Physiological Cost Index, and self-selected normal and very fast gait speeds. The preference between NMPK and MPK was evaluated by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and the visual analog scale. Mobility improved with the MPK in six of seven participants, which was most often captured with BBS (median: +6 points) and 6MWT (median: +63 m). These improvements typically exceeded minimal clinically important difference or minimal detectable change thresholds. Most participants scored the MPK higher on the PEQ (median: +20 points) and six of seven expressed a global preference toward MPK. In the BAB group, the Amputee Mobility Predictor and BBS correlated with perception of change on several PEQ domains (Ρ≥0.59). In conclusion, MPKs may provide better outcomes and user satisfaction, particularly in those with lower mobility function. BBS and 6MWT were found to be the most sensitive measures to capture changes in mobility while using MPK for several weeks.

Increased alertness, better than posture prioritization, explains dual-task performance in prosthesis users and controls under increasing postural and cognitive challenge.

Sensorimotor impairments after limb amputation impose a threat to stability. Commonly described strategies for maintaining stability are the posture first strategy (prioritization of balance) and posture second strategy (prioritization of concurrent tasks). The existence of these strategies was examined in 13 below-knee prosthesis users and 15 controls during dual-task standing under increasing postural and cognitive challenge by evaluating path length, 95% sway area, and anterior-posterior and medial-lateral amplitudes of the center of pressure. The subjects stood on two force platforms under usual (hard surface/eyes open) and difficult (soft surface/eyes closed) conditions, first alone and while performing a cognitive task without and then with instruction on cognitive prioritization. During standing alone, sway was not significantly different between groups. After adding the cognitive task without prioritization instruction, prosthesis users increased sway more under the dual-task than single-task standing (p ≤ 0.028) during both usual and difficult conditions, favoring the posture second strategy. Controls, however, reduced dual-task sway under a greater postural challenge (p ≤ 0.017), suggesting the posture first strategy. With prioritization of the cognitive task, sway was unchanged or reduced in prosthesis users, suggesting departure from the posture second strategy, whereas controls maintained the posture first strategy. Individual analysis of dual tasking revealed that greater postural demand in controls and greater cognitive challenge in prosthesis users led to both reduced sway and improved cognitive performance, suggesting cognitive-motor facilitation. Thus, activation of additional resources through increased alertness, rather than posture prioritization, may explain dual-task performance in both prosthesis users and controls under increasing postural and cognitive challenge.

Weight compensation characteristics of Armeo®Spring exoskeleton: implications for clinical practice and research.

BACKGROUND: Armeo®Spring exoskeleton is widely used for upper extremity rehabilitation; however, weight compensation provided by the device appears insufficiently characterized to fully utilize it in clinical and research settings. METHODS: Weight compensation was quantified by measuring static force in the sagittal plane with a load cell attached to the elbow joint of Armeo®Spring. All upper spring settings were examined in 5° increments at the minimum, maximum, and two intermediate upper and lower module length settings, while keeping the lower spring at minimum. The same measurements were made for minimum upper spring setting and maximum lower spring setting at minimum and maximum module lengths. Weight compensation was plotted against upper module angles, and slope was analyzed for each condition. RESULTS: The Armeo®Spring design prompted defining the slack angle and exoskeleton balance angle, which, depending on spring and length settings, divide the operating range into different unloading and loading regions. Higher spring tensions and shorter module lengths provided greater unloading (≤6.32 kg of support). Weight compensation slope decreased faster with shorter length settings (minimum length = -0.082 ± 0.002 kg/°; maximum length = -0.046 ± 0.001 kg/°) independent of spring settings. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the impact of different settings on the Armeo®Spring weight compensation should help define best clinical practice and improve fidelity of research.