Thorough design and pre-trial quality assurance (QA) decrease dosimetric impact of delineation and dose planning variability in the STRICTLUNG and STARLUNG trials for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of central and ultra-central lung tumours.

INTRODUCTION: SBRT of central lung tumours implies significant risk of toxicity. We are initiating two phase II trials prescribing 56 Gy/eight fractions to PTV, allowing for dose escalation of GTV. We prioritize organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage, making the treatment plans very sensitive to OAR delineation variations. The aim of this study is to quantify the dosimetric impact of contouring variations and to provide a thorough description of pre-trial quality assurance to be used in upcoming trials to provide consistent clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Delineation: Seven physicians delineated OAR in three rounds, with evaluations in-between. For each patient case, seven treatment plans, repeatedly using each of the OAR structure sets from the seven physicians, were made and compared to evaluate the dosimetric effect of delineation variability. Treatment planning: Treatment plans for seven cases were made at six departments in two rounds, with discussion in-between. RESULTS: OAR delineation variation between centres resulted in high variabilities in OAR dose for simulated plans and led to potential overdosage of the lobar bronchus (constraint: D0.03cc < 45 Gy), with maximum doses ranging between 58 Gy (first round), and 50 Gy (third round). For mediastinal tissue, the constraint (D0.03cc < 45 Gy) was violated for the majority of the delineations in all three rounds, with maximum doses of 84 Gy (first round), and 72 Gy (third round).For the treatment planning study, the range of the standard deviation for GTV mean dose was 12.8-18.5 Gy (first round) and 2.8-3.5 Gy (second round). CONCLUSIONS: Even small variations in OAR delineation led to high OAR overdosage. The study demonstrates the importance of having extensive QA procedures in place before initiating clinical trials on dose escalation in SBRT.

Interobserver delineation variation in lung tumour stereotactic body radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: In radiotherapy, delineation uncertainties are important as they contribute to systematic errors and can lead to geographical miss of the target. For margin computation, standard deviations (SDs) of all uncertainties must be included as SDs. The aim of this study was to quantify the interobserver delineation variation for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung tumours using a cross-sectional study design. METHODS: 22 consecutive patients with 26 tumours were included. Positron emission tomography/CT scans were acquired for planning of SBRT. Three oncologists and three radiologists independently delineated the gross tumour volume. The interobserver variation was calculated as a mean of multiple SDs of distances to a reference contour, and calculated for the transversal plane (SD(trans)) and craniocaudal (CC) direction (SD(cc)) separately. Concordance indexes and volume deviations were also calculated. RESULTS: Median tumour volume was 13.0 cm(3), ranging from 0.3 to 60.4 cm(3). The mean SD(trans) was 0.15 cm (SD 0.08 cm) and the overall mean SD(cc) was 0.26 cm (SD 0.15 cm). Tumours with pleural contact had a significantly larger SD(trans) than tumours surrounded by lung tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver delineation variation was very small in this systematic cross-sectional analysis, although significantly larger in the CC direction than in the transversal plane, stressing that anisotropic margins should be applied. This study is the first to make a systematic cross-sectional analysis of delineation variation for peripheral lung tumours referred for SBRT, establishing the evidence that interobserver variation is very small for these tumours.

Evaluation of dose to cardiac structures during breast irradiation.

OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer can lead to late cardiac complications. The highest radiation doses are likely to be to the anterior portion of the heart, including the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). The purpose of this work was to assess the radiation doses delivered to the heart and the LAD in respiration-adapted radiotherapy of patients with left-sided breast cancer. METHODS: 24 patients referred for adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for left-sided lymph node positive breast cancer were evaluated. The whole heart, the arch of the LAD and the whole LAD were contoured. The radiation doses to all three cardiac structures were evaluated. RESULTS: For 13 patients, the plans were acceptable based on the criteria set for all 3 contours. For seven patients, the volume of heart irradiated was well below the set clinical threshold whereas a high dose was still being delivered to the LAD. In 1 case, the dose to the LAD was low while 19% of the contoured heart volume received over 20 Gy. In five patients, the dose to the arch LAD was relatively low while the dose to the whole LAD was considerably higher. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that it is necessary to assess the dose delivered to the whole heart as well as to the whole LAD when investigating the acceptability of a breast irradiation treatment. Assessing the dose to only one of these structures could lead to excessive heart irradiation and thereby increased risk of cardiac complications for breast cancer radiotherapy patients.