Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 10(12): e037722, 2020 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334827

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To study the association between retirement characteristics and frailty in a homogenous population of former business executives. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study using data from the Helsinki Businessmen Study. SETTING: Helsinki, Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 1324 Caucasian men, born in 1919-1934, who had worked as business executives and managers and of whom 95.9% had retired by the year 2000. Questions on age at and type of retirement, lifestyle and chronic conditions were embedded in questionnaires. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Frailty assessed according to a modified phenotype definition at mean age 73.3 years. RESULTS: Mean age at retirement was 61.3 years (SD 4.3) and 37.1% had retired due to old age. The prevalence of frailty was lowest among men retiring at ages 66-67 years but increased among those who worked up to age 70 years or older. Compared with men who retired before age 55 years, those retiring at ages 58-69 years were at decreased risk of frailty in old age relative to non-frailty (adjusted ORs 0.07-0.29, p<0.05). Compared with men who transitioned into old age retirement, those who retired due to disability were at increased risk of prefrailty (adjusted OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.32) and frailty (adjusted OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.97 to 6.29), relative to non-frailty. CONCLUSION: Exiting working life early and continuing to be occupationally active until age 70 years and older were both associated with increased risk of frailty among the men. Promotion of longer work careers could, however, promote healthier ageing, as the lowest prevalence of frailty was observed in former business executives who retired at ages 66-67 years.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Retirement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Finland/epidemiology , Frail Elderly , Frailty/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Drugs Aging ; 35(11): 1017-1023, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30315403

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: No study has investigated how exercise modifies the effect of fall-related drugs (FRDs) on falls among people with Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate how exercise intervention and FRDs interact with fall risk among patients with AD. METHODS: In the FINALEX trial, community-dwelling persons with AD received either home-based or group-based exercise twice weekly for 1 year (n =129); the control group received normal care (n =65). The number of falls was based on spouses' fall diaries. We examined the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for falls among both non-users and users of various FRDs (antihypertensives, psychotropics, drugs with anticholinergic properties [DAPs]) in both control and combined intervention groups. RESULTS: Between the intervention and control groups, there was no difference in the number of falls among those without antihypertensives or psychotropics. In the intervention group taking antihypertensives, the IRR was 0.5 falls/person-year (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.6), while in the control group, the IRR was 1.5 falls/person-year (95% CI 1.2-1.8) [p < 0.001 for group, p = 0.067 for medication, p < 0.001 for interaction]. Among patients using psychotropics, the intervention group had an IRR of 0.7 falls/person-year (95% CI 0.6-0.9), while the control group had an IRR of 2.0 falls/person-year (95% CI 1.6-2.5) [p < 0.001 for group, p = 0.071 for medication, p < 0.001 for interaction]. There was a significant difference in falls between the intervention and control groups not using DAPs (0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7; 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.4), and between the intervention and control groups using DAPs (1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.3; 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.1) [p < 0.001 for group, p = 0.014 for medication, p  = 0.97 for interaction]. CONCLUSION: Exercise has the potential to decrease the risk for falls among people with AD using antihypertensives and psychotropics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12608000037303.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Exercise , Female , Humans , Independent Living , Male
3.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra ; 7(2): 195-203, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28690633

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with dementia are at high risk for falls. However, little is known of the features causing falls in Alzheimer disease (AD). Our aim was to investigate how participants with AD fall. METHODS: In the FINALEX (Finnish Alzheimer Disease Exercise Trial) study, participants' (n = 194) falls were followed up for 1 year by diaries kept by their spouses. RESULTS: The most common reason for falls (n = 355) was stumbling (n = 61). Of the falls, 123 led to injuries, 50 to emergency department visits, and 13 to fractures. The participants without falls (n = 103) were younger and had milder dementia than those with 1 (n = 34) or ≥2 falls (n = 57). Participants with a Mini Mental State Examination score of around 10 points were most prone to fall. In adjusted regression models, good nutritional status, good physical functioning, and use of antihypertensive medication (incident rate ratio [IRR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.85) protected against falls, whereas fall history (IRR 2.71, 95% CI 2.13-3.44), osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, higher number of drugs, drugs with anticholinergic properties, psychotropics, and opioids (IRR 4.27, 95% CI 2.92-6.24) were risk factors for falls. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a detailed account on how and why people with AD fall, suggesting several risk and protective factors.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...