ABSTRACT
Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) threatens to derail tuberculosis control efforts, particularly in Africa where the disease remains out of control. The dogma that DR-TB epidemics are fueled by unchecked rates of acquired resistance in inadequately treated or non-adherent individuals is no longer valid in most high DR-TB burden settings, where community transmission is now widespread. A large burden of DR-TB in Africa remains undiagnosed due to inadequate access to diagnostic tools that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and screen for resistance. Furthermore, acquisition of drug resistance to new and repurposed drugs, for which diagnostic solutions are not yet available, presents a major challenge for the implementation of novel, all-oral, shortened (6-9 months) treatment. Structural challenges including poverty, stigma, and social distress disrupt engagement in care, promote poor treatment outcomes, and reduce the quality of life for people with DR-TB. We reflect on the lessons learnt from the South African experience in implementing state-of-the-art advances in diagnostic solutions, deploying recent innovations in pharmacotherapeutic approaches for rapid cure, understanding local transmission dynamics and implementing interventions to curtail DR-TB transmission, and in mitigating the catastrophic socioeconomic costs of DR-TB. We also highlight globally relevant and locally responsive research priorities for achieving DR-TB control in South Africa.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/transmission , South Africa/epidemiology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: For people living with HIV/AIDS, care is commonly delivered through Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD). Although people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and HIV/AIDS experience severe treatment associated challenges, there is no DSD model to support their treatment. In this study, we defined patterns of medication adherence and characterized longitudinal barriers to inform development of an MDR-TB/HIV DSD framework. METHODS: Adults with MDR-TB and HIV initiating bedaquiline (BDQ) and receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, were enrolled and followed through the end of MDR-TB treatment. Electronic dose monitoring devices (EDM) measured BDQ and ART adherence. Longitudinal focus groups were conducted and transcripts analyzed thematically to describe discrete treatment stage-specific and cross-cutting treatment challenges. RESULTS: 283 participants were enrolled and followed through treatment completion (median 17.8 months [IQR 16.5-20.2]). Thirteen focus groups were conducted. Most participants (82.7%, 234/283) maintained high adherence (mean BDQ adherence 95.3%; mean ART adherence 85.5%), but an adherence-challenged subpopulation with <85% cumulative adherence (17.3%, 49/283) had significant declines in mean weekly BDQ adherence from 94.9% to 39.9% (p<0.0001) and mean weekly ART adherence from 83.9% to 26.6% (p<0.0001) over 6 months. Psychosocial, behavioral, and structural obstacles identified in qualitative data were associated with adherence deficits in discrete treatment stages, and identified potential stage specific interventions. CONCLUSION: A DSD framework for MDR-TB/HIV should intensify support for adherence-challenged subpopulations, provide multi-modal support for adherence across the treatment course and account for psychosocial, behavioral, and structural challenges linked to discrete treatment stages.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical bedaquiline resistance predominantly involves mutations in mmpR5 (Rv0678). However, mmpR5 resistance-associated variants (RAVs) have a variable relationship with phenotypic Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance. We did a systematic review to assess the maximal sensitivity of sequencing bedaquiline resistance-associated genes and evaluate the association between RAVs and phenotypic resistance, using traditional and machine-based learning techniques. METHODS: We screened public databases for articles published from database inception until Oct 31, 2022. Eligible studies performed sequencing of at least mmpR5 and atpE on clinically sourced M tuberculosis isolates and measured bedaquiline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). A bias risk scoring tool was used to identify bias. Individual genetic mutations and corresponding MICs were aggregated, and odds ratios calculated to determine association of mutations with resistance. Machine-based learning methods were used to define test characteristics of parsimonious sets of diagnostic RAVs, and mmpR5 mutations were mapped to the protein structure to highlight mechanisms of resistance. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022346547). FINDINGS: 18 eligible studies were identified, comprising 975 M tuberculosis isolates containing at least one potential RAV (mutation in mmpR5, atpE, atpB, or pepQ), with 201 (20·6%) showing phenotypic bedaquiline resistance. 84 (29·5%) of 285 resistant isolates had no candidate gene mutation. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of taking an any mutation approach was 69% and 14%, respectively. 13 mutations, all in mmpR5, had a significant association with a resistant MIC (adjusted p<0·05). Gradient-boosted machine classifier models for predicting intermediate or resistant and resistant phenotypes both had receiver operator characteristic c statistic of 0·73 (95% CI 0·70-0·76). Frameshift mutations clustered in the α1 helix DNA-binding domain, and substitutions in the α2 and α3 helix hinge region and in the α4 helix-binding domain. INTERPRETATION: Sequencing candidate genes is insufficiently sensitive to diagnose clinical bedaquiline resistance, but where identified, some mutations should be assumed to be associated with resistance. Genomic tools are most likely to be effective in combination with rapid phenotypic diagnostics. This study was limited by selective sampling in contributing studies and only considering single genetic loci as causative of resistance. FUNDING: Francis Crick Institute and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents , Diarylquinolines , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Diarylquinolines/therapeutic use , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Humans , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/genetics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Genomics/methods , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Highly effective, short-course, bedaquiline-containing treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing fixed dose combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) have radically transformed treatment for MDR-TB and HIV. However, without advances in adherence support, we may not realize the full potential of these therapeutics. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of adherence support interventions on clinical and biological endpoints using an adaptive randomized platform. METHODS: This is a prospective, adaptive, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of four adherence support strategies on a composite clinical outcome in adults with MDR-TB and HIV initiating bedaquiline-containing MDR-TB treatment regimens and receiving ART in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Trial arms include (1) enhanced standard of care, (2) psychosocial support, (3) mHealth using cellular-enabled electronic dose monitoring, and (4) combined mHealth and psychosocial support. The level of support will be titrated using a differentiated service delivery (DSD)-informed assessment of treatment support needs. The composite primary outcome will include survival, negative TB culture, retention in care, and undetectable HIV viral load at month 12. Secondary outcomes will include individual components of the primary outcome and quantitative evaluation of adherence on TB and HIV treatment outcomes. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the contribution of different modes of adherence support on MDR-TB and HIV outcomes with WHO-recommended all-oral MDR-TB regimens and ART in a high-burden operational setting. We will also assess the utility of a DSD framework to pragmatically adjust levels of MDR-TB and HIV treatment support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05633056. Registered on 1 December 2022.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Adult , Humans , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/complications , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , South Africa/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) potentially exacerbates drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). We describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of three patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), DR-TB and COVID-19. Case One: A virologically suppressed 31-year-old man on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB treatment presented with mild COVID-19 and was hospitalised for 10 days of clinical monitoring, despite being clinically stable with normal baseline inflammatory markers. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus polymerase chain reaction (SARS-CoV-2 PCR) positivity persisted at Day 28. Case Two: A virologically suppressed 37-year-old woman on ART and MDR-TB treatment presented with moderate COVID-19. Baseline inflammatory markers were raised, and dexamethasone and azithromycin were initiated with good clinical improvement. SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity persisted at Day 28. Case Three: A viraemic 24-year-old woman on second-line ART and MDR-TB treatment, presented with mild COVID-19 disease, normal oxygenation and normal inflammatory markers, and remained clinically stable with negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR at Days 14 and 28. Conclusion: Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection is advised for DR-TB patients with new or worsening respiratory symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Background: High-dose isoniazid is recommended in the 9-12 months short-course regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with inhA mutation. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the assumption of genotypic-phenotypic concordance. This study aimed to identify the genetic mutations associated with high-level phenotypic isoniazid resistance. Methods: Clinical isolates from patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis were profiled by whole-genome sequencing and subjected to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing using MGIT based-method. MICs were performed in concentration ranges based on the mutation present: isolates with no isoniazid resistance-conferring mutations and H37Rv, 0.016-0.256 µg/ml; inhA, 0.256-4.0 µg/ml, katG 1.0-16.0 µg/ml; and inhA + katG, 4.0-64.0 µg/ml. Isolates demonstrating resistance at the upper limit of the concentration range were tested up to the maximum of 64.0 µg/ml. Bootstrap of the mean MICs was performed to increase the robustness of the estimates and an overlap index was used to compare the distributions of the MICs for each mutation profile. Results: A total of 52 clinical isolates were included in this analysis. Bootstrap MIC means for inhA, katG and inhA + katG were 33.64 (95% CI, 9.47, 56.90), 6.79 (4.45, 9.70) and 52.34 (42.750, 61.66) µg/ml, respectively. There was high overlap between inhA and inhA + katG mutations (eta = 0.45) but not with inhA and katG (eta = 0.19). Furthermore, katG showed poor overlap with inhA + katG mutations (eta = 0.09). Unexpectedly, 4/8 (50.0%) of all InhA mutants demonstrated high-level resistance, while 20/24 (83.3%) of katG mutants demonstrated moderate-level resistance. Conclusions: InhA mutations demonstrated unexpectedly high MICs and showed high overlap with inhA + katG. Contrary to the common belief that katG mutants are associated with high-level resistance, this mutation primarily showed moderate-level resistance.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lung cavitation is associated with heightened TB transmission and poor treatment outcomes. This study aimed to determine the relationship between systemic inflammation and lung cavitation in drug-resistant TB patients with and without HIV co-infection. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from 128 participants from the CAPRISA 020 Individualized M(X)drug-resistant TB Treatment Strategy Study (InDEX) prior to treatment initiation. Lung cavitation was present in 61 of the 128 drug-resistant TB patients with 93 being co-infected with HIV. The plasma cytokine and chemokine levels were measured using the 27-Plex Human Cytokine immunoassay. Modified Poisson regression models were used to determine the association between plasma cytokine/chemokine expression and lung cavitation in individuals with drug-resistant TB. RESULTS: Higher Interleukin-6 plasma levels (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.405, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.079-1.829, p = 0.011) were associated with a higher risk of lung cavitation in the multivariable model adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, HIV status, smoking and previous history of TB. Smoking was associated with an increased risk of lung cavitation (aRR 1.784, 95% CI 1.167-2.729, p = 0.008). An HIV positive status and a higher body mass index, were associated with reduced risk of lung cavitation (aRR 0.537, 95% CI 0.371-0.775, p = 0.001 and aRR 0.927, 95% CI 0.874-0.983, p = 0.012 respectively). CONCLUSION: High plasma interleukin-6 levels are associated with an increased risk of cavitary TB highlighting the role of interleukin-6 in the immunopathology of drug-resistant TB.
Subject(s)
Interleukin-6 , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Adult , Male , Female , Lung/pathology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/immunology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/pathology , Interleukin-6/blood , Interleukin-6/immunology , HIV Infections/pathology , Coinfection/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a prodrug of tenofovir, achieves higher intracellular concentrations of tenofovir-diphosphate and 90% lower plasma concentrations of tenofovir compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). TAF is associated with improved renal and bone safety outcomes. AREAS COVERED: We review the efficacy and safety of TAF-containing regimens in adults and pediatrics. We highlight safety data during pregnancy, drug interactions during co-administration with tuberculosis treatment, and critical knowledge gaps to be addressed for the successful implementation of TAF in low- and middle-income countries. We performed a search on MEDLINE PubMed and conference websites for relevant articles published from January 2010 to March 2023. EXPERT OPINION: Current evidence demonstrates that TAF has similar efficacy and tolerability, superior bone and renal safety, and higher rates of dyslipidemia and weight gain, compared with TDF. However, there are several knowledge gaps, in specific sub-populations, that require action. Emerging data suggests that TAF is safe during pregnancy, although fuller safety data to support TAF use in pregnancy is needed. Similarly, there is a lack of evidence that TAF can be used in combination with rifamycin-based tuberculosis treatment in PWH and TB. Further studies are needed to fill knowledge gaps and support the wider rollout of TAF.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Tuberculosis , Adult , Humans , Child , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Alanine/adverse effects , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Tenofovir/adverse effects , Tuberculosis/drug therapyABSTRACT
Natural killer (NK) cells, key effector cells of the innate immune system, play an important role in the clearance and control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV infections. Here, we utilized peripheral blood specimens from the Improving Retreatment Success CAPRISA 011 study to characterize NK cell phenotypes during active TB in individuals with or without HIV co-infection. We further assessed the effects of TB treatment on NK cell phenotype, and characterized the effects of NK cell phenotypes during active TB on mycobacterial clearance and TB disease severity measured by the presence of lung cavitation. TB/HIV co-infection led to the expansion of functionally impaired CD56neg NK cell subset. TB treatment completion resulted in restoration of total NK cells, NK cell subset redistribution and downregulation of several NK cell activating and inhibitory receptors. Higher percentage of peripheral CD56bright cells was associated with longer time to culture conversion, while higher expression of NKp46 on CD56dim NK cells was associated with lower odds of lung cavitation in the overall cohort and the TB/HIV co-infected participants. Together these results provide a detailed description of peripheral NK cells in TB and TB/HIV co-infection and yield insights into their role in TB disease pathology.
Subject(s)
Coinfection , HIV Infections , Humans , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Coinfection/pathology , Killer Cells, Natural , Phenotype , Patient Acuity , CD56 AntigenABSTRACT
Long COVID is an emerging public health threat, following swiftly behind the surges of acute infection over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is estimated that there are already approximately 100 million people suffering from Long COVID globally, 0.5 million of whom are South African, and for whom our incomplete understanding of the condition has forestalled appropriate diagnosis and clinical care. There are several leading postulates for the complex, multi-mechanistic pathogenesis of Long COVID. Patients with Long COVID may present with a diversity of clinical phenotypes, often with significant overlap, which may exhibit temporal heterogeneity and evolution. Post-acute care follow-up, targeted screening, diagnosis, a broad initial assessment and more directed subsequent assessments are necessary at the primary care level. Symptomatic treatment, self-management and rehabilitation are the mainstays of clinical care for Long COVID. However, evidence-based pharmacological interventions for the prevention and treatment of Long COVID are beginning to emerge. This article presents a rational approach for assessing and managing patients with Long COVID in the primary care setting.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Public Health , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
Background: Highly effective, short course, bedaquiline-containing treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing fixed dose combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) have radically transformed treatment for MDR-TB and HIV. However, without advances in adherence support, we may not realize the full potential of these therapeutics. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of adherence support interventions on clinical and biological endpoints using an adaptive randomized platform. Methods: This is a prospective, adaptive, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of four adherence support strategies on a composite clinical outcome in adults with MDR-TB and HIV initiating bedaquiline-containing MDR-TB treatment regimens and receiving ART in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Trial arms include 1) enhanced standard of care; 2) psychosocial support; 3) mHealth using cellular- enabled electronic dose monitoring; 4) combined mHealth and psychosocial support. The level of support will be titrated using a differentiated service delivery (DSD)-informed assessment of treatment support needs. The composite primary outcome will be include survival, negative TB culture, retention in care and undetectable HIV viral load at month 12. Secondary outcomes will include individual components of the primary outcome and quantitative evaluation of adherence on TB and HIV treatment outcomes. Discussion: This trial will evaluate the contribution of different modes of adherence support on MDR-TB and HIV outcomes with WHO recommended all-oral MDR-TB regimens and ART in a high-burden operational setting. We will also assess the utility of a DSD framework to pragmatically adjust levels of MDR-TB and HIV treatment support.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Current TB treatment regimens are pathogen-directed and can be severely compromised by the development of drug resistance. Metformin has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy for TB, however relatively little is known about how metformin modulates the cellular interaction between Mtb and macrophages. We aimed to characterize how metformin modulates Mtb growth within macrophages. Methods: We utilized live cell tracking through time-lapse microscopy to better understand the biological effect of metformin in response to Mtb infection. Furthermore, the potent first-line anti-TB drug, isoniazid, was used as a comparator and as a companion drug. Results: Metformin caused a 14.2-fold decrease in Mtb growth compared to the untreated control. Metformin combined with isoniazid controlled Mtb growth is slightly better than isoniazid alone. Metformin demonstrated the ability to regulate the cytokine and chemokine response over a 72 hour period, better than isoniazid only. Conclusion: We provide novel evidence that metformin controls mycobacterial growth by increasing host cell viability, and a direct and independent pro-inflammatory response to Mtb. Understanding the impact of metformin on Mtb growth within macrophages will advance our current knowledge on metformin as an adjunctive therapy, providing a new host-directed approach to TB treatment.
ABSTRACT
As COVID-19 evolves from a pandemic to an endemic disease, the already staggering number of people that have been or will be infected with SARS-CoV-2 is only destined to increase, and the majority of humanity will be infected. It is well understood that COVID-19, like many other viral infections, leaves a significant fraction of the infected with prolonged consequences. Continued high number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, viral evolution with escape from post-infection and vaccinal immunity, and reinfections heighten the potential impact of Long COVID. Hence, the impact of COVID-19 on human health will be seen for years to come until more effective vaccines and pharmaceutical treatments become available. To that effect, it is imperative that the mechanisms underlying the clinical manifestations of Long COVID be elucidated. In this article, we provide an in-depth analysis of the evidence on several potential mechanisms of Long COVID and discuss their relevance to its pathogenesis.
ABSTRACT
Post-Acute Sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus - 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, or Long COVID, is a prevailing second pandemic with nearly 100 million affected individuals globally and counting. We propose a visual description of the complexity of Long COVID and its pathogenesis that can be used by researchers, clinicians, and public health officials to guide the global effort toward an improved understanding of Long COVID and the eventual mechanism-based provision of care to afflicted patients. The proposed visualization or framework for Long COVID should be an evidence-based, dynamic, modular, and systems-level approach to the condition. Furthermore, with further research such a framework could establish the strength of the relationships between pre-existing conditions (or risk factors), biological mechanisms, and resulting clinical phenotypes and outcomes of Long COVID. Notwithstanding the significant contribution that disparities in access to care and social determinants of health have on outcomes and disease course of long COVID, our model focuses primarily on biological mechanisms. Accordingly, the proposed visualization sets out to guide scientific, clinical, and public health efforts to better understand and abrogate the health burden imposed by long COVID.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Public Health , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Background: Understanding Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) intra-host evolution of drug resistance is important for successful drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) treatment and control strategies. This study aimed to characterise the acquisition of genetic mutations and low-frequency variants associated with treatment-emergent Mtb drug resistance in longitudinally profiled clinical isolates from patients who experienced DR-TB treatment failure. Patients and Methods: We performed deep Whole Genome Sequencing on 23 clinical isolates obtained longitudinally across nine timepoints from five patients who experienced DR-TB treatment failure enrolled in the CAPRISA 020 InDEX study. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were established on the BACTEC™ MGIT 960™ instrument on 15/23 longitudinal clinical isolates for eight anti-TB drugs (rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, clofazimine, bedaquiline). Results: In total, 22 resistance associated mutations/variants were detected. We observed four treatment-emergent mutations in two out of the five patients. Emerging resistance to the fluoroquinolones was associated with 16- and 64-fold elevated levofloxacin (2-8 mg/L) and moxifloxacin (1-2 mg/L) MICs, respectively, resulting from the D94G/N and A90V variants in the gyrA gene. We identified two novel mutations associated with elevated bedaquiline MICs (>66-fold): an emerging frameshift variant (D165) on the Rv0678 gene and R409Q variant on the Rv1979c gene present from baseline. Conclusion: Genotypic and phenotypic resistance to the fluoroquinolones and bedaquiline was acquired in two out of five patients who experienced DR-TB treatment failure. Deep sequencing of multiple longitudinal clinical isolates for resistance-associated mutations coupled with phenotypic MIC testing confirmed intra-host Mtb evolution.
ABSTRACT
Background: Clinical bedaquiline resistance predominantly involves mutations in mmpR5 (Rv0678). However, mmpR5 resistance-associated variants (RAVs) have a variable relationship with phenotypic M. tuberculosis resistance. We performed a systematic review to (1) assess the maximal sensitivity of sequencing bedaquiline resistance-associated genes and (2) evaluate the association between RAVs and phenotypic resistance, using traditional and machine-based learning techniques. Methods: We screened public databases for articles published until October 2022. Eligible studies performed sequencing of at least mmpR5 and atpE on clinically-sourced M. tuberculosis isolates and measured bedaquiline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). We performed genetic analysis for identification of phenotypic resistance and determined the association of RAVs with resistance. Machine-based learning methods were employed to define test characteristics of optimised sets of RAVs, and mmpR5 mutations were mapped to the protein structure to highlight mechanisms of resistance. Results: Eighteen eligible studies were identified, comprising 975 M. tuberculosis isolates containing ≥1 potential RAV (mutation in mmpR5, atpE, atpB or pepQ), with 201 (20.6%) demonstrating phenotypic bedaquiline resistance. 84/285 (29.5%) resistant isolates had no candidate gene mutation. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of taking an 'any mutation' approach was 69% and 14% respectively. Thirteen mutations, all in mmpR5, had a significant association with a resistant MIC (adjusted p<0.05). Gradient-boosted machine classifier models for predicting intermediate/resistant and resistant phenotypes both had receiver operator characteristic c-statistics of 0.73. Frameshift mutations clustered in the alpha 1 helix DNA binding domain, and substitutions in the alpha 2 and 3 helix hinge region and in the alpha 4 helix binding domain. Discussion: Sequencing candidate genes is insufficiently sensitive to diagnose clinical bedaquiline resistance, but where identified a limited number of mutations should be assumed to be associated with resistance. Genomic tools are most likely to be effective in combination with rapid phenotypic diagnostics.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to describe the prevalence of and risk factors for post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal observational cohort study. Hospitalized and nonhospitalized adults were randomly selected to undergo telephone assessment at 1, 3, and 6 months. Participants were assessed using a standardized questionnaire for the evaluation of symptoms and health-related quality of life. We used negative binomial regression models to determine factors associated with the presence of ≥1 symptoms at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 46.7% of hospitalized and 18.5% of nonhospitalized participants experienced ≥1 symptoms at 6 months (P ≤0.001). Among hospitalized people living with HIV, 40.4% had persistent symptoms compared with 47.1% among participants without HIV (P = 0.108). The risk factors for PCC included older age, female sex, non-Black race, presence of a comorbidity, greater number of acute COVID-19 symptoms, hospitalization/COVID-19 severity, and wave period (lower risk of persistent symptoms for the Omicron compared with the Beta wave). There were no associations between self-reported vaccination status with persistent symptoms. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a high prevalence of persistent symptoms among South African participants at 6 months but decreased risk for PCC among participants infected during the Omicron BA.1 wave. These findings have serious implications for countries with resource-constrained health care systems.