Dexamethasone-Free Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Double-Blind, Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial (CINV POD study).

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of a dexamethasone (DEX)-free regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prophylaxis in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) is not known. METHODS: This was a double-blind, phase III trial designed to show the noninferiority of a DEX-free regimen (olanzapine, palonosetron, and fosaprepitant [OPF]) compared with the DEX-containing regimen (olanzapine, palonosetron, and DEX [OPD]). Chemotherapy-naïve patients age 18-80 years receiving single-day HEC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the OPD regimen or the OPF regimen. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates for vomiting during the overall period (start of chemotherapy to 120 hours). Secondary objectives included CR for vomiting during the acute period (0-24 hours) and delayed period (24-120 hours), CR for nausea, and comparison of toxicities and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six patients received the study interventions, 174 in the OPD arm and 172 in the OPF arm. The DEX-free OPF arm had significantly higher CR rates for vomiting compared with the DEX-containing OPD arm in acute (94.7% v 85.6%; P < .004), delayed (81.9% v 50.5%; P < .001), and overall (79.6% v 48.8%; P < .001) periods. For nausea, CR rates in the OPF arm were higher in delayed (53.4% v 39.6%; P = .009) and overall (50.5% v 39.1%; P = .031) periods but not in the acute period (77.9% v 81.6%; P = .39). Fatigue (P = .009) and drowsiness (P = .002) were more in the OPF arm in the acute period and insomnia (P < .001) in the OPD arm in the overall period. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a DEX-free OPF regimen is efficacious and should be considered a standard option for acute and delayed CINV prophylaxis for HEC.

Detection of serum M-protein in acetonitrile precipitates by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: A novel, low-cost methodology.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated the analytical sensitivity of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) by immunoenrichment for M-protein analysis. We report the results of a novel, low-cost, reagent-based extraction process using acetonitrile (ACN) precipitation to enrich for κ and λ light chains which can be analysed by MALDI-TOF MS. METHODS: Institutional Ethics committee approval was obtained. Serum samples from patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), multiple myeloma (MM), plasmacytoma, AL amyloidosis and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) underwent ACN precipitation. The images obtained were overlaid on apparently healthy donor serum samples to confirm the presence of M-protein. A sample was considered positive for M-protein if there was a sharp or broad peak within the κ or λ mass/charge (m/z) range: m/z- [M + 2H]2+: 11,550-12,300 Da and λ m/z- [M + 2H]2+: 11,100-11,500 Da. Images were acquired at a m/z range of 10,000-29,000 Da. Corresponding serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) and serum free light chain (sFLC) assay by nephelometry were performed for all the samples. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-two serum samples were included in the study: MM- 184 (91%); AL amyloidosis- 2 (1%); plasmacytoma- 8 (4%); MGUS- 6 (3%) and WM- 2 (1%). All the SPEP positive samples were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Out of 179 samples positive for M-protein by IFE, MALDI-TOF MS was positive in 176 samples (98%). Compared to IFE, the sensitivity and specificity of M-protein identification by MALDI-TOF MS were 98.3% and 52.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of qualitatively identifying M-protein without the need for antibody-based immunoenrichment, making the technique cost-effective.

Neutropenic versus regular diet for acute leukaemia induction chemotherapy: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Restriction of raw fruits and vegetables (neutropenic diet) is advised for patients receiving treatment for acute leukaemia in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to reduce infections despite evidence to the contrary from high-income countries. We, therefore, conducted a randomised controlled trial to ascertain the efficacy of the neutropenic diet in an LMIC setting. METHODS: Patients aged 1-60 years receiving induction chemotherapy for acute leukaemia were randomised to a regular or neutropenic diet. The study's primary objective was to compare the incidence of major infections among patients receiving the two diets during induction chemotherapy. The secondary objectives were to compare stool microbial flora and induction mortality rates. RESULTS: We randomised 200 patients, 98 patients to the regular diet arm and 102 to the neutropenic diet arm. Major infections occurred in 32 (32%) patients in the regular diet arm and 26 (25%) patients in the neutropenic diet arm (p=0.26). There were no statistically significant differences between patients receiving a regular diet versus neutropenic diet for blood culture positivity (n=6 vs 9), inotropic support (17 vs 12), mechanical ventilation (8 vs 5), third-line antibiotic use (28 vs 20), minor infections (12 vs 9), induction mortality (9 vs 4) and remission status (94% vs 94%). The stool culture on day 15 of induction grew multidrug-resistant bacteria in 38% of patients in the regular diet arm and 35% in the neutropenic diet arm (p=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: A neutropenic diet did not prevent infections, reduce mortality or change stool microbial flora in patients with acute leukaemia.

Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Leukemia's: Experience from a Cancer Center in India.

There has been a surge in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in India recently. However, there is a paucity of data on haploidentical HSCT from India. The report is an analysis of data of haploidentical HSCT performed at our center. Analysis of patients with acute leukemia or chronic myeloid leukemia who underwent haploidentical HSCT during 2014-2019 was performed. The graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was post-transplant Cyclophosphamide with Mycophenolate-mofetil and Cyclosporine. All patients were transfused peripheral blood stem cells from donors. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Twenty-one patients underwent haploidentical HSCT. Fourteen-patients were males. The median age of patients was 15 years. Fludarabine with total body irradiation was the most common conditioning regimen (n = 15, 71.4%). The median duration for neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 14 days. Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 19%, and 38% respectively. The median follow-up was 26 months and the two-year OS was 38%. Twelve (57%) patients died during the study period, 8 patients (38%) died from transplant-related mortality (TRM), and 4 from disease relapse. Sepsis was the cause of death in six of the eight TRM. Nine out of 21 patients (42.8%) are leukemia-free on follow-up. Haploidentical HSCT is a promising modality of treatment in patients who have no suitable matched donors. Though the TRM remains high, good disease control was achieved in 42.8% of patients. Multi-drug resistant bacterial infection remains a challenge in performing haploidentical HSCT in developing countries.

Olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced vomiting in children: An open-label, randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) is defined as CIV occurring after adequate antiemetic prophylaxis. Olanzapine and metoclopramide are two drugs recommended for the treatment of breakthrough CIV in children, without adequate evidence. We conducted an open-label, single-center, phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of olanzapine and metoclopramide for treating breakthrough CIV. PROCEDURE: Children aged 5-18 years who developed breakthrough CIV after receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy were randomly assigned to the metoclopramide or olanzapine arm. The primary objective of the study was to compare the complete response (CR) rates between patients receiving olanzapine or metoclopramide for treating breakthrough CIV during 72 hours after the administration of the study drug. Secondary objectives were to compare CR rates for nausea and toxicities between the two arms. RESULTS: Eighty patients were analyzed (39 in the olanzapine arm and 41 in the metoclopramide arm). CR rates were significantly higher in the olanzapine arm compared with the metoclopramide arm for vomiting (72% vs 39%, P = 0.003) and nausea (59% vs 34%, P = 0.026). Seven patients in the metoclopramide arm crossed over to the olanzapine arm and none crossed over in the olanzapine arm (P < 0.001). The mean nausea score in the olanzapine arm was significantly lower than the metoclopramide arm after the initiation of the rescue antiemetic (P = 0.01). Hyperglycemia and drowsiness were more commonly seen in the olanzapine arm. CONCLUSION: Olanzapine is superior to metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough CIV in children. Drowsiness and hyperglycemia need to be monitored closely in children receiving olanzapine for breakthrough CIV.