Long-term compliance, safety, and tolerability of sodium oxybate treatment in patients with narcolepsy type 1: a postauthorization, noninterventional surveillance study.

Study Objectives: To evaluate adherence to sodium oxybate prescribing information for indication and dosage, patients' compliance with instructions for use, safety/tolerability in routine clinical practice, and abuse potential. Methods: A postauthorization, noninterventional surveillance study (NCT00244465) in patients who were prescribed sodium oxybate according to current practice by sleep disorders specialists. Patients were monitored for ≤18 months. Results: Overall, 749 patients were enrolled; 730 included in the intent-to-treat population (narcolepsy type 1 n = 670, other indications n = 60). We report on patients with narcolepsy type 1 (female 47.9%, mean age 39.4 years); 495/670 (73.9%) completed the study. Median dose: at start of study 4.5 g per night, 6 g per night throughout study, in two equal doses. According to the treatment compliance checklist, 35.5 per cent of patients consumed alcohol, 19.3 per cent took the medication <2 hr after food, and 27.1 per cent did not adhere to recommended time schedule, with few associated treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Incidences of higher-than-recommended doses, difficulty in preparing doses, and abuse were low. TEAEs were reported by 67.3 per cent, most frequently headache (11.6%) and nasopharyngitis (6.4%). Discontinuation due to TEAEs: 8.8 per cent. Serious TEAEs: 6.4 per cent. There were no reports of respiratory depression. No particular safety concerns were identified in pediatric or elderly patients, or those with underlying sleep apnea. Conclusions: In this large postauthorization safety study of sodium oxybate use, indication and dosage prescribing recommendations were generally followed, and most patients complied with instructions, with deviations around alcohol consumption, eating before dosing and timing. The overall safety profile was consistent with previous observations; incidence of abuse was low. Section: Neurological disorders. Clinical Trial: Postauthorization, noninterventional, surveillance, pharmacoepidemiology study to evaluate long-term safety, tolerability, and compliance in administration of Xyrem (sodium oxybate) oral solution in patients who receive treatment with this medication in regular clinical practice. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00244465, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00244465.

Randomized, double-blind, crossover study of the adhesiveness of two formulations of rotigotine transdermal patch in patients with Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: In patch-based transdermal drug delivery, adhesiveness is critical for safe and effective treatment, especially in Parkinson's disease (PD) where excessive sweating is common. This study compared the adhesiveness of two transdermal patch formulations of rotigotine (improved room temperature-stable [PR2.3.1/Treatment A] and intermediate cold storage product [PR2.1.1/Treatment B]), using the largest patch size (40 cm2). METHODS: PD0018 (NCT02230904) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. PD patients received Treatments A and B in randomized order for 2 days each. Patch adhesiveness was measured immediately after patch application and 24 hours thereafter (before removal). Primary variable: change in average investigator-rated adhesiveness score between treatments, per modified European Medicines Agency scale (EMA/CHMP/QWP/911254/2011, 2012). RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were randomized; 56 patients completed the study. Five patients were excluded from analysis for accidental unblinding. Treatment A had better average adhesiveness score (mean ± SD Treatment A - Treatment B: 1.115 ± 1.635). A higher percentage of patients on both days had patch adhesiveness ≥95% at 24 hours for Treatment A (first day: 65.4%, second day: 71.2%) vs. Treatment B (46.2%, 36.5%), and were satisfied with patch adhesiveness of Treatment A (first day: 75.0%, second day: 73.1%) vs. Treatment B (65.4%, 59.6%). Average patch-wear duration was similar between formulations (23.761 hours vs. 23.495 hours per patch). Both formulations were well tolerated with no new safety observations. CONCLUSION: Results indicated greater adhesiveness for the improved room temperature-stable formulation (PR2.3.1) vs. intermediate cold storage product (PR2.1.1) using the largest patch-size, with comparable safety and skin tolerability.